Focus and Scope

Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan (P-ISSN 2579-6402 dan E-ISSN 2579-6410) memuat artikel ilmiah dalam bidang:

  1. Sains & Teknologi
    • Ilmu Teknik Sipil
    • Ilmu Teknik Mesin
    • Ilmu Teknik Elektro
    • Ilmu Teknik Industri
    • Ilmu Sistem Informasi
    • Ilmu Teknik Arsitektur
    • Ilmu Teknologi Informasi
    • Ilmu Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota
    • Ilmu Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
  2. Kedokteran
    • Ilmu Kedokteran Umum
    • Ilmu Kedokteran Spesialis
    • Ilmu Kedokteran Gigi dan Mulut
    • Ilmu Spesialis Kedokteran Gigi dan Mulut
  3. Ilmu Kesehatan 
    • Ilmu Kesehatan Umum
    • Ilmu Keperawatan dan Kebidanan

Jurnal Muara dikelola oleh Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat - Universitas Tarumanagara (DPPM - UNTAR) diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun (April dan Oktober) dalam rangka mendukung upaya pemerintah Republik Indonesia, khususnya Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi untuk meningkatkan jumlah publikasi ilmiah di tingkat Nasional. Jurnal Muara ini juga dapat menjadi wadah publikasi bagi para mahasiswa (S1, S2 maupun S3) dan dosen di lingkungan perguruan tinggi. Setiap artikel yang dimuat telah melalui proses reviu.


Section Policies

Cover dan Halaman Awal

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Peer Review Process

Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan (P-ISSN 2579-6402 dan E-ISSN 2579-6410) is a national journal published by Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Tarumanagara. Articles submitted in this journal will be peer-reviewed before it can be published. Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Chief Editors through a forum with editor board according to Reviewers comments.

Type(s) of peer review does this journal use:

  • Editorial review
  • Peer review
  • Anonymous peer review
  • Double anonymous peer review


Publication Frequency

JMSTKIK published twice a year. The first volume will be published on April and second volume in October.


Open Access Policy

All articles published by JMSTKIK by Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat have undergone peer review and immediately upon publication are freely available online for everyone to read and download.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JMSTKIK by Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/jmistki



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publications Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan is a journal aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on Sains, Technology, Medical, Health Science as well as related topics that has neither been published elsewhere in any language, nor is it under review for publication anywhere. This following statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor, the reviewer, and the publisher (Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat - LPPM). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
  3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced
  4. Acknowledgement of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
  5. Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgement section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
  6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  7. Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
  8. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use.


Duties of Editor

  1. Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
  2. Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
  3. Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
  4. Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest


Duties of Reviewers

  1. Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  2. Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
  3. Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work
  4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.  Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
  5. Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.


Article Processing Charges

Every article submitted to Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan will not have any article processing charges.

  • Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
  • Fast-Track Review: 0.00 (IDR)
  • Article Publication: 0.00 (IDR)


Copy Editing And Proofreading

Every article accepted by Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan shall be an object to Grammarly® writing-enhancement program conducted by Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Editorial Board.


References Management

use APA style, download here


Plagiarism Check

Plagiarism screening will be conducted by JMSTKIK Editorial Board using Turnitin. The maximum similarity percentage is 20%, in which for each source the maximum similarity percentage is 4%. When the similarity percentage is above the threshold, JMSTKIK has the right to reject the paper.



Copyright Notice

This work is licensed under a Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.



Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Universitas Tarumanagara

Kampus 1 Jl. Letjen S. Parman No.1

Jakarta 11440

021-5671747 Ext. 215

  • Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Tarumanagara


Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat


Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Universitas Tarumanagara

Kampus 1 Jl. Letjen S. Parman No.1

Jakarta 11440

021-5671747 Ext. 215

Universitas Tarumanagara


Journal History

Sejarah Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, dan Ilmu Kesehatan

Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, dan Ilmu Kesehatan merupakan satu dari Tiga Serangkai Jurnal Muara yang diterbitkan oleh Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Tarumanagara, yaitu: Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni (JMISHS); Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis (JMIEB), dan Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, dan Ilmu Kesehatan (JMSTKIK). Edisi perdana dari ketiga Jurnal Muara tersebut terbit pada bulan April 2017.

Lahirnya Tiga Serangkai Jurnal Muara tersebut tidak dapat dilepaskan dari pelaksanaan Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin (SNRM) 2017 pada hari Jumat dan Sabtu, tanggal 24 dan 25 Maret 2017.  Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin 2017 merupakan Seminar Nasional yang digagas oleh Rektor Universitas Tarumanagara (Prof. Dr. Agustinus Purna Irawan, S.T., M.T.), untuk menyediakan wadah publikasi terutama bagi para dosen (terutama dosen muda), mahasiswa, maupun para praktisi dari berbagai disiplin ilmu.  Gagasan Rektor Untar tersebut ditindaklanjuti oleh Direktur Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Untar  (Jap Tji Beng, Ph.D.) yang membentuk Panitia Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin (SNRM) pada pada tanggal 14 Januari 2017.  Pada tanggal 1 Februari 2017, panitia memulai langkah publikasi kegiatan SNRM 2017 ke sekitar 48 perguruan tinggi di Indonesia.  Pada pelaksanaannya, SNRM 2017 diikuti oleh 27 perguruan tinggi seluruh Indonesia.

