PENERAPAN, PENGELOLAAN, DAN PERTANGGUNG-JAWABAN ATAS BENDA SITAAN DAN BARANG RAMPASAN NEGARA DI RUMAH PENYIMPANAN BENDA SITAAN NEGARA (RUPBASAN JAMBI)
Main Article Content
Abstract
In May 2019, three civil servants from the Jambi Kumham Regional Of ice were arrested for stealing
11 cellphones at the State Property Confiscated Objects Storage (RUPBASAN) of ice. RUPBASAN
should be a safe place for confiscated, but with the theft case in RUPBASAN, it is certainly interesting
to examine juridically regarding the cause of the case, legal protection for confiscated goods,
obstacles experienced by RUPBASAN and handling ef orts. Referring to these problems, the author
uses empirical juridical research methods. Based on the results of the study when referring to the
theory of law enforcement according to Friedman, namely structure, substance and culture, then in this
case the structure and substance of the law have actually been formed, the lack of a sense of
responsibility to keep objects from being lost, dishonesty and abuse of power for selfish purposes
shows the culture that exists within the implementing of icers that causes such cases to occur. The
obstacles experienced by the Jambi RUPBASAN are Internal Constraints and External Constraints.
Ef orts to resolve these obstacles are by strengthening coordination and synchronization.
Strengthening coordination between the Government, the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the
Indonesian National Police, RUPBASAN, and parties related to the management of confiscated objects
and state confiscations, so that internal problems can be resolved. Synchronization of work guidelines,
management regulations and regulations for implementing cooperation in the management of
confiscated objects and state confiscations, so that in the process of implementing the management of
confiscated objects and state confiscated goods.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. BUKU
Amiruddin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Persada, 2006.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN) Departemen Kehakiman. KUHP
dan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2007.
Bakhari, Syaiful. Dinamika Hukum Pembuktian. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada,
Friedman, Lawrence M. diterjemahkan oleh Wishnu Basuki. Hukum Amerika
Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2001.
Husni, Frieda Hasbullah. Hukum Kebendaan Perdata: Hak-Hak yang
Memberikan Kenikmatan. Jakarta : Ind-Hill Co. 2002.
Kelsen, Hans (a). sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Somardi, General Theory Of
law and State , Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu
Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif Empirik. Jakarta: BEE
Media Indonesia, 2007.
Marpaung, Leden. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana Penyelidikan dan
Penyidikan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Nurul, Ratna Afifah. Barang Bukti Dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta:
Balai Pustaka. 2009
Sagala, Hari. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar
Maju, 2018.
Simanjuntak, P.N.H. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia. 2015.
Sofyan, Andi dan Abd. Asis. Hukum Acara Pidana Sautu Pengantar. Jakarta:
Prenada Media Group, 2014.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI press, 2006.
Yahya, M. Harahap. Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan,
Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika,
B. ARTIKEL JURNAL ONLINE
Anonim, miris-3-pns-kanwil-kumham-jambi-malah-curi-11 hp sitaan di
rupbasan jambi. Jakarta: news.detik.com, 27 mei 2019.