PRAKTEK EKSEKUSI ASET PERUSAHAAN DEBITOR PAILIT MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 11/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2017/ PN.NIAGA.SMG)

Chairul Maksus Syam, Stanislaus Atalim

Abstract


Bankruptcy occurs not only for small capital companies, companies with big names or brands are not free from the risk of bankruptcy. Even the confiscation of the assets of a bankrupt company has experienced obstacles and the bankruptcy bill is not sufficient to cover the creditors' debt. The problems faced in writing this thesis are what the legal consequences are and what legal remedies for creditors if the bankruptcy bill is insufficient. The research method used in writing this thesis is normative legal research. The results show that the legal consequences and legal remedies for creditors if the bankruptcy bill is insufficient, of course the creditors have the right to receive their debt repayment from the debtor in accordance with the total bill and the payment method specified in the agreement. The management of the assets of the bankrupt debtor is transferred to a curator who is supervised by the supervisory judge, so that all actions affecting the bankruptcy assets, whether detrimental or profitable, must be carried out with the approval of the curator. Whereas legal remedies for creditors if the bankruptcy bill is insufficient, of course in this case refers to the decision to withdraw the bankruptcy statement, bankruptcy law through Article 19 paragraph (2) opens legal remedies for parties who are not satisfied with the decision by filing an appeal and / or Reconsideration to the Supreme Court.

Keywords


Execution Practices ; Company Assets ; Bankrupt Debtors.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Budiarto, Agus. Kedudukan Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Pendiri. (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2014).

Manik, Edward. Cara Mudah Proses Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012).

Rochmawanto, Munif. “Upaya Hukum dalam Kepailitan”. Jurnal Independen. Volume 3 Nomor 2, 2013.

Subhan, Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan (Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Pengadilan). (Jakarta: Putra Grafika, 2008).

Wignyosumarto, Parwoto. Peran dan Tugas Hakim Pengawas, Kepailitan dan Transfer Aset Secara Melawan Hukum, Prosiding. (Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, 2004).

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945.

Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443).

Indonesia. Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 11/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/ PN.Niaga.Smg.

Internet

Hasanah, Sovia. “Tanggung Jawab Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Jika Perusahaan Pailit”. www.hukumonline.com, diakses 12 Desember 2020.

Nurdin, Nazar. “Tak Mampu Bayar Utang, Pabrik Jamu Nyonya Meneer Dinyatakan Pailit“. www.ekonomi.kompas.com, diakses 18 November 2019.

Rizki, Mochamad Januar. “Sulitnya Eksekusi Aset dalam Perkara Kepailitan”, www.hukumonline.com, diakses 10 Agustus 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10584

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Hukum Adigama is indexed by:

   

 

-----

Alamat:

Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Tarumanagara

Ruang Jurnal, Gedung M, Lantai 2, Kampus 1

Jl. S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat - 11440

[T] (+6221) 5671748, 5604477

[E] era.hukum.mahasiswa@fh.untar.ac.id

----- 

E-ISSN 2655-7347

P-ISSN 2747-0873

-----

Web Analytics Jurnal Hukum Adigama Stats

Flag Counter