Alat Ukur Keasyikan Kerja: Studi Validitas Isi Versi Indonesia yang Telah Dimodifikasi

Amala Fahditia; P. Tommy Y. S. Suyasa; Stephanie Angelina

Authors

Amala Fahditia Universitas Tarumanagara
P. Tommy Y. S. Suyasa Universitas Tarumanagara
Stephanie Angelina Universitas Tarumanagara

Keywords:

versi indonesia, skala keterikatan kerja, validitas konten, format respon

Abstract

UWES-9 (Schaufeli et al., 2006) merupakan alat ukur popular yang sering dipergunakan untuk penelitian mengenai keasyikan kerja. UWES-9 memiliki jumlah butir yang sedikit, hingga dianggap efisien dalam melakukan administrasi pengukuran, namun tetap valid dalam mengukur konstruk yang akan diukur. Namun demikian, UWES-9 memiliki beberapa kritik, yaitu: tidak dilengkapi dengan butir negatif, memiliki format yang berpotensi direspons secara spontan, serta belum memiliki informasi psikometri terkait content validation study. Untuk mengatasi beberapa kritik tersebut, penulis melakukan modifikasi terhadap alat ukur UWES-9 dalam versi Bahasa Indonesia. Modifikasi dilakukan dengan penambahan butir negatif dan dengan mengubah format respons ke dalam bentuk bipolar. Untuk menguji validitas hasil modifikasi, penulis mengajukan permohonan kepada lima orang pakar. Pakar melakukan penilaian terhadap 12 butir work engagement yang dimodifikasi. Berdasarkan hasil penilaian, didapatkan alat ukur work engagement versi Bahasa Indonesia yang berjumlah 11 butir (terlampir). Untuk memperoleh informasi psikometri (construct validity, criterion validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, dll.), masih perlu dilakukan proses penelitian lebih lanjut.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206. doi:10.1348/096317909x402596 Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement,

particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. doi:10.1037/0022-

99.2.274

Bass, B. I., Cigularov, K. P., Chen, P. Y., Henry, K. L., Tomazic, R. G., & Li, Y. (2016). The effects of student

violence against school employees on employee burnout and work engagement: The roles of perceived school unsafety and transformational leadership. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(3), 318–336. doi:10.1037/str0000011

Beersma, B., Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Outcome interdependence shapes the effectsofpreventionfocusonteamprocesses andperformance.OrganizationalBehaviorandHumanDecision Processes, 121(2), 194–203. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.02.003

Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928–951. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.651313

Bickerton, G. R., & Miner, M. H. (2019). The interrelationships between spiritual resources and work engagement. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. doi:10.1037/rel0000253

Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. doi: 10.1590/1982- 43272253201314

Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Daily job demands and employee work engagement: The role of daily transformational leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 338–349. doi:10.1037/ocp0000082

Chaudhary, R. (2014). A multilevel investigation of the factors influencing work engagement. The Psychologist- Manager Journal, 17(2), 128-158. doi:10.1037/mgr0000017

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482

Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G., & Mahembe, B. (2017). Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 368–379. doi:10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0237

Ferreira, A. I., da Costa Ferreira, P., Cooper, C. L., & Oliveira, D. (2019). How daily negative affect and emotional exhaustion correlates with work engagement and presenteeism-constrained productivity. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/str0000114

Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2006). Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 873-884. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015

Halbesleben,J.R.B.,Wheeler,A.R.,&Shanine,K.K.(2013).Themoderating roleofattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the work engagement performance process. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 132– 143. doi:10.1037/a0031978

Iswanto, F., & Agustina, I. (2016). Peran dukungan sosial di tempat kerja terhadap keterikatan kerja karyawan. Mediapsi, 2(2), 38-45. doi: 10.21776/ub.mps.2016.002.02.6

Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., & Mantler, J. (2015). An assessment of the overlap between morale and work engagement in a nonoperational military sample. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(3), 338–347. doi:10.1037/a0038559

Jessyca, J., & Y. S. Suyasa, P. (2021). Uji validitas isi Tarumanagara Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. Jurnal

Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 5(1), 189–198. doi: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v5i1.9987.2021

