THE FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENTS' SATISFACTION WITH BLENDED TEACHING METHODS IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONALIZATION OF EDUCATION AT FOREIGN TRADE UNIVERSITY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study is to determine the factors affecting the students' satisfaction with the blended teaching method, especially in the current international context, making some recommendations to increase the students' satisfaction with the combined teaching method. The research sample is 200 students of Foreign Trade University, using EFA factor analysis to create 4 factors affecting the level of student satisfaction with the teaching method in teaching methods, content of instruction, characteristics of blended learning systems, infrastructure and technology. The research results contribute to help university leaders to consider improving teaching quality and applying information technology to innovate teaching methods in general and English teaching method in particular.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
IJAEB by Graduate Program of Universitas Tarumanagara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/ijaeb
References
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
Graham, C. R. (2005), Blended Learning Systems: Definitions, Current Trends, and Future Directions, In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
Graham, C. R. (2012). Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning, In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 333-350). Routledge.
Knight, J. (2003). Internationalization of higher education: New directions, new challenges. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 25(3), 241-257.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2009). Marketing Management (13th ed.), Pearson International Edition.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
Meyer, K. A., & Xu, Y. J. (2009). Understanding the factors that affect student–faculty interaction in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(3), 267-288.
Nguyen, K.H., Huynh, V.S. & Nguyen, V.K. (2015), Some factors influencing the integrated teaching capacity of lecturers. Accessed on April 15, 2023, at: http://journal.hcmue.edu.vn/index.php/hcmuejos/article/download/344/336
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale, Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420-450.
Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7-18.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135.
Vu, T.G. & Nguyen, H.N. (2019), Blended learning: A suitable learning modality for higher education in Vietnam at the digital age. Accessed on April 15, 2023, at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33107166.
Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.