DIVERSIFIKASI INTERNASIONAL DAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI INDONESIA DENGAN EFISIENSI SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

Main Article Content

Riska Agustin
Rahmat Setiawan

Abstract

Kinerja perusahaan tercermin dari meningkatnya nilai perusahaan karena perusahaan mampu mengelola sumber daya yang dimiliki. Hal ini membutuhkan keahlian, pengetahuan dan keefisiensian manajemen dalam mengelola sumber daya serta mengembangkan strategi yang tepat. Diversifikasi internasional merupakan strategi yang diterapkan perusahaan di era globalisasi ini untuk mengembangkan pangsa pasar internasional yang dapat meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan. Mengingat fakta bahwa sumber daya langka, kebutuhan untuk menjadi efisien merupakan fenomena penting dalam usaha peningkatan kinerja perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh efisiensi terhadap hubungan antara diversifikasi internasional terhadap kinerja perusahaan manufaktur. Dengan metode purposive sampling dan periode penelitian antara 2013-2017, kami mendapatkan data 69 perusahaan manufaktur dengan jumlah observasi sebanyak 223. Terdapat dua langkah teknik analisis yang digunakan yaitu dengan metode Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) dan analisis regresi linier berganda. Kami menemukan bahwa diversifikasi internasional mempunyai pengaruh positif yang signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia. Efisiensi memoderasi pengaruh positif diversifikasi internasional terhadap kinerja perusahaan. 

 

The firm's performance is reflected in the increasing value of the company because the company is able to manage its resources. This requires management expertise, knowledge and management efficiency in managing resources and developing appropriate strategies. International diversification is a strategy implemented by companies in this era of globalization to develop international market share that can improve firm’s performance. Given the fact that resources are scarce, the need to be efficient is an important phenomenon in an effort to improve firm performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of efficiency on the relationship between international diversification on the performance of manufacturing firms. Using the purposive sampling method and the research period between 2013-2017, we obtained data from 69 manufacturing firms with a total of 223 observations. There are two steps of the analytical technique used, namely the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and multiple linear regression method. We find that international diversification has a significant positive effect on the performance of manufacturing firms in Indonesia. Efficiency moderates the positive effect of international diversification on a firm's performance.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Riska Agustin, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

dosen fakultas ekonomi dan bisnis islam

Rahmat Setiawan, universitas Airlannga

kaprodi magister manajemen

References

Altaf, N., & Shah, F. A. (2015). Internationalization and firm performance of Indian firms: Does product diversity matter? Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.05.002

Aw, B. Y., & Hwang, A. R. (1995). Productivity and the export market: A firm-level analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 47(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)00062-H

Baik, B., Chae, J., Choi, S., & Farber, D. B. (2013). Changes in operational efficiency and firm performance: A frontier analysis approach. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(3), 996–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01179.x

Benito-Osorio, D., Colino, A., Guerras-Martín, L. Á., & Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á. (2016). The international diversification-performance link in Spain: Does firm size really matter? International Business Review, 25(2), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.09.004

Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160104

Calabrese, G. G., & Manello, A. (2018). Firm internationalization and performance: Evidence for designing policies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(6), 1221–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.01.008

Charles, V., & Cornillier, F. (2017). Value of the stochastic efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 81, 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.061

Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120104

Chen, C. J., & Yu, C. M. J. (2012). Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. International Business Review, 21(3), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.06.002

Coelli, T. . (1996). A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1 : Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program.pdf. CEPA Working Paper No.8. Department of Econometrics.

Delbufalo, E., Poggesi, S., & Borra, S. (2016). Diversification, family involvement and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Journal of Management Development, 35(5), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0129

Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (1999). Global Diversification, Industrial Diversification, and Firm Value.

Doaei, M., & Shavazipour, B. (2013). Corporate diversification’s effects on Efficiency and productivity: case study of Manufacturing firms listed in Bursa Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 5(August), 77–96.

Fazlollahi, A., & Franke, U. (2018). Measuring the impact of enterprise integration on firm performance using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.011

Gao, W., & Chou, J. (2015). Innovation efficiency, global diversification, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.009

Garrido-Prada, P., Delgado-Rodriguez, M. J., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2019). Effect of product and geographic diversification on company performance: Evidence during an economic crisis. European Management Journal, 37(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.06.004

Greene, W. H., & Segal, D. (2004). Profitability and efficiency in the U.S. life insurance industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022092.70204.fa

Gyan, A. K., Brahmana, R., & Bakri, A. K. (2017). Diversification strategy, efficiency, and firm performance: Insight from emerging market. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.045

Hsu, W. T., Chen, H. L., & Cheng, C. Y. (2013). Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: The moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.001

Jafarinejad, M., Ngo, T., & Escobari, D. (2018). Disentangling the impacts of industrial and global diversification on firm risk. Global Finance Journal, 37(2017), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.04.006

Madura, J. (2015). International Financial Management.pdf (12th Editi). Cengage learning.

Mukhopadhyay, J., & Chakraborty, I. (2017). Foreign institutional investment, business groups and firm performance: Evidence from India. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.09.015

Qian, G., Khoury, T. A., Peng, M. W., & Qian, Z. (2010). THE PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS OF INTRA- AND INTER-REGIONAL GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSIFICATION. Business, 31(9)(March), 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj

Surjadi, L. (2019). Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v3i2.5969

Symeou, P., & Kretschmer, T. (2012). Diversification and firm performance in dynamic environments : the role of the firm ? s dynamic capabilities and absorptive capacity . Diversification and firm performance in dynamic environments : the. Druid 2012, 0–26.

http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/q35k9nvmh1aeqv0xspxrpd0ymu5d.pdf

Vithessonthi, C., & Racela, O. C. (2016). Short- and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2015.12.001

Wagner, H. (2004). Internationalization speed and cost efficiency: Evidence from Germany. International Business Review, 13(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.05.001

Xiao, S. S., Jeong, I., Moon, J. J., Chung, C. C., & Chung, J. (2013). Internationalization and Performance of Firms in China: Moderating Effects of Governance Structure and the Degree of Centralized Control. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.12.003

Yang, Y., Cao, Y., & Yang, L. T. (Grace). (2017). Product diversification and property performance in the urban lodging market: The relationship and its moderators. Tourism Management, 59, 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.08.018

Zhu, Q., Wu, J., & Song, M. (2018). Efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis in the big data context. Computers and Operations Research, 98, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.017