SOME FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE ON DEBT POLICY
Main Article Content
Abstract
A company is considered at risk if it has a large portion of debt in its capital structure, but conversely, if a company uses little or no debt at all, the company is considered unable to take advantage of additional external capital that can improve the company's operations. Based on these reasons, managers are required to be more careful in determining debt policies in their companies. Meanwhile, according to the trade of theory, the higher the debt, the higher the bankruptcy burden. Based on the general assumptions of the pecking order theory and trade of theory, the use of debt should be low. However, many companies still pay high debt. From these reasons, research on debt policy needs to be examined. This study aims to empirically prove the impact of company characteristics, asset structure, and profitability on debt policies in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2019-2021. The data used in this study were 28 companies. The sample used was 84 sample data selected using purposive sampling method which were processed using EViews version 12. The result of this study indicates that all independent variables simultaneously have no significant impact on debt policy as shown by the results of the F test. The results of the T test explain that company characteristics have a negative and insignificant impact on debt policy, asset structure has a negative and insignificant impact on debt policy, and profitability has a positive and insignificant impact on debt policy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
IJAEB by Graduate Program of Universitas Tarumanagara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/ijaeb
References
Abubakar, D. Y., Daat, S. C., & Sanggenafa, M. A. (2020). Pengaruh Tangibility, Profitabilitas, Growth, Risiko Bisnis dan Likuiditas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Daerah, 15(1), 113-128.
Alkhatib, K. (2012). The determinants of leverage of listed companies. International journal of business and social science, 3(24).
Andrianti, A., Abbas, D. S., & Hakim, M. Z. (2021, June). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Likuiditas, Pertumbuhan Penjualan Dan Struktur Aset Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (pp. 614-623).
Arya, D., Rochmawati, L., & Sonhaji, I. (2020). Koefisien Korelasi (R) Dan Koefisien Determinasi (R2). Jurnal Penelitian, 5(4), 289-296.
Astuti, E. (2015). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, 15(02), 149-158.
Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2017). Analisis multivariat dan ekonometrika: teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan eview 10.
Hikmawati, M. N., Ulfah, Y., & Fakhroni, Z. (2017). Pengaruh pertumbuhan penjualan, dividen, dan investasi terhadap hutang pada perusahaan manufaktur terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia. Jurnal bisnis dan akuntansi
Indahningrum, R. P., & Handayani, R. (2009). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dividen, pertumbuhan perusahaan, free cash flow dan profitabilitas terhadap kebijakan hutang perusahaan. Jurnal bisnis dan akuntansi, 11(3), 189-207.
Jensen, M., C., dan W. Meckling, 1976. “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure”, Journal of Finance Economic 3:305- 360, di-download dari http://www.nhh.no/for/courses/spring/eco420/jensenmeckling-76.pdf.
Jama’an. (2008). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance dan Kualitas Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Integritas Informasi Laporan Keuangan (Studi Pada Perusahaan Publik Di BEJ).Tesis Strata-2.Program Studi Magister Sains Akuntansi.Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Manoppo, M., Mangantar, M., & Van Rate, P. (2018). Pengaruh Struktur Aset Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Otomotif Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Periode 2012-2016. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 6(3).
Mulyati, Y. (2016). PENGARUH STRUKTUR ASSET DAN PERTUMBUHAN PENJUALAN TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN UTANG. UNEJ e-Proceeding, [S.l.], p. 813-831, dec. 2016.
Narita, R. M. (2012). ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN HUTANG. Jurnal Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Novitasari, D. P., & Viriany. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Likuiditas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Multiparadigma Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta.
Pradhana, A., Taufik, T., & Anggraini, L. (2014). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Food and Beverages yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Riau University).
Rohmah, U. A., Andini, R., & Pranaditya, A. (2018). PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KEBIJAKAN DIVIDEN DAN INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG DENGAN FREE CASH FLOW SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI. Journal Of Accounting.
SARI, M. A. P. (2012). PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL, KEBIJAKAN DIVIDEN, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, STRUKTUR AKTIVA, DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG Pada Perusahaan Properti dan Real estate yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2005-2010 (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO).
Sheisarvian, R. M., Sudjana, N., & Saifi, M. (2015). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kebijakan Dividen dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang (Studi pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Tercatat di BEI Periode 2010-2012). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 22(1).
Surya, D., & Rahayuningsih, D. A. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan hutang perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 14(3), 213-225.
Yap, S. (2016). JURNAL BISNIS DAN AKUNTANSI. Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan, Rasio Keuangan, Corporate Tax Rate Dan Non-Debt Tax Shield Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Food and Beverages.
Zogning, F. (2017). Agency theory: A critical review. European journal of business and management, 9(2), 1-8.