FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI TRADING IN INFLUENCE SEBAGAI KORUPSI DI INDONESIA

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 15, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17954
Keywords:
Trading in Influence Corruption UNCAC

Main Article Content

Sheryn Lawrencya
Ade Adhari

Abstract

Trading Influence acts are non-mandatory offenses regulated in UNCAC and ratified by Law Number 7 of 2006 concerning UNCAC Ratification. Based on the cases that have occurred in Indonesia, the act of Trading Influence has actually developed in Indonesia, but is considered as “bribery”. Indonesia has not been able to ensnare the perpetrators of influence trading under the Corruption Law because there are no rules that regulate it, so there is legal uncertainty and a legal vacuum. This is due to the many factors that hinder the formulation of trading in influence policies in Indonesia. The research method used is normative using library materials or document studies for library research. This study looks back at what are the causes so that it is immediately regulated in Indonesia to be able to distinguish between bribery and the act of trading in influence in the context of overcoming corruption in Indonesia.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Section
Articles

This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

A. Buku

Amin, Rahman. Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata. Sleman:

Deepulish, 2020.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep

KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.

Arikunto, Surahsimi. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rieneka

Cipta, 2002.

Bachtiar. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Pamulang: UNPAM Press, 2019.

Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di

Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP, 2005.

Kenedi, H. John. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) dalam Sistem Penegakan

Hukum di Indoneia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Priyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Surabaya: Zifatama Publishing, 2016.

Soedarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1981.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Ke-3. Jakarta: Universitas

Indonesia, 1984.

Sunggono, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada,

Watch, Indonesia Corruption. Kajian Implementasi Aturan Trading in Influence Dalam

Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2014.

B. Artikel Jurnal Online

Siswanto, Dadang. “Korupsi Sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisir”.

Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum. Volume 42, Nomor 1 (Januari 2013): 123-

Diakses tanggal 22 Oktober 2021. doi:

https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/5868/9903

Sembiring, Imentari Siin. “Urgensi Perumusan Perbuatan Memperdagangkan Pengaruh

sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Jurnal Hukum. Volume 3, Nomor 1 (Juli

: 59-84. Diakses tanggal 20 Oktober 2021. doi:

https://ujh.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/105/36

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. “United Nations Convention Against Corruption dalam Sistem

Hukum Indonesia”. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. Volume 31, Nomor 1 (Februari

: 112-125. Diakses tanggal 20 Oktober 2021. doi:

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.43968

Garnasih, Yenti. “Paradigma Baru dalam Pengaturan Anti Korupsi di Indonesia

dikaitkan dengan UNCAC 2003”. Jurnal Hukum Prioris. Volume 2, Nomor 3

(September 2009): 161-174. Diakses tanggal 25 Oktober 2021. doi:

https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/334

Nurhardianto, Fajar. “Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia”. Jurnal TAPIs.

Volume 11, Nomor 1 (Juni 2015): 37. Diaskes tanggal 26 Oktober 2021. doi:

http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/TAPIs/article/view/840/723