KEBEBASAN AKADEMIK DAN OTONOMI KEILMUAN DALAM SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN DEMOKRASI PANCASILA (Studi Kasus Webinar Constitutional Law Society Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Academic freedom and scientific autonomy are rights held by students and professors, but
academic freedom and scientific autonomy often experience problems such as those in the
webinar Case Study, "Academic Freedom and Scientific Autonomy in the Pancasila
Democratic Government System (the Constitutional Law Sociétional webinar Case Study."The
Faculty of Law of Gadjah Mada University Yogyakarta)". Is the webinar on "The Problem of
Presidential Dismissal in the midst of Pandemic Review of the State System" at Gadjah Mada
University Yogyakarta justified to be held in Indonesia that practices the Pancasila
democratic government system? Research results showed that the "Problem of Presidential
Dismissal in the midst of Pandemic Review of the State System" at Gadjah Mada University
Yogyakarta was legally justified to be held in Indonesia which practiced Pancasila's
democratic government system, as it did not conflict with Article 28 of 1945 and regulations.
legislation on academic freedom and scientific autonomy. The actions of some unknown
individuals who terrorized the webinar organizers were against the law, contrary to
Pancasila's democracy and violated human rights to free speech, opinion, and gatherings and
to violate the academic freedom and autonomy of science stipulated in the 1945 Constitution
and the laws of law.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka,
Makdisi, George. Freedom in Islamic Jurisprudence; Ijtihad, Taqlid and
Academic Freedom dalam Religion, Law, and Learning in
Classical Islam. Hampshire: Variorum, 1990.
Hufron. Pemberhentian Presiden di Indonesia antara Teori dan Praktik.
Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo, 2012.
Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat. Kebebasan Berekspresi di
Internet. Jakarta: Elsam, 2013.
Muladi, Demokratisasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Reformasi Hukum di
Indonesia. Jakarta: The Habibie Center, 2002.
Riant D, Nugroho. Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi, Implementasi dan
Evaluasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2003.
Iskandar, Pranoto. Hukum HAM Internasional Sebuah Pengantar
Kontekstual. Cianjur: IMR Press, 2010
Raharjo, Satjipto. Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta:
Kompas, 2003.
B. Kutipan Paper/Orasi Ilmiah
Downs, Donald A, “Academic Freedom: What It Is, What It Isn't, and How
to Tell the Difference”, John W. Pope Center for Higher
Education: 4, Mei 2009, hal. 8.
Press Release Dekan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada: Diskusi
Mahasiswa Constitutional Law Society, 29 Mei 2020.
Soenmi, Lovina, “Diberangus di Kampus”, Makalah, disampaikan pada
Seminar tentang Kebebasan Akademik, (Jakarta: Lokataru
Foundation, 2019), hal. 3.
C. Jurnal
Moedjiono, “Cendekiawan dan Kebebasan Akademik”, Jurnal Pendidikan
Islam Jurusan Tarbiyah.Volume V, 1999.
Nasution Adnan Buyung, “Kendala dan Peluang Implementasi Pasal 27
dan Pasal 28 UUD 1945 di Era Mendatang”, disampaikan pada
seminar CESDA-LP3ES bekerjasama dengan The Asia
Foundation, (Jakarta: Juli 1993), dan pernah dimuat dalam Jurnal
Pembangunan dan Hukum, No. 5 Tahun XXIII, Oktober 1993.
Natangsa Surbakti, “Kebebasan Akademik dan Otonomi Keilmuan Hukum
di Indonesia”, Jurisprudence, Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2004.
D. Website
Jawa Pos, “UII-UGM Kecam Teror Terhadap Panitia Diskusi
Pemakzulan Presiden”,
https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/30/05/2020/uii-ugm-kecam-te
ror-terhadap-panitia-diskusi-pemberhentian-presiden/, diakses 7
Mei 2022, pukul 19.36. Wib.
Voice of America Indonesia, “Berujung Ancaman Pembunuhan,
Pemerintah Sayangkan Diskusi Soal Pemakzulan Gagal”,
https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/berujung-ancaman-pembunuhan
-pemerintah-sayangkan-diskusi-soal-pemakzulan-gagal/5442869.
html, diakses 7 Mei 2022, pukul 19.28 Wib.