ANALISIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENJAMIN PERORANGAN YANG MELEPASKAN HAK ISTIMEWA DAN DIMOHONKAN DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) (STUDI PUTUSAN: Nomor 141/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga Jkt.Pst)

Main Article Content

Reny Agustini
ariawan ariawan

Abstract

In this era of globalization more and more people are plunging into the field of business. In his decision to dive into the field of business, not a few people are willing to borrow credit for the sake of business continuity. In the case of this Lender the Bank must receive a guarantee first to guarantee the repayment of the debt. The current guarantee is not enough just in the form of material guarantees but often requested third-party guarantees. In this case, it is a Personal Guarantee. In the event of a Guarantee, the Creditor will ask the Guarantor to waive its privileges in a special agreement between the Creditor and the Guarantor. This resulted in his position. If many debtors do not pay their debts, lancer will request Postponement in debt repayment obligations. But nowadays not only debtors are requested but guarantors are also requested. This is a very dilemma and until now there is no Legal Certainty on the matter of guarantors requested for Postponement in debt repayment obligations. This is due to the difference in the interpretation of the waiver of privileges and the existence of special provisions in the Bankruptcy Law and Postponement in debt repayment obligations that do not govern clearly and specifically. So this matter becomes uncertain.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. Buku

Deng Naja, H.R. Hukum Kredit dan Bank Garansi. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya

Bakti.2005.

Fuady,Munir. Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: Erlangga.2013.

Soedewi Masjchun Sofwan, Sri. Himpunan Karya tentang Hukum

Jaminan.Yogyakarta: Liberty Offset.1982.

Sutedi,Adrian. Hukum Kepailitan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. 2009.

Mahmud, Peter.Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Kencana. 2008.

Untung, H. Budi. Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Andi. 2000.

Sunarmi. Hukum Kepailitan.Medan: USU Press. 2009.

Adi Nugroho,Susanti. Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia: Dalam Teori dan

Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Muljadi, Kartini dan Gunawan Widjaja. Pedoman Menangani Perkara

Kepailitan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2003.

B. Jurnal Online

Pangastuti,Luky. “Pertanggung Jawaban Pihak Personal Guarantee Yang

Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Repertorium. Volume II No. 2 (Juli -

Desember 2015):147. Diakses tanggal 30 May 2021.

Claudia,Anjani dan Teddy Anggoro.“Kedudukan Personal Guarantor yang

telah melepaskan Hak Istimewanya dalam perkara Kepailitan (Studi

Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 868K/Pdt.Sus/2010).Jurnal

FH UI, (2014):13. Diakses tanggal 30 May 2021.

Reny Agustini & Ariawan

ANALISIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENJAMIN PERORANGAN YANG

MELEPASKAN HAK ISTIMEWA DAN DIMOHONKAN DALAM PENUNDAAN

KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) (STUDI PUTUSAN:

NOMOR 141/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2020/PN.NIAGA JKT.PST)

Volume 4 Nomor 2, Desember 2021

E-ISSN: 2655-7347 | P-ISSN: 2747-0873

Tata,Wijayanta. “Asas Kepastian Hukum,Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam

Kaitannya dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga”.Jurnal

Dinamika Hukum. Vol.14,No.2.(2014):219. Diakses tanggal 30 May

C. Website

Qur'ani, Hmalatul. “Pandangan Ahli Soal Penarikan Guarantor Sebagai

Termohon PKPU”.

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5cb8637c0a35d/pandangan-ahlisoal-penarikan-guarantor-sebagai-termohon-pkpu/. Diakses tanggal 25 May