Analisis Aksesibilitas Website Pemerintah Provinsi Indonesia Sebagai Implementasi Corporate Digital Responsibility terhadap E-Government
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid development of ICT raises risks that can occur, such as the accessibility of digital information by persons with disabilities. Accessibility is an aspect of equality that has been recognized by Indonesia, particularly access to information and public services such as the government website. However, previous findings show that government websites in various countries do not have good accessibility. It requires an understanding of corporate digital responsibility in managing government websites so that accessibility can be implemented effectively. This research is conducted to analyze the accessibility of Indonesian provincial government websites as a form of CDR implementation for e-government. This study uses a quantitative content analysis method, by utilizing aXe DevTools as an automatic accessibility evaluation tool to collect data from 34 provincial government websites. The accessibility standard used in analyzing websites is WCAG 2.1 by W3C. This research found that the 34 provincial government websites had a total of 2,088 accessibility violations with 24 types of accessibility errors categorized into 3 accessibility issues category. These violations were found to greatly affect persons with disabilities, with different needs and abilities, in accessing public information on the provincial government website. A review of website management needs to be carried out to ensure that information on the website can be accessed by all levels of society. Apart from that, the role of government public relations practitioners also needs to be emphasized again to ensure that all information in government communication activities can be accessed by all levels of society, especially people with disabilities.
Pesatnya perkembangan TIK dapat menimbulkan risiko seperti aksesibilitas informasi digital oleh penyandang disabilitas. Aksesibilitas merupakan aspek kesetaraan yang telah diakui oleh Indonesia, termasuk akses terhadap informasi dan layanan publik seperti website pemerintah. Namun ditemukan bahwa website pemerintah dari berbagai negara tidak memiliki aksesibilitas yang baik. Diperlukan adanya pemahaman tentang corporate digital responsibility dalam mengelola website pemerintah agar aksesibilitas dapat diterapkan secara efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aksesibilitas website pemerintah provinsi Indonesia sebagai bentuk implementasi CDR terhadap e-government. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis isi kuantitatif, dengan memanfaatkan axe DevTools sebagai alat evaluasi aksesibilitas otomatis untuk mengumpulkan data dari 34 websitepemerintah provinsi. Acuan standar aksesibilitas yang digunakan adalah WCAG 2.1 by W3C. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa 34 website pemerintah provinsi memiliki total 2.088 pelanggaran aksesibilitas dengan 24 jenis error yang dikategorikan ke dalam 3 kategori issues. Pelanggaran tersebut mempengaruhi penyandang disabilitas, dengan kebutuhan dan kemampuan yang berbeda, dalam mengakses informasi publik pada website pemerintah provinsi. Peninjauan ulang pengelolaan website perlu dilakukan untuk memastikan kembali informasi pada website dapat diakses oleh seluruh kalangan masyarakat. Selain itu, peran praktisi humas pemerintah juga perlu ditekankan kembali untuk memastikan setiap informasi dalam aktivitas komunikasi pemerintah dapat terakses oleh semua kalangan masyarakat, khususnya penyandang disabilitas.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Prologia Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.References
Acosta, T., Acosta-Vargas, P., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2018). Accessibility of eGovernment Services in Latin America. 2018 5th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2018, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2018.8372332
Ahmad, J. (2018). Desain Penelitian Analisis Isi (Content Analysis). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12201.08804
Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2016). EVALUATING ACCESSIBILITY OF MALAYSIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES WEBSITES USING ACHECKER AND WAVE. In Journal of ICT (Vol. 15, Issue 2). http://jict.uum.edu.my
AkgÜL, Y., & Vatansever, K. (2016). Web Accessibility Evaluation of Government Websites for People with Disabilities in Turkey. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.3.201-210
Annur, C. (2023, May 30). Media Sosial, Sumber Informasi Utama Masyarakat Indonesia. Https://Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id/Index.Php/Datapublish/2023/05/30/Media-Sosial-Sumber-Informasi-Utama-Masyarakat-Indonesia.
