ANALISIS PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PEMALSUAN SURAT KETERANGAN RAPID TEST ANTIGEN DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JEMBER NOMOR 205/PID.SUS/2021/PN.JMR

Main Article Content

Feby Egatri Gulo
R Rahaditya

Abstract

Today, the world is being shaken by a great pandemic called Covid-19 (Corona Virus Disease). One of the countries experiencing the impact of this virus outbreak is Indonesia. So, through this, the Government has the authority to take action in solving a problem, one of which is by showing a Health Certificate of Antigen Rapid Test which is used as a condition for traveling to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 Virus. This study aims to find out how the Criminal Analysis of Counterfeiting of Antigen Rapid Test Certificates in the Jember District Court Decision Number 205/PID.SUS/2021/PN.JMR and evaluate the judge's considerations in deciding this case. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research supported by interview data with experts. Through this research, although forgery has been regulated in the Criminal Code, but regarding the Crime of Counterfeiting Health Certificates, it has not been regulated explicitly. Regarding the sentencing decision, the researcher disagrees because in considering and deciding this criminal case, the judge is considered to be more considerate of the elements and aspects of the occurrence of a crime in aggravating circumstances. So by considering the existing elements, the sentence given is more appropriate by referring to Article 35 jo. Article 51 of Law Number 11 of 2018 concerning ITE as the legal purpose. Researchers suggest that in imposing a sentence on every judicial institution and judge not only decide based on their belief alone, but also based on their responsibilities and values in society.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. BUKU

Achmad, Yulianto dan Mukti Fajar ND. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif

dan Empiris, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2015).

Bawengan, Gerson W. Pengantar Psikologi Kriminil. (Jakarta: Pradnya

Paramita, 1997).

Budhijanto, Danrivanto. Revolusi Cyberlaw Indonesia (Pembaruan dan Revisi UU

ITE 2016). (Bandung: Reflika Aditama, 2017).

Burhan, Ashofa. Metode Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2000).

Chazawi, Adami. Kejahatan Terhadap Pemalsuan. (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo

Persada, 2001).

Diantha, Pasek Made I. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam

Justifikasi Teori Hukum. (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019).

Ding, Julian. E-commerce: Law and Practice. (Malaysia: Sweet and Maxwell

Asia, 2009)

Harifin A. Tumpa. Menuju Peradilan yang Agung. (Yogyakarta: Rangkang

Education, 2012).

Hiariej S.O Eddy. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. (Yogyakarta: Cahaya

Atma Pustaka, 2020).

Soedarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. (Bandung: Alumni, 1983).

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. (Jakarta:

Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001).

Widijowati, Dijan. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi,

.

B. PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

(UUD NRI 1945).

_____. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

_____. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan

Bencana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 66,

Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4723).

C. JURNAL dan MAKALAH

Dana, Putra Suar Kadek I et al., “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Tenaga Medis Yang

Melakukan Pemalsuan Surat Keterangan Rapid Test Covid 19”. Jurnal

Interpretasi Hukum. Vol. 2 No. 1 Tahun 2021.

Wahidah, Idah et al., “Pandemik Covid-19: Analisis Perencanaan Pemerintah

dan Masyarakat Dalam Berbagai Upaya Pencegahan”. Jurnal Manajemen

dan Organisasi (JMO). Vol. 11 No.3 Tahun 2020