PIDANA MATI SEBAGAI SARANA EXTRA ORDINARY DALAM MEMBERANTAS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Main Article Content

Haninah Mahfoedz

Abstract

Corruption is now increasingly rampant in this country and is very difficult to stop. Corruption has occurred in all areas of governance, be it executive, legislative, or judicial. The continuous increase in corruption in Indonesia causes this crime to be included in the category of extraordinary crime or known as extraordinary crime. The consequences that occur when corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime are that it must be handled in extraordinary ways and even though it is normative, Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Corruption Law which allows for a death penalty for committing corruption in certain circumstances, Until now, since the AntiCorruption Law was passed, no perpetrator has been sentenced to the death penalty. Even for corruption committed during the pandemic, no one was sentenced to death. Thus, the problem in this research is how to reformulate the death penalty provisions in the criminal law policy of corruption in the future by using normative legal research (normative juridical) or prescriptive library law research.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. Buku

Andi Hamzah dan Sumagelipu, Pidana Mati di Masa Lalu, Kini, dan

Masa Depan, Jakarta: Ghalia, 1984.

Amir Syamsuddin. Integritas Penegak Hukum, Hakim, Jaksa, Polisi,

dan Pengacara, Jakarta: Kompas, 2008.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Kebijakan Reformulasi Ancaman Pidana Mati

Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Peraturan Perundang Undangan,

Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2013.

Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: PT Raja

Grafindo Persada, 2008.

M. Endriyo Susila et al., Buku Pedoman Penulisan Hukum,

Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,

Muhammad Hatta, Kejahatan Luar Biasa (Extra Ordinary Crime),

Aceh: Kampus Bukit Indah Lhokseumawe, Unimel Press,2019.

Monang Siahaan, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: PT.

Grasindo, 2016.

Nelvitia Purba dan Sri Sulistyawati, Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati:

Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia,

Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2015.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

Sry Satriya Tjatur Wisnu Sasangka, Gapura Bahasa Indonesia,

Yogyakarta: Elmatera Publising, 2012.

Soerjono Soerkanto dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif,

Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada., 2004.

B. Artikel Jurnal Cetak

Pomerleau, Claude. ” Reviewed Work: Atrocity, Punishment, AndInternational Law by Mark A. Drumbl”, Jurnal International on

World Peace Vol. 25, No. 2 Tahun 2008.

Drumbl, Mark A. “Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law”,

Chapter 1: Extraordinary Crime and Ordinary Punishment: An

Overview, Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pengembalian Aset

Kejahatan Korupsi, disampaikan pada Pidato Pengukuhan Guru

Besar pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada,

Yogyakarta,Universitas Gajah Mada, 2012.

T. M., Lubis.“Hukuman Mati Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”,

Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, Edisi No.2 Tahun 2009, hal.

Warih Anjari, “Penerapan Pidana Mati Terhadap Terpidana Kasus

Korupsi”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 49 No.4 Tahun 2020.

C. Website

Alamsyah, Wana., ” Kinerja Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2020”

diakses dari https://www.antikorupsi.org/, diakses pada 25

November 2021

CNN Indonesia "Ranking Indeks Korupsi Indonesia Merosot, Urutan 102

dari 180" diakses dari

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210128134510-12-

/ranking-indeks-korupsi-indonesia-merosot-urutan-102-

dari-180. pada tanggal 28 Januari 2021

Statistik Gratifikasi KPK,

https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/gratifikasi/109-statistik, diakses

pada 1 November 2021