OPTIMASI PARAMETER 3D PRINTING TERHADAP WAKTU DAN WARPING DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE TAGUCHI

Main Article Content

Mase Hideaki
Agus Halim
Erwin Siahaan

Abstract

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is one of the most popular 3D printing technology that used at academic and business purposes due to the easiness of the manufacture process that it held. But, one of the most major problems that usually occur in the industry is the frequentness of damaged and deficiency on the result of printing, especially when it is printed using the ABS filament. Although, ABS is one of the filaments which has a lower cost compared to others, but has a bigger value per gram on the printing sectors compared to PLA filaments. It could be a good business prospect if it can be handled on the problems. Therefore, the knowledge on how to prevent the problems, and finding an efficiency on the various of infill pattern, would be one of the key of success in this industry. In this article, a research on finding optimum parameters against the time and quality of the product using the Taguchi method, and also ASTM D-638 is also needed to find the best infill pattern against the tensile strength that an ABS filament have on the mechanical properties. As a result, the parameters, nozzle temperature and bed temperature have a small impact on producing time, but have a greater impact on the quality of printing product. Besides, the infill pattern which has the biggest tensile strength on smaller density is Trihexagon. Meanwhile, the Lines infill has the biggest standard of deviation, which endure the most stress on the bigger density compared to Triangles and Trihexagon.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Agus Halim, Universitas Tarumanagara

 

 

Erwin Siahaan

 

 

References

“The best 3D printed consumer products - 3D Printing Industry.” https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/the-best-3d-printed-consumer-products-148352/ (accessed Sep. 22, 2021).

“FDM vs. SLA: Compare the Two Most Popular Types of 3D Printers.” https://formlabs.com/asia/blog/fdm-vs-sla-compare-types-of-3d-printers/ (accessed Sep. 22, 2021).

“Reasons Why 3D Printing is Reaching Mainstream | Smithers.” https://www.smithers.com/resources/2017/jul/reasons-why-3d-printing-is-reaching-themainstream (accessed Sep. 22, 2021).

“PLA vs. ABS: What’s the difference? | Hubs.” https://www.hubs.com/knowledge-base/pla-vsabs-whats-difference/ (accessed Sep. 22, 2021).

C. Abeykoon, P. Sri-Amphorn, and A. Fernando, “Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures,” Int. J. Light. Mater. Manuf., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 284–297, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003.

A. M. Titu, A. V. Sandu, A. B. Pop, S. Titu, and T. C. Ciungu, “The Taguchi Method Application to Improve the Quality of a Sustainable Process,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 374, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/374/1/012054.

P. Sivaiah and D. Chakradhar, “Modeling and optimization of sustainable manufacturing process

in machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 134, pp. 142–152, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.067.

M. A. Nazan, F. R. Ramli, M. R. Alkahari, M. N. Sudin, and M. A. Abdullaah, “Process parameter optimization of 3D printer using Response Surface Method,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2291–2296, 2017.

V. Madhav and S. Yeole, “Relative Studies on ASTM D638 Type–IV Specimens 3D,” 6th Int. 27th All India Manuf. Technol. Des. Res. Conf., no. September 2018, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327703890_Relative_Studies_on_ASTM_D638_Type-V_Specimens_3D_Printed_using_ABS_Material.

S. Anand Kumar and Y. Shivraj Narayan, Tensile testing and evaluation of 3D-printed PLA specimens as per ASTM D638 type IV standard, no. February 2018. Springer Singapore, 2019.

Q. Ma, M. R. M. Rejab, A. P. Kumar, H. Fu, N. M. Kumar, and J. Tang, “Effect of infill pattern, density and material type of 3D printed cubic structure under quasi-static loading,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 235, no. 19, pp. 4254–4272, 2021, doi:

1177/0954406220971667.