ANALISIS KEKUATAN HUKUM ATAS PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DENGAN METODE CIRCULAR RESOLUTION PADA PERSEROAN TERBATAS

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 7, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i1.12035
Keywords:
Limited Liability Company GMS Circular Resolution.

Main Article Content

Slivia Cendana
Eva Fortuna
Devina Trianti
Andryawan Andryawan

Abstract

One of the aims and objectives of the Limited Liability Company is to make decisions for the sustainability of the Company. This decision making is carried out by shareholders in the organs of a limited liability company, namely the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), generally this decision making is carried out in a meeting that has been previously scheduled as stated in the Articles of Association of a Limited Liability Company. However, there are other ways of decision making in Limited Liability Companies which are carried out by shareholders besides the GMS as regulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 Article 91 concerning Limited Liability Companies, which are known as circular resolutions. This Circular Resolution is a mechanism provided by law for the convenience of shareholders. This study aims to determine the legal power of decision making and to determine the effectiveness of decision making by using the circular resolution method in Limited Liability Companies. This research method is normative research by examining the positive rule of law in Indonesia and literature studies. The results of this study indicate that decisions made by Circular Resolution have binding legal force as well as decisions made by the GMS by calling beforehand. This Circular Resolution can be carried out as a substitute for the conventional GMS as stated in the Articles of Association of the Company. The circular resolution does not have to mandatorily written on the notarial deed to prove its legal legitimacy, but there are provisions regarding several decisions that must be stated on the notarial deed. Circular resolution decisions are effective because these decisions are generally made to the convenienxe of limited liability companies which are closed, which the closed limited liability company only consists of a few shareholders so obtaining a signature as a form of validity of the decision is easier compared to publicly listed companies.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Section
Articles

This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Buku

Harahap, M Yahya. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Wahyuni, Grace. Keabsahan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah. Depok: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, 2013.

Jurnal Online

Faisal, Fadlyna Ulfa, Abdullah Marlang, dan Oky Deviany, "Pelaksanaan Circular Resolution Pada Perseroan Terbatas." Universitas Hasanuddin.

Santoso, Johari. "Perseroan Terbatas sebagai Institusi Kegiatan Ekonomi yang Demokratis." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Volume 7, Nomor 15 (Desember 2000): 194-204, diakses tanggal 5 Mei 2021, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss15.art15

Isfardiyana, Siti Hapsah. "Business Judgement Rule Oleh Direksi Perseroan." Jurnal Panorama Hukum, Volume 2, Nomor 1 (Juni 2017): 1-20, diakses tanggal 5 Mei 2021, doi: 10.21067/jph.v2i1.1752

Wibisono, Okky Maharani. "Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keputusan Circular Resolution Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Dalam Pemberhentian Direksi." Perspektif, Volume 23, Nomor 3 (September 2018): 133-141, diakses tanggal 6 Mei 2021, doi: 10.30742/perspektif.v23i3.640

Yuliadi, Anang, et. al. "Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Yang Didasarkan Pada Notulen Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa Yang Cacat Hukum (Studi Putusan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Provinsi DKI Jakarta Nomor 12/PTS/Mj. PWN. Prov. DKIJakarta/XI/2018)." Indonesian Notary, Volume 1, Nomor 003 (2019). diakses tanggal 6 Mei 2021, doi: 2684-7310

Pahlefi. “Eksistensi RUPS sebagai Organ Perseroan Terkait Dengan Pasal 91 Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 7, Nomor 2 (Oktober 2016), diakses tanggal 6 Mei 2021.

Yuwono, Muhammad Yusron. "Perkembangan Kewenangan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia." NOTARIUS, Volume 8, Nomor 2 (September 2015): 207-235, diakses tanggal 7 Mei 2021, doi: 10.14710/nts.v8i2.10265

Oktarina, Rini, Muhammad Syaifuddin, dan Achmad Syarifudin. "Pengaturan Hukum Persetujuan Sirkuler lintas Negara Pemegang Saham PT PMA Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Notarial." Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, Volume 8, Nomor 2 (November 2019): 158-170, diakses tanggal 7 Mei 2021, doi: 10.28946/rpt.v%vi%i.392

Lubis, Tapi Masniari, Pieter E Latumenten, dan Widodo Suryadono. "Keputusan Pemegang Saham Di Luar Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Sebagai Dokumen Luar Negeri (Analisa Terhadap Dokumen Hukum PT X)." Universitas Indonesia (2019).

Makalah/ Paper/ Orasi Ilmiah

Cenggana, Livia. “Pengambilan Keputusan Dengan Metode Circular Resolution Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Sebagai Badan Hukum.” Makalah. Tidak Diterbitkan. Fakultas Hukum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmay Jaya Yogyakarta, 2016.

Sinaga, Surayya Azzuhra. “Keabsahan Circular Resolution Yang Diselenggarakan Pemegang Saham Tanpa Sepengetahuan Direksi Dalam Perseroan Terbatas.” Skripsi. Tidak Diterbitkan. Fakultas Hukum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2017.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPer);

Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas

Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Luar Negeri No. 09/A/KP/XII/2006/01 perihal Panduan Umum Tata Cara Hubungan dan Kerjasama Luar Negeri Oleh Pemerintah Daerah.

Website

Devita, Irma. “Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham” https://irmadevita.com/2007/rapat-umum-pemegang-saham-perseroan/. Diakses tanggal 6 Mei 2021.