ALTERNATIF PEMBIAYAAN INFRASTRUKTUR PERKOTAAN: KAJIAN TERHADAP MEKANISME DEVELOPER`S CONTRIBUTION DI DKI JAKARTA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Innovation in urban financing in DKI Jakarta needs to be continuously improved, considering that conventional financial sources, such as local and national government budget (APBD and APBN), are limited vis a vis the increasing demand. Mechanisms such as Public-Private Partnership (PPP or KPBU) which are currently being put forward, although they address the issue of efficiency, have not yet addressed another issue, namely the issue of equity. Parties that impose additional burden on infrastructure do not cover the financing burden proportionally. The mechanism that has been developed in the state of New South Wales - Australia, namely the developer’ contribution mechanism, has embryonic-ally been introduced in DKI Jakarta through the Governor’ Regulation (Pergub) No. 175 year 2015 concerning the imposition of compensation for exceeding the building floor coefficient value, which has been amended by the Pergub No. 210 of 2016 concerning the same. This study aims at investigating the similarities and differences between the Pergub and the developer’s contribution mechanism, the depthness, and steps that can be taken to develop the application of the mechanism in DKI Jakarta. For those purposes, the study uses a qualitative research approach. Data collection is mainly carried out by field observations, and interviews with developers, local government officials, and related parties. The analysis uses chronology, comparison, and interpretation methods. Findings of the study demontrate that the mechanism is applicable based on efficiency and equity arguments. In addition, this mechanism is also justified on the bases of current implementation experiences. However, for such an application, a number of aspects need to be fulfilled, namely the clear nexus between the infrastructure built and the advantages of KLB, expanding the scope of the policy, and a stronger policy umbrella, namely Provincial Regulation (Perda) instead of Government’ Regulation.
Keywords: Inovation; Urban Financing; Efficiency and Equity; DKI Jakarta
Abstrak
Inovasi pembiayaan infrastruktur perkotaan di DKI Jakarta perlu terus ditingkatkan, mengingat sumber-sumber pembiayaan konvensional, seperti APBD dan APBN, semakin terbatas di hadapan kebutuhan yang meningkat. Mekanisme seperti Kerjasama Pemerintah – Badan Usaha (KPBU, atau public-private partnership [PPP]) yang sekarang diketengahkan, meskipun menjawab persoalan efisiensi, namun belum menjawab isu lain, yakni persoalan keadilan/ekuiti. Pihak yang memberikan beban tambahan pada infrastruktur tidak menanggung beban pembiayaan yang proporsional. Mekanisme yang berkembang di negara bagian New South Wales - Australia, yakni mekanisme developer’s contribution, secara embrionik telah diintroduksikan di DKI Jakarta melalui Peraturan Gubernur (Pergub) DKI Jakarta No 175 Tahun 2015 tentang Pengenaan Kompensasi terhadap Pelampauan Nilai Koefisien Lantai Bangunan, yang telah diperbaharui menjadi Pergub No 210 Tahun 2016 tentang hal yang sama. Studi ini bertujuan mengkaji kesamaan dan perbedaan Pergub dan mekanisme developer’s contribution, kedalaman, dan langkah-langkah yang dapat dilakukan untuk mengembangkan penerapan mekanisme tersebut di DKI Jakarta. Untuk itu, digunakan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif, dengan melakukan observasi lapangan, dan wawancara mendalam dengan pengembang, Pemerintah Daerah, dan pihak-pihak terkait. Analisis menggunakan metode kronologi, pembandingan, dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kelayakan mekanisme ini diterapkan secara penuh berdasarkan argumentasi efisiensi dan ekuiti. Selain itu, mekanisme ini dijustifikasi berdasarkan pengalaman penerapannya selama ini. Namun, untuk itu sejumlah hal juga perlu dipenuhi, antara lain menguatkan kaitan (nexus) antara infrastruktur yang dibangun dan kelebihan KLB, diperluasnya cakupan kebijakan, dan diperkuatnya payung hukum kebijakan dimaksud.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher (including commercial rights)
References
Artiningsih, A., Putri, N. C., Muktiali, M., & Ma`rif, S. (2019). Skema Pembiayaan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Non-Konvensional di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Riptek, 93-94.
