Analisis kinerja dan menyusun strategi dengan menggunakan balanced scorecard

Main Article Content

David Chandra
Yanuar

Abstract

This study aims to measure company performance using the Balanced Scorecard tool assisted by the Analytical Hierarchy Process tool. The measurement results will be used as the basis for making a strategy for the company. This type of research is descriptive and data collection is done by taking company data and distributing questionnaires to measure customer and employee satisfaction. Respondents to the customer satisfaction questionnaire were distributed to company consumers and a total sample of 120 was taken. While the respondents for the employee satisfaction questionnaire were distributed to employees who had worked for at least 1 year so a total sample of 70 was collected. The application used for the weighting was Expert Choice 11 and the application which is used to process the questionnaire data is SPSS. The results of the weighting shown that the most important perspective for the company is the customer and financial perspective where there are 4 most important sub-criteria, namely Customer Satisfaction, Sales (ROE), Customer Retention, and Profitability (NPM). Based on performance measurement using a Balanced Scorecard, the customer perspective and growth and learning have good performance, while the financial perspective and internal business processes have moderate performance. Overall, the average performance of the four perspectives performs well.


Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengukur kinerja perusahaan menggunakan alat Balanced Scorecard yang dibantu dengan alat Analytical Hierarchy Process. Hasil pengukuran dijadikan dasar dalam pembuatan strategi untuk perusahaan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif dan pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara mengambil data perusahaan dan penyebaran kuesioner untuk mengukur kepuasan pelanggan dan karyawan. Responden untuk kuesioner kepuasan pelanggan dibagikan kepada konsumen perusahaan dan diambil jumlah sampel sebanyak 120. Sedangkan responden untuk kuesioner kepuasan karyawan dibagikan kepada karyawan yang telah bekerja minimal selama 1 tahun sehingga terkumpul jumlah sampel sebanyak 70. Aplikasi yang digunakan untuk pembobotan adalah Expert Choice 11 dan aplikasi yang digunakan untuk mengolah data kuesioner ada SPSS. Hasil dari pembobotan menunjukkan bahwa perspektif terpenting bagi perusahaan adalah perspektif pelanggan dan keuangan yang dimana terdapat 4 sub-kriteria terpentingnya yaitu Kepuasan Pelanggan, Penjualan (ROE), Customer Retention, dan Profitabilitas (NPM). Berdasarkan pengukuran kinerja menggunakan Balanced Scorecard, perspektif pelanggan, dan pertumbuhan dan pembelajaran memiliki kinerja baik, sedangkan perspektif keuangan dan proses bisnis internal memiliki kinerja sedang. Secara keseluruhan rata-rata kinerja dari keempat perspektif berkinerja baik.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chandra, D., & Yanuar. (2023). Analisis kinerja dan menyusun strategi dengan menggunakan balanced scorecard. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 7(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmbk.v7i1.22470
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

David Chandra, Universitas Tarumanagara

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Program Pascasarjana

Yanuar, Universitas Tarumanagara

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Universitas Tarumanagara

References

Aly, A. H., & Mansour, M. E. (2017). Evaluating the sustainable performance of corporate boards: The balanced scorecard approach. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2016-1358

Angelina, E., & Yanuar. (2021). Pengaruh organizational learning culture terhadap employee performance dengan job satisfaction sebagai mediasi. Jurnal Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan, 3(4), 962–696. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmk.v3i4.13438

Aristana, I. N., Arsawan, I. W. E., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2022). Employee loyalty during slowdown of Covid-19: Do satisfaction and trust matter? International Journal of Tourism Cities, 8(1), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-03-2021-0036

Belay, A. M., Kasie, F. M., Helo, P., Takala, J., & Powell, D. J. (2014). Adoption of quality management practices: An investigation of its relationship with labor productivity for labor-intensive manufacturing companies. Benchmarking, 21(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2012-0011

Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(5), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710167230

Cheng, E. W. l., Li, H., & Ho, D. C. k. (2002). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): A defective tool when used improperly. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(4), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040210451697

Darzi, M. A., & Bhat, S. A. (2018). Personnel capability and customer satisfaction as predictors of customer retention in the banking sector: A mediated-moderation study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2017-0074

Felix, G. H., & Riggs, J. L. (1983). Productivity measurement by objectives. National Productivity Review, 2(4), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040020407

Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11–12), 1762–1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456

Hoque, Z., Mia, L., & Alam, M. (2001). Market competition, computer-aided manufacturing and use of multiple performance measures: An empirical study. British Accounting Review, 33(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2000.0149

Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200303

Jochem, R., Menrath, M., & Landgraf, K. (2010). Implementing a quality-based performance measurement system: A case study approach. The TQM Journal, 22(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731011053334

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action (1st ed.). Harvard Business Review Press.

Kropp, J. D., & Katchova, A. L. (2011). The effects of direct payments on liquidity and repayment capacity of beginning farmers. Agricultural Finance Review, 71(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/00021461111177611

Malhotra, N. K., Nunan, D., & Birks, D. F. (2017). Marketing research: An applied approach (5th ed.). Trans-Atlantic Publications.

Melián-González, S., Bulchand-Gidumal, J., & González López-Valcárcel, B. (2015). New evidence of the relationship between employee satisfaction and firm economic performance. Personnel Review, 44(6), 906–929. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2014-0023

Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2016). The determinants of bank profitability: Empirical evidence from European banking sector. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(1), 86–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-05-2015-0060

Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. John Wiley & Sons.

Pekkola, S. (2013). Managing a network by utilizing performance measurement information. Measuring Business Excellence, 17(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041311311374

R.L, M., & Mishra, A. K. (2022). Measuring financial performance of Indian manufacturing firms: Application of decision tree algorithms. Measuring Business Excellence, 26(3), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-05-2020-0073

Rekarti, E., & Doktoralina, C. M. (2017). Improving business performance: A proposed model for SMEs. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3A), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/732

Saaty, T. L. (1995). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world (3rd ed.). RWS Publications.

Sorooshian, S. (2017). Adaptation of a business performance measurement system for Malaysian smaller enterprises. Quality - Access to Success, 18(157), 124–131. https://www.proquest.com/openview/005c2b56d884310c59f7426809588e21/1?cbl=1046413&pq-origsite=gscholar&parentSessionId=yfupf0m8vIklX6hxm53%2BVU%2BlVAjwtbwgOa82iBMPap4%3D

Stede, W. A. Van der, Chow, C. W., & Lin, T. W. (2006). Strategy, choice of performance measures, and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18(1), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.185

Yanuar. (2017). Compensation, motivation and performance of employees: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 486–492.