Perbandingan Sifat Kepribadian Berdasarkan Pendekatan Ocean Antara Wirausaha Sosial Pria Dan Wanita
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main purpose of this research is to discover the comparison of OCEAN approach’s personality traits between male and female social-entrepreneur. Selected sample in this research has been chosen by purpose sampling, which involved 60 social-entrepreneurs in Jakarta; therefore, 30 male social-entrepreneurs and 30 female social-entrepreneurs in Jakarta has been selected to be involved in this research. All data in this research are collected using quantitative research method, specifically using questionnaires. Furthermore, Likert’s scale and independent sample t-test has been used to analyze all data gathered in this research, and Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23 program was used in the analysis process. The results of this research show that female social-entrepreneurs are tending to have the OCEAN approach’s personality traits, which consists of openness to experience, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, and conscientiousness, rather than male social-entrepreneurs.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan sifat kepribadian berdasarkan pendekatan OCEAN antara wirausaha sosial pria dan wanita. Sampel dipilih dengan menggunakan purpose sampling. Populasi penelitian ini adalah wirausaha sosial di Jakarta dengan jumlah sampel 60 wirausaha sosial di Jakarta, yang terdiri dari 30 wirausaha sosial pria dan 30 wirausaha sosial wanita. Data diukur dengan menggunakan skala Likert dan menggunakan analisis data independent sample t-test, dengan dibantu oleh program Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) versi 23. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa wirausaha sosial wanita lebih memiliki sifat kepribadian OCEAN (openness to experience, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism dan conscientiousness) daripada wirausaha sosial pria.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.,/p>
References
Berry, C. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates:
A review and meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410-424.
Chell,E. (2008). The Entrepreneurial Personality: A Social Construction. NewYork: Routledge.
Christobal, E., Flavian, C, and Guinaliu, M. (2007). Perceived eservice quality: Measurement
validity and effect on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty. Managing Service Quality,
(2), 317-340.
Costa, P.T., Jr, Terracciano, A. and McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits
a cross cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Perspectives. Sociology.
Psychology, 81. 322-331.
DeYoung, C.G., Quilty, L. C. and Peterson,J.B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects
of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 93 (5), 880-896.
Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of
Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Fisher, J. L., and Koch, J. V. (2008). Born, Not Made: The Entrepreneurial Personality. Westport:
Praeger Publisher.
Friedman, H.S., and Schustack, M.W. (2006). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research
rd Edition. London: Ally dan Bacon.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure.
Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
Gully, S. and Chen, G. (2010). Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training
outcomes. Learning, Training and Development in Organizations, 3-64.
John, O.P. and Srivastava, S. (2001). Big Five Trait Taxonomy. The Big-Five trait taxonomy:
History, measurement, and theoretical.102-138.
Johnson, B. (1990). Toward A Multidimensional Model of Entrepreneurship: The Case of
Achievement Motivation and The Entrepreneur. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice, 14(3),
–54
Judge, T. A., and Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797-807.
Larsen, R.J, and Buss, D.M. (2005). Personality Psyhology: Domains of Knowledge About Human
Nature, Second Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Malhotra, N. K. (2004). Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation, 4th Edition. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, 258.
McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality dalam L. Pervin &
O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd edition., 139-153).
New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., and John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and it’s
applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-216.
McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal.
American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
Nicholls, A., 2006. Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., and Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and
personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789-801.
Stewart, W.H., Watson, W.E., Carland, J.C. and Carland, J.W. (1998). A Proclivity for
Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Entrepreneurs, Small Business Owners, and Corporate
Managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(2): 189-214.
Sufren, dan Natanael, Y. (2014). Mahir Menggunakan SPSS Secara Otodidak. Jakarta: PT Elex
Media Komputindo.
Wanberg, C. R., and Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a
reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 132-142.