Factors affecting purchasing behavior on marketplace applications in Jakarta during the Covid-19 period
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to test the analysis of factors that influence purchasing behavior on marketplace applications, especially in the Jakarta area during the Covid-19 period. The sample taken was 132 respondents in the Jakarta area. The convenience method is used by distributing questionnaires which are then processed using PLS-SEM. The result of this study is that purchasing intentions when shopping in marketplace applications during the Covid-19 period in the Jakarta area are influenced by trust, safety, and risks.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi perilaku pembelian pada aplikasi marketplace khususnya di wilayah Jakarta dalam masa Covid-19. Sampel yang diambil adalah 132 responden di wilayah Jakarta. Metode convenience digunakan dengan cara menyebarkan kuesioner yang kemudian diolah menggunakan PLS-SEM. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah keputusan pembelian dipengaruhi oleh kepercayaan, keamanan, dan risiko pada saat berbelanja dalam aplikasi marketplace pada masa Covid-19 di wilayah Jakarta.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Mandal, P. (2006). Effectiveness of information systems in supply chain performance: A system dynamics study. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 1(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2006.011198
Bianchi, C., & Andrews, L. (2012). Risk, trust, and consumer online purchasing behaviour: A Chilean perspective. International Marketing Review, 29(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331211229750
Chen, Y. F., & Lu, H. F. (2015). We-commerce: Exploring factors influencing online group-buying intention in Taiwan from a conformity perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12083
Forsythe, S., Liu, C., Shannon, D., & Gardner, L. C. (2006). Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(2), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20061
Franklyn, A. K. J., & Cokki. (2021). Determinan loyalitas konsumen situs Tokopedia di Jakarta. Jurnal Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan, 3(4), 893–903. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmk.v3i4.13430
Gefen, D. (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00022
Gershoff, A. D., & Johar, G. V. (2006). Do you know me? Consumer calibration of friends’ knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1086/500479
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris (2nd ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ha, H. Y. (2002). The effects of consumer risk perception on pre-purchase information in online auctions: Brand, word-of-mouth, and customized information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1), JCMC813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00160.x
Hahn, K. H., & Kim, J. (2009). The effect of offline brand trust and perceived internet confidence on online shopping intention in the integrated multi-channel context. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 37(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550910934272
Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. Wiley.
Li, W., & Yuan, Y. (2018). Purchase experience and involvement for risk perception in online group buying. Nankai Business Review International, 9(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-11-2017-0064
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x
Mitchell, V. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1–2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229
Roozy, E., Arastoo, M. A., & Vazifehdust, H. (2014). Effect of brand equity on consumer purchase intention. Indian Journal of Scientific Research (IJSR), 6(1), 212–217.
Tjokrosaputro, M., & Cokki. (2020). Peran innovativeness sebagai moderasi pada keterkaitan pengaruh sosial terhadap minat pembelian kopi Starbucks. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v4i1.7588
We Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2022, January 26). Digital 2022: Another year of bumper growth. Digital 2022 Global Overview Report. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/
Winch, G., & Joyce, P. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of building, and losing, consumer trust in B2C eBusiness. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 34(7), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550610673617
Zhao, X., Deng, S., & Zhou, Y. (2017). The impact of reference effects on online purchase intention of agricultural products: The moderating role of consumers’ food safety consciousness. Internet Research, 27(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2016-0082