Penerimaan Teknologi Konferensi Video dan Motivasi Belajar
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic that has hit all corners of the world including Indonesia is a phenomenon that has a major impact on all sectors of people's lives, including the education sector. Therefore, educational institutions immediately resolve this problem by implementing online lectures as a substitute for face-to-face lectures. However, student acceptance of video conferencing technology did not fully motivate students to undergo online classes. The purpose of this study was to describe student acceptance of video conferencing technology in distance learning during pandemic. Through the digital ethnography method, researchers will explore and obtain reflections on the experiences of students who use digital technology to carry out the learning process online through video conferencing technology. Data collection was carried out through interviews with four informants from four different departments and literature studies. Data analysis of student communication technology acceptance was carried out using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) which was adapted from Mayring's (2010) research. The results of the analysis of the interview data with four informants show that the acceptance of student technology is not the only factor that affects student motivation in running online lectures. Factors that also influence student motivation to run online courses include the demands of lectures, assignments given, and the learning system used when running online classes. Student motivation in running online lectures needs to be considered because it plays a role in their understanding of the material being studied.
Pandemi Covid-19 yang melanda seluruh penjuru dunia termasuk Indonesia merupakan fenomena yang memiliki dampak besar pada seluruh sektor kehidupan masyarakat, tak terkecuali sektor pendidikan. Oleh sebab itu, instansi pendidikan dengan segera menuntaskan permasalahan ini dengan menerapkan kuliah online sebagai pengganti kuliah tatap muka. Namun, penerimaan mahasiswa terhadap teknologi konferensi video ternyata tidak sepenuhnya memotivasi mahasiswa dalam menjalani kelas online. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan penerimaan mahasiswa terhadap teknologi konferensi video dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh di masa pandemi. Melalui metode etnografi digital, peneliti akan menggali hingga memperoleh refleksi dari pengalaman mahasiswa yang memanfaatkan teknologi digital untuk melakukan proses pembelajaran secara online melalui teknologi konferensi video. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara terhadap empat informan dari empat jurusan berbeda dan studi literatur. Analisis data penerimaan teknologi komunikasi mahasiswa dilakukan menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang diadaptasi dari penelitian Mayring (2010). Hasil analisis dari data wawancara terhadap empat informan menunjukkan bahwa penerimaan teknologi mahasiswa tidak menjadi satu-satunya faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi mahasiswa dalam menjalankan kuliah online. Faktor-faktor yang turut mempengaruhi motivasi mahasiswa menjalankan kuliah online di antaranya adalah tuntutan perkuliahan, tugas yang diberikan, serta sistem belajar yang digunakan saat menjalankan kelas online. Motivasi mahasiswa dalam menjalankan kuliah online perlu diperhatikan karena berperan dalam pemahamannya mengenai materi yang dipelajari.
Article Details
References
Andrew, R., & Setyanto, Y. (n.d.). Implikasi Laboratorium dan Keaktifan di Kelas terhadap Ujian Akhir Semester Mahasiswa Jurusan Manajemen Bisnis. 99–106.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122
Conlon, M., & Pavlika, V. (2009). A discussion of video capturing to assist in distance learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5621 LNCS, 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_47
Creswell, J. W. R. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (fourth edi). sage.
Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
Evans, D. J. R., Bay, B. H., Wilson, T. D., Smith, C. F., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2020). Going Virtual to Support Anatomy Education: A STOP GAP in the Midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Anatomical Sciences Education, 0–2.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1963
Franchi, T. (2020). The Impact of the Covid?19 Pandemic on Current Anatomy Education and Future Careers: A Student’s Perspective. Anatomical Sciences Education, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1966
Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2012). A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188–235. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1979.1094525
Hwang, I-Hui Chang, Chi-Cheng Wang, Hsin-Ling Tsai, Shang-Jiun Chen, T.-Y. (2011). Mediating Effects of Computer Self-efficacy between Learning Motivation and Learning Achievement. Education Management, Education Theory and Education
Application, 53(9), 67–74.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Jandri, P. (2020). Safeguard research in the time of COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 26(4), 443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0852-1
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Vaishya, R., Bahl, S., & Suman, R. (2020). Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome : Clinical Research & Reviews Industry 4 . 0 technologies and their applications in fi ghting COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(4), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.032
Kerres, M. (2020). Against All Odds : Education in Germany Coping with Covid-19.
Liu, F., & Koenig, H. (2005). A secure P2P video conference system for enterprise environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3779 LNCS, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/11577188_13
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. In PPmP Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie (12th ed., Vol. 70, Issues 9–10). Beltz.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 00(00), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
Nehls, K., Smith, B. D., & Schneider, H. A. (2014). Video-conferencing interviews in qualitative research. Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology, January, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6493-7.ch006
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.1
Palvia, P., Mao, E., Salam, A. F., & Soliman, K. S. (2003). Management Information Systems Research: What’s There in a Methodology? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11(March). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01116
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice (Jai Seaman). sage.
Ridwan, H., Masrul, M., & Juhaepa, J. (2018). Komunikasi Digital Pada Perubahan Budaya Masyarakat E-Commerce Dalam Pendekatan Jean Baudrillard. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 1(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.24329/jurkom.v1i1.17
Roman, T. A., Callison, M., Myers, R. D., Berry, A. H., Roman, T. A., Callison, M., & Berry, A. H. (2020). Facilitating Authentic Learning Experiences in Distance Education : Embedding Research-Based Practices into an Online Peer Feedback Tool. i.
Setiawan, Y., Zulkarnain, Z., & Nurjanah, N. (2020). Pengaruh Komunikasi Berbasis Komputer Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Perpustakaan Dan Kepuasan Pemustaka. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24329/jurkom.v3i1.88
Vogelsang, K., Steinhüser, M., & Hoppe, U. (2013a). A qualitative approach to examine technology acceptance. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design, 1(November 2016), 234–245.
Vogelsang, K., Steinhüser, M., & Hoppe, U. (2013b). A qualitative approach to examine technology acceptance. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design, 1, 234–245.
Wu, P. F. (2012). A mixed methods approach to technology acceptance research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(3), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00287
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and After Covid-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3