KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI PEMULIHAN NAMA BAIK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN DAN/ATAU PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM PENAGIHAN PIUTANG OLEH DESK COLLECTOR FINTECH P2P LENDING ILEGAL DI INDONESIA

Main Article Content

Eliza Della Kanaya
Ade Adhari

Abstract

Started from the big amount of complaints related to criminal acts of defamation by Fintech P2P Lending illegal in Indonesia at this time, and realizing that there are obstacles in restoring the good name of victims in the legal system in Indonesia, it is felt that there is a need for legal reform that emphasizes victim recovery. This study examines about the formulation of the good name recovery policy for victims of criminal acts of defamation, especially victims of criminal acts of defamation by illegal Fintech P2P Lending. The type of research used is normative prescriptive which is carried out with a statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. This research resulted a new concept that can be adapted and applied in Indonesia, namely the form of satisfaction as an alternative in restoring the victim's good name, so that the victim can obtain restitution on his behalf only through the application mechanism, and does not need to file a civil lawsuit. Thus, the victim can get a recovery of his name and restore his social life in society as soon as possible

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. Buku

Amuntarja, Bima Ali. Tuntutan Ganti Rugi dan Rehabilitasi Nama Baik Atas

Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas

Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, 1996.

Bungin, Burhan. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo

Persada, 2008.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid

II. Jakarta: Sarana Bakti Semesta, 1985.

Kurnia, Titon Slamet. Reparasi Terhadap Korban Pelanggaran HAM di

Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Adi Bakti, 2005.

Maskun. Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup,

Maskun. Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup,

Muhamad Agus Fajar, Fajar Ari Sudewo, Kus Rizkianto. Hukum Siber

(Perbandingan Indonesia dan Malaysia). Pekalongan: PT. Nasya

Expanding Management, 2021.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1990.

Sahetapy, JE. Viktimologi Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar

Harapan, 1987.

Sitompul, Asril. Hukum Internet. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan

Transaksi Elektronik,(Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik

Indonesia Nomor 5952).

Indonesia. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang

Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi,

(Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 324).

C. Artikel Jurnal Online

Marasabessy, Fauzy. “Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran

Mekanisme Baru”. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun ke-45 No.1

Tahun (2015): 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol45.no1.9.

Novridasati, Wening et al. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Desk Collector Fintech

Ilegal Serta Perlindungan Terhadap Korban”. Jurnal Litigasi (e-journal).

Vol. 21, Nomor 2 (2020): 248. Diakses tanggal 15 Agustus 2021.

http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v21i2.3103.

Schauer, F. “Social Foundations of The Law of Defamation: A Comparative

Analysis”, Journal of Media Law and Practice (1981): 1.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805978.

Sitepu, Anwar. “Fenomena Rentenir: Studi Eksploratori di Kabupaten Bekasi dan

Sekitarnya”. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial

Volume 10, No. 1 (2020): 1. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v10i1.2022.

Yulia, Rena. “Menggugat Pemenuhan Hak Korban Pelanggaran Hak Asasi

Manusia Masa Lalu”. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, Vol. 4 No.3 (2005): 271.

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/96198-ID-menggugatpemenuhan-hak-korban-pelanggar.pdf.

D. Website

Black’s Law Dictionary, “What is Defamation?”. Diakses 8 Desember 2021.

https://thelawdictionary.org/defamation/.

Fadila, Annisa Rizky. “YLKI Catat 3.692 Aduan Pada 2020, Produk Jasa

Keuangan Mendominasi”

https://katadata.co.id/happyfajrian/berita/5ff81b1b018cb/ylki-catat3692-aduan-pada-2020-produk-jasa-keuangan-mendominasi. Diakses

tanggal 13 Agustus 2021.

Maulida, Rani. “Fintech: Pengertian, Jenis, Hingga Regulasinya Di Indonesia”

https://www.online-pajak.com/tentang-pajak-pribadi/fintech. Diakses

tanggal 10 Agustus 2021.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). “FAQ: Ketentuan Umum”. Diakses tanggal 12

Desember 2021. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-danstatistik/direktori/fintech/Documents/FAQ%20Fintech%20Lending.pdf,

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Infografis OJK Bersama Kementerian atau Lembaga

Terkait Berkomitmen Berantas Pinjol Ilegal”

https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/infoterkini/Pages/Infografis-OJK-Bersama-Kementerian-atau-LembagaTerkait-Berkomitmen-Berantas-Pinjol-Ilegal.aspx. Diakses tanggal 23

Oktober 2021