PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN INFLUENCER DALAM PEMBUATAN KONTEN PENGIKLANAN MELALUI SOCIAL MEDIA YANG MENGANDUNG INFORMASI PALSU (CONTOH KASUS KARTIKA PUTRI DAN DR. RICHARD LEE).

Main Article Content

Sergio Solaiman
Mariske Myeke Tampi

Abstract

We often encounter advertising practices through social media, this can be in the form of a practice we know as endorsement, but it is not uncommon that endorsements made by influencers contain false information. Of these cases, why are the influencers who assist the endorsement process rarely penalized while they participate in the process of advertising a product that harms consumers? The author examines the problem by using normative research methods. The research data shows that there are weak clauses in the UUPK that do not clearly define who is meant by advertising business actors, and what form of concrete responsibility is the advertising business actors. This weakness results in most endorsements containing false information leaving the influencers and endorsers free from sanctions and only focusing on the producers of the goods or services. As in the example of the case when endorser promoting beauty and cosmetic products to her followers on Instagram, but further investigation has proven that the product contains toxic and dangerous ingredients and requires a doctor's prescription to be able to use it. The results of this study indicate the need for an element of caution for endorsers and influencers against endorsement offers that do not have a license, both in their products and businesses, by doing so they will not be penalized. It is recommended that further regulation of advertising content on social media is needed so that there is differentiation of responsibilities of endorsers and influencers according to their actions and caution.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. Buku

Adinugroho, Susanti. Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Ditinjau Dari

Hukum Acara Serta Kendala dan Implementasinya, (Jakarta: Prenada

Media Group, 2008).

Agustina, Rosa. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, (Jakarta : Program Pascasarjana

FH UI, 2003).

Belch, George E., dan Michael A. Belch. Advertising and Promotion : An

Integrated Marketing Communication Perspective Sixth Edition. (New

York : Mc Graw Hill, 2003).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta : Kencana Prenada

Media Group, 2006).

Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo,

.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia, (Bandung: Citra

Aditya Bakti, 2010).

Shidarta. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT Grasindo,

.

Stanton, William J. Fundamentals of Marketing, 8th Edition. (New York : Mc

Graw Hill,1984).

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Staatsblad Nomor 23

Tahun 1847).

________. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan

Konsumen, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor

dan Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3821).

________. Peraturan Kepala Badan Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan Republik

Indonesia Nomor HK.00.05.42.1018 Tentang Bahan Kosmetik.

________. Surat Edaran BPOM Nomor PO.02.05.43.4496 Tentang Produk

Kosmetik Yang Mengandung Hidrokinon.

C. Jurnal Dan Artikel Ilmiah

Hartati, Ambaryati. Endorsement Sebagai Strategi Pemasaran Ditinjau Dari

Etika Bisnis Islam. (Lampung : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN)

Metro.2019).

Muzdalifa. “Strategi Komunikasi Pemasaran Big Bananas di Makassar

Melalui Endorse Selebgram”, (Makassar : Fakultas Dakwah dan

Komunikasi UIN Alauddin, 2019).

Simatupang, Shera Aulia. “Implementasi Prinsip Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam

Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di BPSK”, Dialogica Iuridica, Vol. 9

No.1 Tahun 2017