Dalam Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin (SNRM) yang dimulai tahun 2017 tersebut, dibangun kelompok-kelompok presentasi dan diskusi khusus bidang ilmu, namun para peserta dari berbagai bidang ilmu lain dapat masuk ke kelompok-kelompok presentasi dan diskusi yang mereka minati. Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin 2017 telah berperan sebagai wadah bagi akademisi dan praktisi untuk mempelajari cara pikir dari berbagai bidang keilmuwan.  Pertemuan ilmiah multidisiplin semacam ini telah menjadi trend yang berkembang di Asia.  Pertemuan ilmiah multidisiplin menjadi wadah bagi para akademisi untuk memahami cara berpikir bidang-bidang ilmu yang berbeda, sehingga dapat terbentuk pemahaman dan kolaborasi yang sulit dicapai apabila setiap bidang ilmu terisolasi dari pemikiran bidang lainnya.

Salah satu produk penting dari Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin 2017 ini adalah makalah-makalah.  Makalah-makalah tersebut kemudian melalui serangkaian proses. Dengan demikian, artikel-artikel yang terbit dalam Tiga Serangkai Jurnal Muara 2017 merupakan artikel-artikel terpilih yang telah melalui dua proses: (a) proses presentasi dan pemerolehan masukan dari para peserta SNRM 2017 yang mengikuti presentasi makalah tersebut, dan (c) proses review dan perbaikan oleh penulis melalui OJS (Online Journal System).  Artikel yang bersumber dari makalah tersebut diterbitkan dalam tiga jurnal yang berbeda sesuai bidang ilmu yang menjadi penekanan utama dari makalah tersebut: bidang ilmu sosial, humaniora, dan seni; bidang ilmu ekonomi dan bisnis; dan bidang sains, teknologi, kedokteran dan ilmu kesehatan. Dalam perkembangan selanjutnya, ketiga jurnal tersebut juga menerima artikel-artikel yang dikirimkan secara mandiri, di luar Seminar Nasional Riset Multidisiplin.

Nama Jurnal “Muara” diperoleh melalui proses brain-storming dalam salah satu rapat yang dihadiri Jap Tji Beng, Ph.D., Sri Tiatri, Ph.D., Dr. Fransisca Iriani R. Dewi, M.Si., dan Agus Budi Dharmawan, S.Kom., S.T., M.Sc. di Ruang Rapat Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (DPPM) pada bulan Maret 2017.  Setelah melalui proses diskusi yang panjang, nama “Muara” dikemukakan oleh Direktur PPM (Jap Tji Beng, Ph.D.).  Dari sisi sejarah, “Muara” adalah nama salah satu Prasasti Kerajaan Tarumanagara, yaitu nama kerajaan yang dijadikan nama Universitas Tarumanagara. Selain itu, “Muara” adalah akhir dari perjalanan sungai. Melalui perumpamaan suatu sungai, suatu penelitian yang dilaksanakan bermuara dalam publikasi ilmiah di suatu jurnal ilmiah. Jurnal Muara melambangkan muara dari perjalanan suatu penelitian. Selanjutnya proses penciptaan sampul jurnal yang melambangkan muara sungai, dilakukan oleh Sri Tiatri, Ph.D. bersama dosen Fakultas Seni Rupa dan Disain Untar, Heru Budi Kusuma, S.Sn., M.Ds. Warna menjadi pembeda dari Tiga Serangkai Jurnal Muara. Sementara itu, hal-hal yang terkait teknik informatika dilakukan oleh Agus Budi Dharmawan, S.Kom., M.T., M.Sc., dibantu seorang mahasiswa Fakultas Teknologi Informasi, yaitu Nadia Ramadani. Selanjutnya, masing-masing jurnal dari Tiga Serangkai Jurnal Muara diasuh oleh para pengasuh yang berbeda, dan berkembang dengan arah masing-masing.

Tiga Serangkai Jurnal Muara diharapkan dapat berkelanjutan, dan memberikan kontribusi yang bermakna bagi kehidupan masyarakat, khususnya untuk mengembangkan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi, serta menyampaikan alternatif-alternatif solusi terhadap permasalahan masyarakat. Jurnal ini diharapkan terus berkembang, berkelanjutan, dan menjadi wadah publikasi yang bermanfaat bagi masyarakat luas.