THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL IN ANALYZING ATTITUDES TOWARD THE ADOPTION OF FINTECH
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The intention of this study is to find empirical prooving regarding the relationship model of Perceived Risk, Perceived Ease-of-Use, and Perceived Usefulness against Attitudes Toward the Adoption of FinTech, by adopting the Technology Acceptance Model theoretical approach. The source of the data used is primary data derived from questionnaires which are distributed directly to respondents using a questionnaire with a Google Form format. Respondents are limited to users of banking services and marketplaces who are domiciled in Jakarta and its surroundings. Data were collected using non-probability sampling method. The instrument used is a structured questionnaire of 14 questions which are arranged based on indicators and dimensions derived from each variable. This study uses the multiple regression method with the support of the Smart PLS version 3. The finding of this study show that Perceived Risk, Perceived Ease-of-Use, and Perceived Usefulness have a positive effect on Attitudes Toward the Adoption of FinTech Services.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
IJAEB by Graduate Program of Universitas Tarumanagara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/ijaeb
References
Y. Kim, Y.-J. Park, J. Choi, & J. Yeon, An Empirical Study on the Adoption of “Fintech” Service: Focused on Mobile Payment Services, no. April, pp. 136–140, 2015.
M. Soriano et al., The Asean Fintech Ecosystem Benchmarking Study, Cambridge, UK., 2019.
OJK, Statistik Fintech, Statistik Fintech, 2020.
H.-S. Ryu, Understanding Benefit and Risk Framework of Fintech Adoption : Comparison of Early Adopters and Late Adopters, Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3864–3873, 2018.
H. R. Khedmatgozar & A. Shahnazi, The Role of Dimensions of Perceived Risk in Adoption of Corporate Internet Banking by Customers in Iran, Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 389–412, 2018.
Z. Hu, S. Ding, S. Li, L. Chen, & S. Yang, Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users : An Empirical Examination With an Extended Technology Acceptance Model, Symmetry, vol. 11, no. 3, 2019.
F. D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease-of-Use and User Aceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989.
S. Alharbi & S. Drew, Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academic’s Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014.
F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, & P. R. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989.
G. Maciejewski, The Meaning of Perceived Risk in Purchasing Decisions of The Polish Customers, Scientific Annals of the University of Iasi, vol. LVIII, no. August, 2011.
N. L. P. Indiani, I. K. Rahyuda, N. N. Kerti Yasa, & I. P. G. Sukaatmadja, Perceived Risk and Trust as Major Determinants of Actual Purchase, Transcending The Influence of Intention, ASEAN Marketing Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015.
J. R. Bettman, Perceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 184, 1973.
V. W. Mitchell, Understanding Consumer’s Behaviour : Can Perceived Risk Theory Help?, Management Decision, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 26–31, 1992. [14] W. L. Wilkie & E. A. Pessemier, Issues in Marketing’s Use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 428, 1973.
T. Nakashima, Creating Credit By Baking Use of Mobility With Fintech and IoT, IATSS Research, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 2018.
Chuen & Teo, Emergence of Fintech and the Lasic Principles, Journal of Financial Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2015.
I. Lee & Y. J. Shin, Fintech: Ecosystem, Business Models, Investment Decisions, and Challenges, Business Horizons, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003.
A. S. Marsudi & Y. Widjaja, Industri 4.0 Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Financial Technology Serta Kesiapan Tenaga Kerja Di Indonesia, Ikraith Ekonomika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2019.
Indonesian Financial Services Authority, Financial Services Authority: Financial Literacy And Inclusion Index Increases, Ojk, pp. 1–6, 2016.
Jarvis et al, A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research, vol. 30, no. September 2003, 2003.
S. Okazaki & F. Mendez, Repositorio Institucional de La Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Exploring Convenience in Mobile Commerce : Moderating Effects of Gender, vol. 3, pp. 1234–1242, 2013.
P. Kurniasari & S. Priambada, Analisis Persepsi Kemanfaatan Dan Persepsi Kemudahan Terhadap Minat Perilaku Penggunaan Aplikasi Transportasi Online Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, Administrasi Bisnis, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2018.
S. K. Abbas, H. A. Hassan, J. Asif, B. Ahmed, F. Hassan, & S. S. Haider, Integration of TTF, UTAUT, and ITM for Mobile Banking Adoption, International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 375–379, 2018.
Forsythe et al, Development of A Scale to Measure the Perceived Benefits and Risk of Obline Shopping, Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2–20, 2006.
H. E. Riquelme & R. E. Rios, The Moderating Effect of Gender in the Adoption of Mobile Banking, International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 328–341, 2010. [26]J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, & J. A. Mena, An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 414–433, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11747- 011-0261-6.
S. Grabner-Kräuter & R. Faullant, Consumer Acceptance of Internet Banking : The Influence of Internet Trust, International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 483–504, 2008.
B. Marakarkandy, N. Yajnik, & C. Dasgupta, Enabling Internet Banking Adoption : An Empirical Examination With an Augmented Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 263–294, 2017.
H. J. Huh, T. (Terry) Kim, & R. Law, A Comparison of Competing Theoretical Models for Understanding Acceptance Behavior of Information Systems in Upscale Hotels, International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 121–134, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.004.
T. C. E. Cheng, D. Y. . Lam, & A. C. L. Yeung, An Empirical Study of the Impact of Brand Name on Personal Customers’ Adoption of Internet Banking in Hongkong, International Journal of e-Business Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–51, 2010.
Y. S. Wang, Y. M. Wang, H. H. Lin, & T. I. Tang, Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking : An Empirical Study, International Journal of Service Industry Management, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 501–519, 2003.
I. Ghozali & H. Latan., Partial Least Squares Concepts, Techniques, and Applications Using the SmartPLS 3.0.ed 2. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2015.