Alat Ukur Keasyikan Kerja: Studi Validitas Isi Versi Indonesia yang Telah Dimodifikasi
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 324
Download : 0
Main Article Content
Abstract
UWES-9 (Schaufeli et al., 2006) merupakan alat ukur popular yang sering dipergunakan untuk penelitian mengenai keasyikan kerja. UWES-9 memiliki jumlah butir yang sedikit, hingga dianggap efisien dalam melakukan administrasi pengukuran, namun tetap valid dalam mengukur konstruk yang akan diukur. Namun demikian, UWES-9 memiliki beberapa kritik, yaitu: tidak dilengkapi dengan butir negatif, memiliki format yang berpotensi direspons secara spontan, serta belum memiliki informasi psikometri terkait content validation study. Untuk mengatasi beberapa kritik tersebut, penulis melakukan modifikasi terhadap alat ukur UWES-9 dalam versi Bahasa Indonesia. Modifikasi dilakukan dengan penambahan butir negatif dan dengan mengubah format respons ke dalam bentuk bipolar. Untuk menguji validitas hasil modifikasi, penulis mengajukan permohonan kepada lima orang pakar. Pakar melakukan penilaian terhadap 12 butir work engagement yang dimodifikasi. Berdasarkan hasil penilaian, didapatkan alat ukur work engagement versi Bahasa Indonesia yang berjumlah 11 butir (terlampir). Untuk memperoleh informasi psikometri (construct validity, criterion validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, dll.), masih perlu dilakukan proses penelitian lebih lanjut.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Penulis yang mempublikasikan jurnal ini setuju dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut:
- Penulis mempertahankan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak publikasi pertama dengan pekerjaan secara bersamaan berlisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan pengakuan kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal di jurnal ini.
- Penulis mampu untuk masuk ke dalam terpisah, pengaturan kontrak tambahan untuk distribusi non-eksklusif versi diterbitkan jurnal pekerjaan (misalnya, posting ke sebuah repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan publikasi awal di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengirim karya mereka secara online.
References
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206. doi:10.1348/096317909x402596 Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement,
particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. doi:10.1037/0022-
99.2.274
Bass, B. I., Cigularov, K. P., Chen, P. Y., Henry, K. L., Tomazic, R. G., & Li, Y. (2016). The effects of student
violence against school employees on employee burnout and work engagement: The roles of perceived school unsafety and transformational leadership. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(3), 318–336. doi:10.1037/str0000011
Beersma, B., Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Outcome interdependence shapes the effectsofpreventionfocusonteamprocesses andperformance.OrganizationalBehaviorandHumanDecision Processes, 121(2), 194–203. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.02.003
Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928–951. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.651313
Bickerton, G. R., & Miner, M. H. (2019). The interrelationships between spiritual resources and work engagement. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. doi:10.1037/rel0000253
Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. doi: 10.1590/1982- 43272253201314
Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Daily job demands and employee work engagement: The role of daily transformational leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 338–349. doi:10.1037/ocp0000082
Chaudhary, R. (2014). A multilevel investigation of the factors influencing work engagement. The Psychologist- Manager Journal, 17(2), 128-158. doi:10.1037/mgr0000017
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482
Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G., & Mahembe, B. (2017). Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 368–379. doi:10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0237
Ferreira, A. I., da Costa Ferreira, P., Cooper, C. L., & Oliveira, D. (2019). How daily negative affect and emotional exhaustion correlates with work engagement and presenteeism-constrained productivity. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/str0000114
Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2006). Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 873-884. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015
Halbesleben,J.R.B.,Wheeler,A.R.,&Shanine,K.K.(2013).Themoderating roleofattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the work engagement performance process. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 132– 143. doi:10.1037/a0031978
Iswanto, F., & Agustina, I. (2016). Peran dukungan sosial di tempat kerja terhadap keterikatan kerja karyawan. Mediapsi, 2(2), 38-45. doi: 10.21776/ub.mps.2016.002.02.6
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., & Mantler, J. (2015). An assessment of the overlap between morale and work engagement in a nonoperational military sample. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(3), 338–347. doi:10.1037/a0038559
Jessyca, J., & Y. S. Suyasa, P. (2021). Uji validitas isi Tarumanagara Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. Jurnal
Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 5(1), 189–198. doi: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v5i1.9987.2021
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. doi:10.5465/256287
Kaltiainen, J., Lipponen, J., Fugate, M., & Vakola, M. (2019). Spiraling work engagement and change appraisals: A three-wave longitudinal study during organizational change. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/ocp0000163
Kim, S., Park, Y. A., & Headrick, L. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 772–786. doi:10.1037/apl0000308
Kristiana, I. F., Fajrianthi, Purwono, U. (2018). Analisis rasch dalam utrecht work engagement scale-9 (uwes-9) versi bahasaindonesia. JurnalPsikologi,17(2),204-217.doi:10.14710/jp.17.2.204-217
Lu, L., Lu, A. C. C., Gursoy, D., & Neale, N. R. (2016). Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(4), 737–761. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2014-0360
Macey, W. H., & Schenider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. doi:10.1111/j.17549434.2007.0002.x
Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149–171. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002
Nurnaeni, U. (2017). Gambaran kinerja dan keterikatan kerja pada pegawai pengelola barang/jasa pemerintah. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 1(2), 473-480. doi:10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i2.1474 Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1–2), 75–94.