Carrion, C., & Libby, L. W. (2001). Development Impact Fees: A Primer. 1-12.
Department of Planning and Environment NSW. (2019). Secretary`s Practice Note: Local Infrastructure Contributions. New South Wales: Department of Planning and Environment NSW.
Dollery, B., Wallis, J., & Allan, P. (2006). The Debate that Had to Happen But Never Did: The Changing Role of Australian Local Government. Australian Journal of Political Science, 554.
Fahmi, E. (2020). Pendekatan Institusional untuk Kajian Pembangunan Kota dan Real Estate. Bahan Kuliah. Jakarta: Magister Teknik Perencanaan Universitas Tarumanagara.
Fahmi, E. (2021). “Floor Area Uplift atau Developer’s Contribution: Pergub DKI No 210/2016 termasuk rezim yang mana? Sebuah Catatan Pendek”. (Catatan Tidak Dipublikasikan)
Gubernur DKI Jakarta. (2014). Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 1 Tahun 2014. Jakarta: Gubernur DKI Jakarta.
Gubernur DKI Jakarta. (2015). Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 175 Tahun 2015. Jakarta: Gubernur DKI Jakarta.
Gubernur DKI Jakarta. (2016). Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 210 Tahun 2016. Jakarta: Gubernur DKI Jakarta.
Gurran, N., Ruming, K., & Randolph, B. (2009). Counting The Costs: Planning Requirements, Infrastructure Contributions, and Residential Development In Australia. Sydney: AHURI.
GLNPlanning. (2019). Mid-Western Regional Contributions Plan 2019. Sydney: GLN Planning.
Hidayat, B. (2020). Land Value Capture for Indonesia and Beyond: Land Value Capture and Transit-Oriented Development. Jakarta: Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.
IPART. (2019). Indexation of Contribution Rates. New South Wales: IPART.
Kirwan, R. (1991). The National Housing Strategy: Financing Urban Infrastructure: Equity and Efficiency Considerations. Sydney: Urban Policy Associates Pty Limited.
Liong, J. T., Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., Herlambang, S., & Astuti, W. (2020). Space Grabs: Colonizing the Vertical City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1-11.
Mungkasa, O. (2017). Implementasi Insentif dan Disinsentif Penataan Ruang DKI Jakarta. Jakarta: Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Murakami, T. (2015). “Transit Oriented Development and Land Value Capture in Japan”. Paper presented at the MLIT Knowledge Sharing Seminar on “Sharing Good Practices on TOD”, June 30
Natalia, E. C. (2018, August 07). Australia Alami Ledakan Jumlah Penduduk 10 Tahun Lebih Cepat. Retrieved from CNBC Indonesia: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20180807183555-4-27451/australia-alami-ledakan-jumlah-penduduk-10-tahun-lebih-cepat
NSW Productivity Commission. (2020). Review of Infrastructure Contributions In New South Wales. New South Wales: NSW Productivity Commission.
O`Flynn, L. (2011). History of Development Contributions Under The NSW Planning System. New South Wales: NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service.
Suparto, J. D. (2020). Kebijakan Developer’s Contribution Di DKI Jakarta: Kajian terhadap Pergub DKI Jakarta No 210/2016 tentang Pengenaan Kompensasi terhadap Pelampauan Nilai Koefisien Lantai Bangunan. Tesis (tidak dipublikasikan). Jakarta: Universitas Tarumanagara.
The CIE. (2020). Final Report: Evaluation of Infrastructure Contributions Reform in New South Wales. Canberra: Centre for International Economics.
The Skyscraper Center. (2020). Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved from The Skyscraper Center: https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/city/jakarta