ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP UNSUR-UNSUR NOODWEER DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BANDUNG NOMOR 162/PID.B/2021/PN.BDG

Main Article Content

Monika Romauli Manurung
R. Rahaditya

Abstract

The idea of noodweer is that the act is executed on the idea of the usage of the proper and
right pressure in order that there's no other dif erent choice, which may be used apart
from committing an act that violates the regulation. The act ought to meet important
points, namely: there became a right away assault wherein at once threatened and in
opposition to the regulation. The assault intentionally geared toward the body, politeness
and possessions belongs to himself or others. So far, withinside the case of crook acts of
persecution in particular, the utility of the precept of pressured protection is regularly
now no longer according with the concept in essence. In addition, the pressured
protection is likewise substantially stimulated with the aid of using the continued
production of the case, how the proof is presented, and the way they of ers felony
considerations withinside the absence of maximal proof, it's miles clean that the choose
additionally did now no longer behavior a seek associated with the that means of the
essence of a pressured protection. The technique in this case is descriptive. This studies
became performed thru regulation normative approach, with the aid of using analyzing
the legal guidelines and all informations that is associated with this example.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara

Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik

Indonesia, 2008.

B. Buku

Hamdan, M. Alasan Penghapus Pidana (Teori dan Studi Kasus). Bandung: PT.

Refika Aditama, 2013.

Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,

Ishaq, H. Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi.

Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2017.

Kamil, Ahmad dan M. Fauzan. Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Yurisprudensi. Jakarta:

Kencana, 2008.

Lamintang, P.A.F. dan Franciscus Theojunior Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum

Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Ke-11. Jakarta: Prenada

Media, 2011.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Cetakan ke-12. Jakarta:

Prenada Media, 2016.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Cetakan ke-13. Jakarta:

Prenada Media, 2017.

Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Sudarto. Suatu Dilema Dalam Pembaharuan Sistim Pidana Indonesia. Semarang:

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1976.

Qamar, Nurul dan Farah Syah Rezah. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan

Non-Doktrinal. Makassar: CV Social Politic Genius, 2020.

Zulfa, Eva Achjani. Gugurnya Hak Menuntut Dasar Penghapus, Peringan, dan

Pemberat Pidana. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010.

C. Website

Aulina, Laurences. “Pembunuhan Karena Pembelaan Diri”.

https://www.kennywiston.com/pembunuhan-karena-pembelaan-diri.

Diakses pada tanggal 19 Oktober 2021.