doi:10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0040
Pekasa, E., & Rostiana. (2018). Peran job embeddedness terhadap kinerja dengan keterikatan kerja dan keinginan
untuk menetap sebagai mediator. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 2(1), 335-341.
doi:10.24912/jmishumsen.v2i1.1635 Penny,A.M.,Waschbusch,D.A.,Klein,R.M.,Corkum,P.,&Eskes,G.(2009). Developingameasureofsluggish
cognitive tempo for children: content validity, factor structure, and reliability. Psychological Assessment, 21(3),
–389. doi:10.1037/a0016600
Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J. P., Massoudi, K., Györkös, C., Becker, J., de Bruin, G. P., & Rossier, J. (2015). Influence of
individual characteristics on work engagement and job stress in a sample of national and foreign workers in
Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 17–27. doi:10.1024/1421- 0185/a000146
Robbaanii, M. M., Baihaqi, M. I. F., & Juwitaningrum, I. (2019). Efek keterampilan sosial dan job crafting terhadap
keterikatan kerja. Jurnal Psikologi Insight, 3(2), 43-55. doi:10.17509/insight.v3i2.22344
Rocereto, J. F., Puzakova, M., Anderson, R. E., & Kwak, H. (2011). The role of response formats on extreme response style: A case of Likert-type vs. semantic differential scales. Measurement And Research Methods In
International Marketing. 22. 53-71. doi: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022006
Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Family supportive supervisor behaviors and organizational
culture: Effects on work engagement and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 207–
doi:10.1037/ocp0000036
Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-684. doi:10.2307/3094827
Sajuthi, P. P., Tumanggor, R. O., & Suyasa, P. T. Y. S. (2020). Peran self-efficacy sebagai mediator antara job
resources dan work engagement pada dokter hewan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 4(2),
–376. doi: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v4i2.3495
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology,
(7), 600-619. doi: 10.1108/02683940610690169
Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893-917. doi: 10.1002/job.595
Sheng, X., Wang, Y., Hong, W., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2019). The curvilinear relationship between daily time pressure and work engagement: The role of psychological capital and sleep. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(1), 25–35. doi:10.1037/str0000085
Sugiarto, W., Suyasa, P. T. Y. S., & Lie, D. (2017). Peran conscientiousness sebagai moderator dari hubungan job resources dan work engagement karyawan information technology (IT) pada PT. X. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni 1(1), 296-303.
Tiara, S., & Rostiana. (2018). Peran kualitas kehidupan kerja dan grit terhadap keterikatan kerja pada generasi millenial di industri perbankan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 2(1), 342-349. doi:10.24912/jmishumsen.v2i1.1631
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681. doi:10.5465/AMR.1990.4310926
Van den Tooren, M., & Rutte, C. (2016). Explaining emotional exhaustion and work engagement: The role of job demands-resources and type D personality. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(2), 147–166. doi:10.1037/a0039754
Van Wingerden, J., Derks., D., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). The impact of personal resources and job crafting interventions on work engagement and performance. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 51-67. doi:10.1002/hrm.21758
Vazquez, A. C. S., Magnan, E. D. S., Pacico, J. C., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico-usf, 20(2), 207-217. doi:10.1590/1413- 82712015200202