Arasid, W., Abdullah, A. G., Wahyudin, D., Abdullah, C. U., Widiaty, I., Zakaria, D., Amelia, N., & Juhana, A. (2018). An Analysis of Website Accessibility in Higher Education in Indonesia Based on WCAG 2.0 Guidelines. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012130
Budiastuti Wiratmo, L., Irfan, N., & Kuwatono. (2017). WEBSITE PEMERINTAH DAERAH SEBAGAI SARANA ONLINE PUBLIC RELATIONS. http://www.stephaneprudhomme.com/
Deastu, A. D., Marthasari, G. I., & Sn, V. R. (2020). Analisis Aksesibilitas Website Pemerintah Provinsi di Indonesia Menggunakan Pedoman Web Content Accessible Guidelines 2.0. REPOSITOR, 2(10), 1338–1348. http://www.jatimprov.go.id
Deque. (2022, March 24). Issues Impact. Https://Github.Com/Dequelabs/Axe-Core/Blob/Develop/Doc/Issue_impact.Md.
Fithriyaningrum, D., Kusumawardhani, S., & Wibirama, S. (2021). Analisis Aksesibilitas Website berdasarkan Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG): Ulasan Literatur Sistematis An Analysis of Website Accessibility Based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG): A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komunikasi, 23(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.33169/iptekkom.23.1.2021.79-92
Gandhawangi, S. (2023, January 3). Pemberdayaan Penyandang Disabilitas Dimulai dari Pendataan. Https://Www.Kompas.Id/Baca/Humaniora/2023/01/03/Pemberdayaan-Penyandang-Disabilitas-Dimulai-Dari-Pendataan#:~:Text=Menurut%20Badan%20Pusat%20Statistik%20(BPS,28,05%20juta%20penyandang%20disabilitas.
Hafiar, H., Lukman, S., Limilia, P., Caesarendra, W., & Amin, K. (2022). Accessibility Concerns on COVID-19 Information Websites for Persons with Disability. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v7i2.677
Kemp, S. (2023, February 9). DIGITAL 2023: INDONESIA. Https://Datareportal.Com/Reports/Digital-2023-Indonesia.
Koesno. (2021). Hari Disabilitas Internasional: WHO Rilis Fakta Terkait Disabilitas.
Król, K., & Zdonek, D. (2020). Local government website accessibility—evidence from poland. Administrative Sciences, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10020022
Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2017). PERATURAN MENTERI KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMATIKA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PENYELENGGARAAN PORTAL DAN SITUS WEB BADAN PEMERINTAHAN. Https://Web.Kominfo.Go.Id/Sites/Default/Files/Users/4761/RPM%20Web%20Portal%20Mohon%20Uji%20Publik_0.Pdf.
Mohamed, F. (2022). The Role of Social Responsibility in the Digital Public Relations Age. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 423). Springer, Cham.
Pemerintah Pusat Republik Indonesia. (2016). UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2016. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/37251/uu-no-8-tahun-2016
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2020). PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 42 TAHUN 2O2O TENTANG AKSESIBILITAS TERHADAP PERMUKIMAN, PELAYANAN PUBLIK, DAN PELINDUNGAN DARI BENCANA BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS.
Sanchez-Gordon, S., Lujan-Mora, S., & Sanchez-Gordon, M. (2020). E-Government Accessibility in Ecuador: A Preliminary Evaluation. 2020 7th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2020, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096766
Satira, U., & Hidriani, 2rossa. (2021). Peran Penting Public Relations Di Era Digital.
Suchacka, M. (2020). Corporate Digital Responsibility - A New Dimension of the Human - Technology Relations. System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2020-0001
Sumartias, S., Hafiar, H., Amin, K., Limilia, P., & Prastowo, A. A. (2022). Labour union’s website accessibility and information rights fulfilment among workers with disability. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 6(3), 859 - 870. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v6i3.4952
Verčič, D., Verčič, A. T., & Sriramesh, K. (2015). Looking for digital in public relations. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.002
W3C. (2023a). World Wide Web Consortium. Https://Www.W3.Org
W3C. (2023b, April 19). WCAG 2 Overview. Https://Www.W3.Org/WAI/Standards-Guidelines/Wcag/