INTENSI PERILAKU SEBAGAI PREDIKTOR PERILAKU AFFORDABLE LOSS DENGAN MODERASI PERSEPSI KETIDAKPASTIAN PADA PEMILIK UKM DI JAKARTA

Main Article Content

Frangky Selamat
Tommy Setiawan Ruslim
Clarissa Linadi
Raymond Win Sarta

Abstract

Perilaku affordable loss memberikan gambaran bahwa memperhatikan kerugian dari investasi kewirausahaan daripada memprediksi keuntungan finansial di masa depan, adalah kondisi yang lebih dapat diandalkan karena informasi mengenai hal tersebut lebih mudah diperoleh. Intensi perilaku merupakan prediktor terbaik dari perilaku. Selama kondisi yang terjadi antara intensi perilaku dengan perilaku bersifat stabil dan tidak menimbulkan perubahan berarti, maka prediksi perilaku dengan menggunakan intensi, akan akurat. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada pemilik UKM di Jakarta untuk mengetahui perilaku affordable loss yang dipengaruhi oleh intensi perilaku dan dimoderasi oleh persepsi ketidakpastian. Prediksi keuntungan di masa depan lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh perubahan situasi yang sering kali memaksa wirausaha mengubah rencana. Salah satu variabel yang dapat mengubah intensi adalah persepsi terhadap ketidakpastian. Ketidakpastian yang dipersepsi oleh seorang individu dapat memengaruhi intensi yang selanjutnya dapat mengubah perilaku yang terjadi, berbeda dari intensi perilaku sebelumnya. Sampel sebanyak 200 pemilik UKM dipilih secara tidak acak dan sesuai dengan tujuan dalam penelitian ini. Dengan menggunakan analisis PLS dan bantuan software SmartPLS versi 4 diperoleh hasil bahwa intensi perilaku dapat digunakan untuk memprediksi perilaku affordable loss dari pelaku UKM, sementara persepsi ketidakpastian memberikan pengaruh yang lemah dalam hubungan antara intensi dengan perilaku affordable loss. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan masukan bagi regulator dalam pengembangan UKM ketika menghadapi lingkungan usaha yang dinamis dan berubah cepat.


 


Affordable loss behavior illustrates that paying attention to losses from entrepreneurial investments rather than predicting future financial profits is a more reliable condition because information about this is easier to obtain. Behavioral intention is the best predictor of behavior. This research was conducted on SME owners in Jakarta to determine affordable loss behavior influenced by behavioral intentions and moderated by perceptions of uncertainty. As long as the conditions between behavioral intentions and behavior are stable and do not cause significant changes, behavioral predictions using intentions will be accurate. Forecasts of future profits are more influenced by changes in circumstances, which often force entrepreneurs to change plans. One variable that can change intentions is the perception of uncertainty. The uncertainty an individual perceives can influence intentions, changing the behavior and making it different from previous behavioral intentions. A sample of 200 SME owners was selected non-randomly and by the objectives of this research. By using PLS analysis and the help of SmartPLS version 4 software, the results obtained show that behavioral intentions can be used to predict affordable loss behavior of SME owners. At the same time, perceived uncertainty weakens the relationship between intentions and affordable loss behavior. The results of this research can provide input for regulators in developing SMEs when facing a dynamic and rapidly changing business environment.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Adam, A.F., Fayolle, A. (2015). Bridging the entrepreneurial intentions-behaviour gap: the role of commitment and implementation intentions, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 36-54.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211, 1991.

Ajzen, I & Fishbein, M (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bougie, R., Sekaran, U. (2020). Research Method for Business, A Skill-Building Approach, Eight Edition, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chandler, G.N., DeTienne, D.R., McKelvie, A., Troy, V., Mumford, T.V., (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study, Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 375-390.

Chin, W.W. (1995). Partial least square is to LISREL as principal components analysis is to common factor analysis, Technology Studies, 2: 315-319.

Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S. (2006). Business Research Methods, 9th Edition, New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S.D., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R (2009). Affordable loss: behavioral economics aspects of the plunge decision, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 105-126, published online in Wiley InterScience, DOI: 10.1002/sej.66

Duncan, R.B. (1972). The characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 313-327.

Gerba, D. (2012). Impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial ontentions of business and engineering students in Ethiopia, African Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 3, 258-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/20400701211265036

Gelaidan, H.M., Abdullatief, A.O. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students in Malaysia, the role of self-confidence, educational and relation support, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2017, pp 54-67.

Gueguen, D.S., Fayolle, A. (2019). Crossing the entrepreneurial Rubicon: a longitudinal investigation, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 1044-1065.

Hair, J.F.J., Lack, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2008). Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edition, New York: Pearson Prentice Hall

Haneberg, D.H. (2020). SME’s manager learning from crisis, and effectual behavior, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development © Emerald Publishing Limited 1462-6004 DOI 10.1108/JSBED-01-2021-0009.

He, L-H., Li, Teng. (2023). How entrepreneurial implementation intentions moves toward subsequent actions: affordable loss and environmental uncertainty, Emerald Publishing Limited, Chinese Management Studies, DOI 10.1108/CMS-08-2022-0307

Jogiyanto H.M. (2011). Konsep dan Aplikasi Structural Equation Modeling Berbasis Varian dalam Penelitian Bisnis, Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Malhotra, N.K., (2020). Marketing Research, An Applied Orientation, Seventh Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Martina, R.A. (2019). Toward a theory of affordable loss, Small Business Economics, An Entrepreneurship Journal.

Sanchez, G (2013). PLS Path Modelling with R, Trowchez Editions, Berkeley.

Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theorethical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency, Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 243-263.

Sarasvathy, S.D., & Dew, N (2003). “Effectual networks: a pre-commitment approach to bridging the gap between opportunism & trust”, Presented at: Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Seattle.

Sarasvathy, S. and Dew, N. (2005). Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 385-406.

Selamat, F (2023). The role of subjective norms to predict experimental behavior through intention of sme owner in Jakarta, International Journal of Application on Economics and Business (IJAEB), Volume 1, Issue 3, 2023. ISSN: 2987-1972.

Selamat, F., Maupa, H., Taba, M.I. (2023). The role of intention in the relationship between perceived behavioral control and affordable loss behavior of sme owners in Jakarta, Indonesia, International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Volume 2 Issue 3 August 2023 / Pg. No: 348-352

Doi: 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V2I3P146

Tiviti, F (2021). UKM dan Upaya Membangun Ketahanan Demi Digitalisasi, diakses pada 26 Februari 2024, cnbcindonesia.com,https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/opini/20210809130256-14-267201/umkm-dan-upaya-membangun-ketahanan-demi-digitalisasi

Thorgren, S, & Williams, T.A. (2020). Staying alive during an unfolding crisis: how SMEs ward off impending disaster, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Vol. 14, pp. 1-11

Zhang, S.X., & Cueto, J. (2017). The study of bias in entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 419-454.