ANALISIS SENGKETA PENARIKAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA SECARA PAKSA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO.113/PDT.G/2018/PN.BTM)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fiduciary guarantee is a creditor's loan agreement to the debtor that involves guarantee. When the
debtor or fiduciary giver breaks his promise or does not fulfill his performance on time to the creditor,
the execution of the fiduciary guarantee will be applied, namely the withdrawal of the object that has
been agreed upon. Eddy Lim (plaintif ) sued PT Maybank Indonesia Finance (defendant) because he
considered that his actions in withdrawing and executing the object of fiduciary security, namely one
unit of a four-wheeled vehicle with the Datsun Co-Panca brand, were not in accordance with the
existing rules and regulations and should only be carried out by the court through an auction, so that
the plaintif feels that he has been harmed. The Plaintif and the Defendant have made a financing
agreement with a fiduciary transfer of property rights, namely the plaintif will pay in installments with
an installment payment agreement period of 36 months, starting from November 2014 to October
2017. However, the plaintif did not make a deposit for 3 months, therefore the defendant pull objects.
However, the court's decision rejected the plaintif 's application due to the non-fulfillment of relative
competence and an error in persona. The purpose of this study is to know and understand the law of
guarantees in disputes over the forcible withdrawal of fiduciary objects. The types of data used are
primary data and secondary data.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
BUKU
Abdulkadir Muhammad, “Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum” Cet. I, Bandung : PT. Citra
AdityaBakti, 2004
Burhan Ashsofa, “Metode Penelitian Hukum”, Cetakan ke-5, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,
D.Y Witanto, “Hukum Jaminan Fidusia”, (Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju, 2015)
Dyah, Susanti dan A’a Efendi, “Penelitian Hukum”, Cetakan ke-1, (Jakarta:Sinar
Grafika, 2014)
JP. Frtzgerald, “Salmond on Jurisprudenc e”, (London: Sweet & Mazwell, 1966)
M.Yahya Harahap, “Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan
Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali” (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,
Munir Fuady, “Hukum Perkreditan Kontemporer”, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti,
Nurnaningsih Amriani, “Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di
Pengadilan”, (Jakarta: Penerbit : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012)
Peter M. Marzuki, “Penelitian Hukum”, Cetakan ke-8, (Jakarta: Kencana, Prenada
Media Group, 2013)
Syahmin, “Hukum Perjanjian Internasional”, ( Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada,
)
Soedikno Mertokusumo, “Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar”, (Yogyakarta: Liberty,
Usaman, “Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan”, (Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Grafika, 2009)
Wirjono Projodikoro, “Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata”, (Jakarta: Sumur Bandung, 1979)
Yurizal, “Aspek Pidana dalam Undang-undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang
Jaminan Fidusia”, (Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2015)
iBoedi iHarsono,”Akibat iHukum iJaminan iFidusia”,Ghalia,Jakarta.
iMunir iFuady. i2003. “Jaminan iFidusia”. iBandung: iPT. iCitra iAditya iBakti.
Hamzah iDan iSenjum iManulang,”Hukum iJaminan” Rineka iCipta,Jakarta.
Gunawan iWidjaja idan iAhmad iYani, i2007, I”Seri iHukum iBisnis iJaminan
iFidusia”, iRaja iGrafindo iPersada, iJakarta,
Ratna ArthaWindari, 2014, “Hukum Perjanjian”, Yogyakarta, Graha Ilmu,
Hartono Hadisoeprapto, 1984, “Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum
Jaminan”, Yogyakarta, Liberty,
Subekti, 2011, “Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata”, Jakarta, PT. Intermasa,
PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN
Undang-undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia
Peraturan Kapolri No. 8 tahun 2011