FAKTOR PENENTU KINERJA INOVASI PEMIMPIN MAL DI JAKARTA: PERAN ORIENTASI KEWIRAUSAHAAN DAN KEPEMIMPINAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN

Main Article Content

Sia Lily Bramaputri
Eddy Supriyatna Marizar

Abstract

Kinerja inovasi para pimpinan mal sangat penting bagi kelangsungan mal di Jakarta. Oleh karena itu, perlu ditingkatkan. Kinerja inovasi pemimpin mal di Jakarta dapat ditingkatkan salah satunya dengan cara meningkatkan orientasi kewirausahaan dan kepemimpinan kewirausahaan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah agar dapat melakukan analisis faktor yang menentukan kinerja inovasi pimpinan mal di Jakarta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kuantitatif dan dilakukan di Jakarta dengan subjek penelitian adalah pimpinan mall yang berada di bawah kelompok XYZ. Data penelitian didasarkan pada sumber data primer yaitu melalui survei dengan menggunakan kuesioner berdasarkan tiga variabel yang ingin diukur yaitu orientasi kewirausahaan, kepemimpinan kewirausahaan, dan kinerja inovasi. Dari populasi tersebut diambil sampel penelitian sebanyak 129 orang berdasarkan metode simple random sampling. Penelitian ini memberikan hasil bahwa orientasi kewirausahaan serta kepemimpinan kewirausahaan memberikan pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja inovasi pimpinan mal di bawah kelompok XYZ. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah penelitian ini dapat menjadi rujukan dalam mengembangkan berbagai program dasar kepemimpinan bagi para pemimpin mal dengan memperhatikan kapasitas orientasi kewirausahaan dan kepemimpinan kewirausahaan.


 


The innovation performance of mall leaders is very important for the survival of malls in Jakarta. Therefore, it needs to be improved. Several factors that can improve the innovation performance of mall leaders in Jakarta are entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial leadership. The aim of this research is to be able to analyze the factors that determine the innovation performance of mall leaders in Jakarta. The research method used was a quantitative research method and was carried out in Jakarta with the research subjects being mall leaders under the XYZ group. Research data is based on primary data sources, namely through surveys using questionnaires based on the three variables to be measured, namely entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial leadership, and innovation performance. From this population, a research sample of 129 people was taken based on the simple random sampling method. This research shows that entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial leadership have a positive and significant influence on the innovation performance of mall leaders under the XYZ group.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Eddy Supriyatna Marizar, Magister Manajemen, Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta

Magister Manajemen, Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta

References

Abu-Rumman, A., Al Shraah, A., Al-Madi, F., & Alfalah, T. (2021). Entrepreneurial networks, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance of small and medium enterprises: are dynamic capabilities the missing link? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00170-8

AL-Khatib, A. W. (2022). Intellectual capital and innovation performance: the moderating role of big data analytics: evidence from the banking sector in Jordan. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(3), 391–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-10-2021-0154

Bagheri, A., & Harrison, C. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership measurement: a multi-dimensional construct. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2019-0027

Bassiti, L. El, & Ajhoun, R. (2016). Continuous performance improvement of innovation: Bridging the gap between creativity and measurement. Proceedings of the 28th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth, June 2017, 4248–4262.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2017). The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic leadership. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset, 307–327.

Emre Yildiz, H., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. (2021). Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective. Technovation, 99(August), 102130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102130

Ernstson, H., Sörlin, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services - The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad

Etemad, H. (2021). Revisiting aspects of entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial intentions, international entrepreneurship, and their corresponding consequences. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 19(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00304-9

Ghantous, N., & Alnawas, I. (2020). The differential and synergistic effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on hotel ambidexterity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102072.

Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00040-5

Harrison, P., & Roomi, M. A. (2011). Entrepreneurial Leadership: What Is It and How Should It Be Taught? International Review of Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 1–43.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268384918_Entrepreneurial_Leadership_What_Is_It_and_How_Should_It_Be_Taught/citation/download

Horner, M. (1997). Leadership theory: Past, present and future. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 3(4), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527599710195402

Indonesia, C. (2021). 6 Ritel yang Tutup Selama Pandemi Corona. Cnn Indonesia.

Kimbu, A. N., de Jong, A., Adam, I., Ribeiro, M. A., Afenyo-Agbe, E., Adeola, O., & Figueroa-Domecq, C. (2021). Recontextualising gender in entrepreneurial leadership. Annals of Tourism Research, 88, 103176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103176

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763

Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(00)00045-6

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1996.9602161568

Marizar, E. S., Widjaja, I., & Mutiara, M. W. (2022). Creative Management Strategy in Creativepreneurship. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 6(2), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v6i2.18682

Moeldoko. (2022). M-leadership: Berani Memimpin. Bukurepublika.

Musara, M., & Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2020). Informal sector entrepreneurship, individual entrepreneurial orientation and the emergence of entrepreneurial leadership. Africa Journal of Management, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2020.1777817

Mutiara, M. W., Irawan, A. P., & Marizar, E. S. (2023). Design Management in Today’S Business: a Review. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, 1(2), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.24912/v1i2.889-898

Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. In Management Review Quarterly (Vol. 71, Issue 2). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7

Nguyen, P. V., Huynh, H. T. N., Lam, L. N. H., Le, T. B., & Nguyen, N. H. X. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on SMEs’ performance: the mediating effects of organizational factors. Heliyon, 7(6), e07326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07326

Petriella, Y. (2020). Pandemi Covid-19, Pusat Perbelanjaan Yang Paling Terdampak. Ekonomi.Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20200917/47/1293128/pandemi-covid-19-pusat-perbelanjaan-paling-terdampak

Pintea, M.-O., & Achim, M.-V. (2010). Performance - An Evolving Concept. Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, 2(38), 1–12.

Salem, I. E., Elbaz, A. M., Al-Alawy, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Elkhwesky, Z. (2022). Is eco-label hotel engagement the pathway to sustainability practices via entrepreneurial resilience and orientation in Oman? Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2022-0229

Singh, S. K., Mazzucchelli, A., Vessal, S. R., & Solidoro, A. (2021). Knowledge-based HRM practices and innovation performance: Role of social capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100830

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2011). Do transformational leaders enhance their followers’ daily work engagement? Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.011

Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2022). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00464-5

Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611418261

Wales, W. J., Kraus, S., Filser, M., Stöckmann, C., & Covin, J. G. (2021). The status quo of research on entrepreneurial orientation: Conversational landmarks and theoretical scaffolding. Journal of Business Research, 128, 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.046

Zia, N. U. (2020). Knowledge-oriented leadership, knowledge management behaviour and innovation performance in project-based SMEs. The moderating role of goal orientations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1819–1839. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0127