KEADILAN HUKUM DALAM MEMPERTIMBANGKAN POST TRAUMATIC SYNDROME DISORDER PADA PENJATUHAN PIDANA DALAM PENGADILAN TINGGI NOMOR 9/Pid.SusAnak//2020/PT DKI

Main Article Content

Syarah Alfiatin
Hery Firmansyah

Abstract

As the law states, Indonesia has the purpose of protecting the entire Indonesian nation and all Indonesian bloodshed. It is clearly stated in the constitution of the republic of Indonesia that those who face legal issues, especially children, must get their fundamental rights while serving a sentence. In imposing criminal sanctions on children also, the judge must pay attention to children’s needs and rights. Besides, parents and state social workers must have a role ensuring the protection of the children. It becomes more crucial when the children have a mental disorder and must get continuous treatment as stipulated by law. In the children’s perspective, beyond the fact that whether the children act as perpetrators or victims, the children are still the victim. They can be the victim of parental neglect, misleading parenting, and even the lack of parental supervision. All these situations lead the children to commit law – violating acts. Children with Post Traumatic Syndrome Disorder must get a sense of security either from both parents or the state. The children must get social rehabilitation as special treatment until they recover from their mental disorder.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. Buku

Ansori dan Abdul Gofur. Filsafat Hukum Sejarah Aliran dan Pemaknaan.

(Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2006).

Friederich, Carl Joachim. Filsafat Hukum: Perspektif Historis. (Bandung:

Nuansa dan Busamedis, 2004).

Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem

Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia. (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama,

.

Muhammad, Joni dan Zul Chaina Z. Tanamas. Aspek Perlindungan

Hukum Perlindungan Anak dalam Perspektif Konvensi Hak Anak.

(Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999).

Sambas, Nandang. Dan Ade Mahmud. Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan

Asas – asas dalam RKUHP. (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2019)

B. Jurnal

Kholid, Imam. Dan Ahmad Babiej. “Pertimbangan Hakim dalam

Memutus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak di

Baah Umur (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 128/Pid.Sus/2013/PTY)”. Vol.

No 1. Tahun 2014.

Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana. Dkk. “Fungsionalisasi Pasal 44 KUHP dalam

Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Suatu Re - orientasi dan Re

– evaluasi Menuju Reformulasi)”. Vej. Vol 5 No 2.

Tyas, Srikandi Wahyuningsih dan Diana Lukitasari.

“Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penderita Gangguan Bipolar (Studi

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor 190/Pid.B/2013/PN.

Mlg)”. Recidive. Vol 7 No 2. Tahun 2013.

Yanse, Oktaliza. “Analisis Yuridis Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana

Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana yang Dilakukan Anak dibawah

Umur”. Tahun 2012.

C. Skripsi

Ahmad, Ema Siti Huzaimah. Skripsi: Kepastian Hukum Penanganan

Perkara Terhadap Pelaku yang Mengalami Gangguan Jiwa.

(Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran, 2016.)

D. Putusan

Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor 9/Pid.Sus-Anak//2020/PT. DKI

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.

Jkt.Pst

. Internet

Arief, Abdillah. Eksibisionis: Mental Disorder yang Tidak Bisa

Dipidana?. http://panjiinstitute.com. 16 Juni 2021.