KEDUDUKAN HARTA BAWAAN DALAM PERKAWINAN YANG DISITAAKIBAT TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1948K/PDT/2015
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Confiscation of innate property in a marriage that occurs as result of criminal act of
corruption committed by the husband, where the object confiscated is in the form of land obtained
not from the proceeds of a criminal act of corruption but from the gift of the wife's parents before
the marriage. The research with the title "The Position of Congenital Assets Confiscated Due to
the Crime of Corruption is listed in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1948K/Pdt/2015"core
problems, namely how the judge's consideration in determining the confiscation assets in marriage
as a result of criminal acts of corruption, and how the position of innate property in a marriage
related to the confiscation of a criminal act of corruption. The purpose of this study was to
determine the position of the innate assets confiscated by the state when there was a criminal
confiscation of corruption related to the corruption case that ensnared the husband, on the object
of land where the land was obtained from a parental grant from the wife long before the husband's
corruption and to find out how the judge's considerations in determine the confiscation of
collateral in the husband's corruption crime. Based on the results of the research, it shows that
there are legal irregularities where it is stated that the opponent has no interest in this case, where
in fact the opponent has an interest as the injured party. is not the result of a criminal act of
corruption by the husband of the opponent.
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku
Purwaning Yanuar, Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi: Berdasarkan
Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi 2003 Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia
(Bandung: Alumni, 2007)
Lilik Mulyadi, Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Normatif, Teorits, Praktik, dan
Masalahnya), (Bandung: PT Alumni, 2007)
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Cet ke-3, (Jakarta:UI
Press, 2008)
Soekanto, Soerjono. dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif,
Cetakan ke-8, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004)
Marpaung Leden. Tindak Pidana Korupsi Masalah dan Pemecahannya,
(Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002), hal. 149.
Tihami & Sobari Sahrani, Fikih Munakahat Kajian Fikih Lengkap, Ct. 3
(Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2013)
Idris Ramulyo,Mohammad Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Kewarisan,
Hukum Peradilan Agama dan Zakat Menurut Hukum Islam,
(Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2000)
B. Artikel Jurnal Online
Agus Sugiono, Otto Yudianto, Erny Herlin Seryorini. Pengembalian
Harta Terpidana Koruptor Setelah Putusan Pengadilan Berkekuatan
Hukum Tetap, Jurnal Universitas 17 Agustus. Vol 22, No 1 Tahun
, diakes 28 Maret 2022 doi: 10.1111/ablj.12041
M. Syamsa Ardisasmita. Artikel Definisi Korupsi Menurut Prespektif
Hukum Dan E-nnouncement Untuk Tata Kelola Pemerintahan
Yang Lebih Terbuka, Transparan Dan Akuntabel. Jakarta. 2008,
diakses 28 Maret 2022 doi: 10.1111/ablj.12041
David Adrian. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Objek Hak
Tanggungan Dari Upaya Sita Jaminan Oleh Pihak Ketiga, Lex
Privatum, Vol.II/No. 1/Jan-Mar/2014, diakses 25 May 2022, doi:
1111/ablj.12041
Ambrosius Adjie, Peletakan Sita Jaminan Atas Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.
Jurnal Universitas Parahyangan. Vol.1, No.2 Tahun 2015, diakes
May 2022, doi: 10.1111/ablj.12041
C. Kutipan Koran/Majalah
Tamtomo, Akbar Bhayu. "INFOGRAFIK: 7 Kasus Korupsi dengan
Kerugian Terbesar di Indonesia."(Kompas, Jakarta,2020) URL:
https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/01/18/090500465/infogra
fik-7-kasus-korupsi- dengan- kerugian-terbesar-di-indonesia,
diakses pada tanggal 26 Maret 2022