Pengaruh organizational identification terhadap employees innovative work behavior melalui employee engagement sebagai variabel mediasi dan creative self-efficacy sebagai variabel moderasi pada karyawan start-up di Jakarta

Main Article Content

Jordi Jayapradesta
Carunia Mulya Firdausy

Abstract

This research aims to examine the influence of organizational identification on employees’ innovative work behavior through employee engagement as a mediating variable and creative self-efficacy as a moderating variable in start-up employees in Jakarta. Five hypotheses were developed according to the number of independent variables with mediation and moderation. The number sample of respondents in this study was 92 employees who worked at start-up companies in Jakarta. The method used to analyze the data was by applying PLS-SEM. The results show that organizational identification influences employee engagement at start-up companies in Jakarta. Also, employee engagement influences employees’ innovative work behavior at start-up companies in Jakarta. Organizational identification influences employee innovative work behavior in start-up companies in Jakarta. Organizational identification influences employee innovative work behavior through employee engagement in start-up companies in Jakarta, and creative self-efficacy moderates the influence of employee engagement on employees’ innovativeness work behavior at start-up companies in Jakarta. Therefore, start-up companies in Jakarta need to evaluate the level of employee engagement at work, to start implementing education and training for companies regarding the importance of recognition and attachment to the company and how the added value of innovative behavior in employees, as well as to further pay attention to the level of employee engagement by paying attention to determining factors such as employee psychological factors so that you can identify the characteristics of employees who have high employee engagement.


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh organizational identification terhadap employees’ innovative work behavior melalui employee engagement sebagai variabel mediasi dan creative self-efficacy sebagai variabel moderasi pada karyawan start-up di Jakarta. Dikembangkan 5 hipotesis sesuai dengan banyaknya variabel bebas dengan mediasi dan moderasi. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 92 karyawan yang bekerja di perusahaan start-up di Jakarta. Untuk mengolah data-datanya, peneliti menggunakan program SmartPLS untuk uji validitas dan reliabilitas serta pengolahan data, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa organizational identification berpengaruh terhadap employee engagement karyawan pada perusahaan start-up di Jakarta, employee engagement berpengaruh terhadap employees’ innovative work behavior karyawan pada perusahaan start-up di Jakarta, organizational identification berpengaruh terhadap employees’ innovative work behavior karyawan pada perusahaan start-up di Jakarta, organizational identification berpengaruh terhadap employees’ innovative work behavior karyawan melalui employee engagement pada perusahaan start-up di Jakarta, dan creative self-efficacy memoderasi pengaruh employee engagement terhadap employees’ innovative work behavior karyawan pada perusahaan start-up di Jakarta. Kontribusi penelitian ini sangat disarankan kepada para pihak perusahaan start-up di Jakarta untuk mengevaluasi tingkat engagement karyawan yang bekerja, untuk mulai menerapkan edukasi dan training kepada perusahaan mengenai pentingnya pengenalan dan keterikatan terhadap perusahaan serta bagaimana nilai lebih dari perilaku inovatif pada karyawan, serta untuk lebih memerhatikan tingkat keterikatan karyawan dengan cara memerhatikan faktor-faktor yang menentukan seperti faktor psikologis karyawan agar dapat diketahui ciri-ciri karyawan yang memiliki keterikatan kerja tinggi.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jayapradesta, J., & Firdausy, C. M. (2024). Pengaruh organizational identification terhadap employees innovative work behavior melalui employee engagement sebagai variabel mediasi dan creative self-efficacy sebagai variabel moderasi pada karyawan start-up di Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 8(2), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmbk.v8i2.29693
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Jordi Jayapradesta, Universitas Tarumanagara

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Program Pascasarjana

Carunia Mulya Firdausy, Universitas Tarumanagara

Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Manajemen, Program Pascasarjana

References

Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082–1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0008

Avanzi, L., Schuh, S. C., Fraccaroli, F., & van Dick, R. (2015). Why does organizational identification relate to reduced employee burnout? The mediating influence of social support and collective efficacy. Work and Stress, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1004225

Barsh, J., Capozzi, M. M., & Davidson, J. (2008). Leadership and innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, 12(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673202-10

Brikman, Y. (2015). Hello, startup: A programmer’s guide to building products, technologies, and teams. O’Reilly Media.

Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001

DeZure, D., Shaw, A., & Rojewski, J. (2014). Cultivating the next generation of academic leaders: Implications for administrators and faculty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.842102

Dihni, V. A. (2022, May 25). Distribusi perusahaan startup RI menurut jumlah karyawan (2021). databoks.katadata.co.id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/05/25/ramai-isu-phk-mayoritas-startup-ri-punya-karyawan-di-bawah-50-orang

Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s generation Z. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3), 250–252. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17556

Estherina, Y., Puspitarini, E. S., & Rachmawati, R. (2019). Pengaruh dari identifikasi organisasi terhadap keterikatan kerja karyawan: studi kasus pada dosen di Universitas Patron. Civil Service: Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS, 13(2), 73–82. https://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/asn/article/view/224

Fritz, C., & van Knippenberg, D. (2017). Gender and leadership aspiration: The impact of organizational identification. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(8), 1018–1037. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2016-0120

Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Models (2016th ed.). Statistical Associates Publishing.

Hui, L., Qun, W., Nazir, S., Mengyu, Z., Asadullah, M. A., & Khadim, S. (2020). Organizational identification perceptions and millennials’ creativity: Testing the mediating role of work engagement and the moderating role of work values. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1653–1678. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0165

Husin, N. H., Abu Mansor, N. N., Kelana, B. W. Y., & Sondoh Jr., S. L. (2021). Employee participation and innovative work behaviour: The mediation effect of work engagement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i7/10571

Karadeniz, B., Erzurum, E., Akcan, A. F., & Zaim, S. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. 16th International Strategic Management Conference, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.12.04.14

Kuhn, J. S., & Marsick, V. J. (2005). Action learning for strategic innovation in mature organizations: key cognitive, design and contextual considerations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330500041236

Newman, A., Tse, H. H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001

Pian, Q. Y., Jin, H., & Li, H. (2019). Linking knowledge sharing to innovative behavior: The moderating role of collectivism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1652–1672. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0753

Qiu, L. (2021). The impact of paternalistic leadership on organization identification: A moderated mediation model. 2020 International Conference on New Energy Technology and Industrial Development (NETID 2020), 235, 02077. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123502077

Rao, V. (2016). Innovation through employee engagement. Second Asia Pacific Conference on Advanced Research, 2(2), 1–9. https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/26_APJABSS_APCAR_BRR710_BUS-337-345.pdf

Reni, A., Hidayat, S., Bhawika, G. W., Ratnawati, E., & Nguyen, P. T. (2020). Maritime technology and the industrial revolution. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(1), 250–253. https://scholar.its.ac.id/en/publications/maritime-technology-and-the-industrial-revolution

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.

Salamzadeh, A., & Kesim, H. K. (2015). Startup companies: Life cycle and challenges. 4th International Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship (EEE), 1–11. https://tarjomefa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/5929-English-TarjomeFa.pdf

Sarwoko, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of creative self-efficacy. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 23(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v23i2.2282

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Gonzales-Roma, V. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Setyowati, D. (2022, May 30). Lebih dari 15 ribu karyawan startup di-PHK bulan ini. Katadata.co.id. https://katadata.co.id/digital/startup/62945fd0304cd/lebih-dari-15-ribu-karyawan-startup-di-phk-bulan-ini

Supranto, J., & Limakrisna, N. (2019). Petunjuk praktis penelitian ilmiah untuk menyusun skripsi, tesis dan disertasi (5th ed.). Mitra Wacana Media.

Suwarno, D. J., & Silvianita, A. (2017). Knowledge sharing dan inovasi pada industri startup (Studi pada 15 perusahaan startup di Program Indigo Incubator, Bandung Digital Valley). Ecodemica, 1(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.31294/jeco.v1i1.1530

Xu, G. Y., & Wang, Z. S. (2008). The impact of transformational leadership style on organizational performance: The intermediary effects of leader-member exchange. 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings, ICMSE, 1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2008.4669047

Yosua, I., & Panggabean, H. (2021). Factors affecting the affective identity-motivation to lead (AI-MTL) of lecturers: case Study in X University. Jurnal Psikologi, 20(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.20.1.62-74

Yu, C. (2017). The relationship between undergraduate students’ creative ability, career self-management and employ ability. Advances in Social Sciences, 6(7), 964–969. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2017.67138

Zhang, G., & Wang, Y. (2022). Organizational identification and employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of work engagement and the moderating role of creative self-efficacy. Chinese Management Studies, 16(5), 1108–1123. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2021-0294

Zhang, P., & Gheibi, S. (2015). From intrinsic motivation to employee creativity: The role of knowledge integration and team psychological safety. European Scientific Journal, 11(11), 1857–7881. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5527

Zhang, Y., Long, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Pay for performance and employee creativity: The importance of procedural justice and willingness to take risks. Management Decision, 53(7), 1378–1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2013-0596