ALASAN PEMAAF SEBAGAI DASAR MENGHAPUSKAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA

Merry Aprillyani

Abstract


The excuse for forgiveness is a reason that eliminates the perpetrator's guilt but his actions are still declared as an unlawful act. One of the things that can be a reason for forgiveness is if someone has a mental disorder, then he will be released from all lawsuits. However, in practice, not all narcotics criminals who are indicated to have mental disorders can apply forgiving reasons for themselves. The formulation of the problem that will be discussed in this study is how the reason for forgiveness is the basis for eliminating criminal liability in narcotics crimes? This study aims to examine and analyze the reasons for forgiveness as the basis for eliminating criminal liability in narcotics crimes. This research is a normative legal research with analytical descriptive nature and the data is collected by using literature study technique. This study uses a law approach and a case approach and uses a qualitative juridical analysis method. The results of this study are not all mental disorders can be the reason for the implementation of excuses. To ensure the defendant's mental condition, it is necessary to carry out a mental health examination by a psychiatric specialist based on Permenkes No. 77/2015. From the examination process, results will be obtained regarding the type of mental disorder of the defendant, the nature of the mental disorder of the defendant, the role/responsibility of the mental disorder of the defendant for the crime he committed, and the ability to be responsible for the defendant which is then summarized in a Psychiatric Visum et Repertum to be the main consideration for the judge. in enforcing excuses. In addition to considering the VeRP, other evidence such as witness statements will also be considered by the judge to build confidence in him.

Keywords


excuses for forgiveness; mental disorders; narcotics crime

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Buku

Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan

Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar

Grafika, 2007.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Kanter, E.Y. dan S.R. Sianturi. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan

Penerapannya. Jakarta: Alumni AHM-PTHM, 1982.

T, Prasadio. Gangguan Psikiatrik pada Anak-anak dengan Retardasi Mental. Surabaya:

Universitas Airlangga, 1976.

Organization, World Health. Primary Prevention of Mental Neurological and

Psychosocial Disorders. Geneva: WHO, 1998.

Maslim, Rusdi. Buku Saku Diagnosa Gangguan Jiwa Rujukan Ringkas dari PPDGJ-III.

Jakarta: Bagian Kedokteran FK-Unika Atmajaya, 2001.

Semium, Yustinus. Kesehatan Mental 3. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2006.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S.. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Remmelink, Jan. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

Marpaung, Ledeng. Unsur-Unsur Perbuatan yang Dapat Dihukum (delik). Cetakan ke1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991.

Utrecht, E.. Hukum Pidana I. Bandung: Penerbitan Universitas, 1967.

Pariaman, H. Hasan Basri Saanin Dt. Tan. Psikiater dan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Fajar

Agung, 1986.

B. Artikel Jurnal Cetak

Jennings, Floyd L.. “The Insanity Srandard.” Open Access Journal of Forensic

Psychology, 2013




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17955

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Hukum Adigama is indexed by:

   

 

-----

Alamat:

Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Tarumanagara

Ruang Jurnal, Gedung M, Lantai 2, Kampus 1

Jl. S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat - 11440

[T] (+6221) 5671748, 5604477

[E] era.hukum.mahasiswa@fh.untar.ac.id

----- 

E-ISSN 2655-7347

P-ISSN 2747-0873

-----

Web Analytics Jurnal Hukum Adigama Stats

Flag Counter