Pengaruh Latar Belakang Keluarga, Kepribadian, dan Efikasi Diri Terhadap Intensi Berwirausaha Mahasiswa

Main Article Content

Christine Natalita
Franky Selamat

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine whether: 1) family background can affect entrepreneurial intention; 2) personality can affect entrepreneurial intention; 3) self-efficacy can affect entrepreneurial intention. Sample was selected using nonprobability sampling technique with convenience sampling method amounted to 100 respondents of university students in Indonesia. Data were measured by Likert scale and analyzed with processing techniques using SmartPLS 3.0 program. The result of this study shows that, 1) family background support positively had affect on entrepreneurial intention; 2) personality support positively had affect on entrepreneurial intention; 3) self-efficacy support positively had affect on entrepreneurial intention. Several recommendations for research are presented based on conclusions and suggestions on the results of this study.



Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji apakah: 1) latar belakang keluarga dapat mempengaruhi intensi berwirausaha, 2) kepribadian dapat mempengaruhi intensi berwirausaha, 3) efikasi diri dapat mempengaruhi intensi berwirausaha. Sampel dipilih menggunakan Teknik nonprobability sampling dengan jumlah 100 responden mahasiswa di Indonesia. Data diukur dengan skala Likert dan dianalisi dengan Teknik proses yang menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.0. Secara keseluruhan, hasil penelitian ini meunjukkan bahwa, 1) latar belakang keluarga berpengaruh positif terhadap intensi berwirausaha, 2) kepribadian berpengaruh positif terhadap intensi berwirausaha, 3) efikasi diri berpengaruh positif terhadap intensi berwirausaha. Beberapa rekomendasi untuk penelitian disajikan berdasarkan kesimpulan dan saran mengenai hasil penelitian ini.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Christine Natalita, Program Studi S1 Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Tarumanagara

Program Studi S1 Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Tarumanagara

Franky Selamat, Universitas Tarumanagara

Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Tarumanagara

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human

Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”,

Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191.

BarNir, A., Watson, W.E. & Hutchins, H.M. (2011), “Mediation and Moderated Mediation

in The Relationship Among Role Models, Self-Efficacy, Entrepreneurial Career

Intention, and Gender”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 270-297

Cavana, Delahaye, R.Y., Brian L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business research:

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Queensland: John Wiley & Sons Inc, Milton.

Cohen, Jacob. (1988). Statiscal Power Analysist for the Behavioral Sciences (Ed. 2).

Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.

Covin, J.G. & Miller, D. (2014), “International Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptual

Considerations, Research Themes, Measurement Issues, and Future Research

Directions”,Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38 (1), 11-44.

Farrukh, M., Khan, A. A., Shahid Khan, M., Ravan Ramzani, S., & Soladoye, B. S. A.

(2017). Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Role of Family Factors, Personality Traits and Self-Efficacy. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management And Sustainable

Development, 13(4), 303-317.

Garaika, & Margahana, H. (2019). Self Efficacy, Self Personality and Self Confidence on

Entrepreneurial Intention: Study on Young Enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship

Education, 2(1).

Gelaidan, H.M., Abdullateef, A.O. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students

in Malaysia: The role of self-confidence, educational and relation support. Journal of

Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 54-67.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The

Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.

Henderson, R., & Robertson, M. (2000). Who wants to be an entrepreneur? Young adult

attitudes to entrepreneurship as a career”. Career Development International, 5(6),

-287.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least square path

modeling in International Marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-

Kusmintarti, A., Asdani, A., & Riwajanti, N.I. (2017). The relationship between creativity,

entrepreneurial attitude and entrepreneurial intention (case study on the students of

State Polytechnic Malang). Int. J. Trade and Global Markets, 10(1), 28–36.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business (6th ed.). Italy: Printer

Trento Srl.

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling

for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration.

MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.

Yurtkoru, S. Ku?cu, Z.K., & Do?anay, A. (2014). Exploring the Antecedents of

Entrepreneurial Intention on Turkish University Students. Procedia- Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 150, 841-850.