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. doi:10.5465/256287

Kaltiainen, J., Lipponen, J., Fugate, M., & Vakola, M. (2019). Spiraling work engagement and change appraisals: A three-wave longitudinal study during organizational change. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/ocp0000163

Kim, S., Park, Y. A., & Headrick, L. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 772–786. doi:10.1037/apl0000308

Kristiana, I. F., Fajrianthi, Purwono, U. (2018). Analisis rasch dalam utrecht work engagement scale-9 (uwes-9) versi bahasaindonesia. JurnalPsikologi,17(2),204-217.doi:10.14710/jp.17.2.204-217

Lu, L., Lu, A. C. C., Gursoy, D., & Neale, N. R. (2016). Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(4), 737–761. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2014-0360

Macey, W. H., & Schenider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. doi:10.1111/j.17549434.2007.0002.x

Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149–171. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002

Nurnaeni, U. (2017). Gambaran kinerja dan keterikatan kerja pada pegawai pengelola barang/jasa pemerintah. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 1(2), 473-480. doi:10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i2.1474 Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1–2), 75–94.

doi:10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0040

Pekasa, E., & Rostiana. (2018). Peran job embeddedness terhadap kinerja dengan keterikatan kerja dan keinginan

untuk menetap sebagai mediator. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 2(1), 335-341.

doi:10.24912/jmishumsen.v2i1.1635 Penny,A.M.,Waschbusch,D.A.,Klein,R.M.,Corkum,P.,&Eskes,G.(2009). Developingameasureofsluggish

cognitive tempo for children: content validity, factor structure, and reliability. Psychological Assessment, 21(3),

–389. doi:10.1037/a0016600

Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J. P., Massoudi, K., Györkös, C., Becker, J., de Bruin, G. P., & Rossier, J. (2015). Influence of

individual characteristics on work engagement and job stress in a sample of national and foreign workers in

Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 17–27. doi:10.1024/1421- 0185/a000146

Robbaanii, M. M., Baihaqi, M. I. F., & Juwitaningrum, I. (2019). Efek keterampilan sosial dan job crafting terhadap

keterikatan kerja. Jurnal Psikologi Insight, 3(2), 43-55. doi:10.17509/insight.v3i2.22344

Rocereto, J. F., Puzakova, M., Anderson, R. E., & Kwak, H. (2011). The role of response formats on extreme response style: A case of Likert-type vs. semantic differential scales. Measurement And Research Methods In

International Marketing. 22. 53-71. doi: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022006

Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Family supportive supervisor behaviors and organizational

culture: Effects on work engagement and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 207–

doi:10.1037/ocp0000036

Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-684. doi:10.2307/3094827

Sajuthi, P. P., Tumanggor, R. O., & Suyasa, P. T. Y. S. (2020). Peran self-efficacy sebagai mediator antara job

resources dan work engagement pada dokter hewan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 4(2),

–376. doi: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v4i2.3495

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology,

(7), 600-619. doi: 10.1108/02683940610690169

Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893-917. doi: 10.1002/job.595

Sheng, X., Wang, Y., Hong, W., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2019). The curvilinear relationship between daily time pressure and work engagement: The role of psychological capital and sleep. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(1), 25–35. doi:10.1037/str0000085

Sugiarto, W., Suyasa, P. T. Y. S., & Lie, D. (2017). Peran conscientiousness sebagai moderator dari hubungan job resources dan work engagement karyawan information technology (IT) pada PT. X. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni 1(1), 296-303.

Tiara, S., & Rostiana. (2018). Peran kualitas kehidupan kerja dan grit terhadap keterikatan kerja pada generasi millenial di industri perbankan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 2(1), 342-349. doi:10.24912/jmishumsen.v2i1.1631

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681. doi:10.5465/AMR.1990.4310926

Van den Tooren, M., & Rutte, C. (2016). Explaining emotional exhaustion and work engagement: The role of job demands-resources and type D personality. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(2), 147–166. doi:10.1037/a0039754

Van Wingerden, J., Derks., D., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). The impact of personal resources and job crafting interventions on work engagement and performance. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 51-67. doi:10.1002/hrm.21758

Vazquez, A. C. S., Magnan, E. D. S., Pacico, J. C., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico-usf, 20(2), 207-217. doi:10.1590/1413- 82712015200202