Pengaruh consumer perception dan consumer personality terhadap purchase intention kendaraan listrik di Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether consumer personality, namely personal innovativeness and environmental concern, is mediated by consumer perceptions in terms of positive utility, namely perceived monetary benefit, perceived environment, and perceived symbol, and negative utility, namely perceived risk and perceived fee, influence the intention to purchase an electric car in Indonesia. The research data used primary data with a questionnaire method consisting of 257 respondents, but only 238 respondents were valid. The results showed that consumer personality has a positive influence on the intention to purchase an electric car both directly and through positive and negative consumer perceptions, consumer personality has a positive influence on consumers’ positive perceptions, and consumers’ positive perceptions have a positive influence on the intention to purchase an electric car except perceived environment, then consumer personality has a negative effect on consumers’ negative perceptions and consumers’ negative perceptions have a negative effect on the intention to purchase an electric car.
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah kepribadian konsumen, yaitu inovasi pribadi dan kepedulian lingkungan yang dimediasi oleh persepsi konsumen dari segi utilitas positif, yaitu perceived monetary benefit, perceived environment, dan perceived symbol dan segi utilitas negatif, yaitu perceived risk dan perceived fee terhadap niat pembelian mobil listrik di Indonesia. Data penelitian menggunakan data primer dengan kuesioner yang terdiri dari 257 data responden, tetapi hanya 238 data responden yang valid. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepribadian konsumen berpengaruh positif terhadap niat pembelian mobil listrik baik secara langsung maupun melalui persepsi positif dan negatif konsumen, kepribadian konsumen berpengaruh positif terhadap persepsi positif konsumen, dan persepsi positif konsumen berpengaruh positif terhadap niat pembelian mobil listrik kecuali perceived environment, kemudian kepribadian konsumen berpengaruh negatif terhadap persepsi negatif konsumen, dan persepsi negatif konsumen berpengaruh negatif terhadap niat pembelian mobil listrik.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmad, I., Syed, F., Naseer, S., & Rasool, G. (2018). Environmental concern as an underlying mechanism between environmental beliefs and green purchase intentions. South Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 12(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.21621/sajms.2018121.05
Al-Jundi, S. A., Shuhaiber, A., & Augustine, R. (2019). Effect of consumer innovativeness on new product purchase intentions through learning process and perceived value. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1698849
Ali, I., & Naushad, M. (2022). A Study to Investigate What Tempts Consumers to Adopt Electric Vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 13(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13020026
Barth, M., Jugert, P., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Still underdetected - Social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in Germany. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 37, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.011
Boyle, R. J., & Ruppel, C. P. (2006). The effects of personal innovativeness, perceived risk, and computer self-efficacy on online purchasing intent. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 15(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1168
Chauhan, V., Yadav, R., & Choudhary, V. (2019). Analyzing the impact of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in internet banking adoption: A study of Indian consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(1), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2018-0028
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216250
Chetioui, Y., Benlafqih, H., & Lebdaoui, H. (2020). How fashion influencers contribute to consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2019-0157
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In Handbook of Environmental Sociology (pp. 482–524). Greenwood Press.
Egbue, O., Long, S., & Samaranayake, V. A. (2017). Mass deployment of sustainable transportation: evaluation of factors that influence electric vehicle adoption. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(7), 1927–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1375-4
Fennis, B. M., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2007). You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. Journal of Business Research, 60(6), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.013
Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectations, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049910256122
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Models (2016th ed.). Statistical Associates Publishing.
Goodwin, N. R. (1996). Economic meanings of trust and responsibility. The University of Michigan Press.
Greaves, M., Zibarras, L. D., & Stride, C. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Abedini Koshksaray, A., & Jalilvand Shirkhani Tabar, M. (2014). Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2012.11.001
He, X., Zhan, W., & Hu, Y. (2018). Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.260
Higueras-Castillo, E., Kalinic, Z., Marinkovic, V., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). A mixed analysis of perceptions of electric and hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy, 136, 111076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111076
Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011052396
Jiang, Y., & Kim, Y. (2015). Developing multi-dimensional green value extending social exchange theory to explore customers’ purchase intention in green hotels-evidence from Korea. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(2), 308–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-2013-0383
Junquera, B., Moreno, B., & Álvarez, R. (2016). Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: Technological limitations and vehicle confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006
Kim, M. K., Oh, J., Park, J. H., & Joo, C. (2018). Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports. Energy, 159, 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.064
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119911
Langbroek, J. H. M., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.050
Lashari, Z. A., Ko, J., & Jang, J. (2021). Consumers’ intention to purchase electric vehicles: Influences of user attitude and perception. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12), 6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126778
Li, L., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Liao, A. (2021). Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.002
Liu, F., Zhao, X., Chau, P. Y. K., & Tang, Q. (2015). Roles of perceived value and individual differences in the acceptance of mobile coupon applications. Internet Research, 25(3), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-02-2014-0053
Lu, X., Sheng, T., Zhou, X., Shen, C., & Fang, B. (2022). How does young consumers’ greenwashing perception impact their green purchase intention in the fast fashion industry? An analysis from the perspective of perceived risk theory. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20), 13473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013473
Malhotra, N. K. (2015). Essentials of marketing research: A hands-on orientation. Pearson Education.
Namahoot, K. S., & Jantasri, V. (2023). Integration of UTAUT model in Thailand cashless payment system adoption: The mediating role of perceived risk and trust. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(4), 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2020-0102
Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012
Oliver, J., & Rosen, D. (2010). Applying the environmental propensity framework: A segmented approach to hybrid electric vehicle marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180405
Peter, J. P., & Tarpey, Sr., L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1086/208613
Reyvina, & Tunjungsari, H. K. (2022). The effect of consumer innovativeness on purchase intention of new smartphone with vicarious innovativeness and perceived value as mediations. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management 2021 (ICEBM 2021), 653. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220501.088
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. The Free Press.
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
Song, J. (2014). Understanding the adoption of mobile innovation in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.016
Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J. W., & Chen, T. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029
Yang, S., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., Cao, Y., & Zhang, R. (2012). Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.019