UPAYA YURIDIS MEMPERKECIL DISPARITAS PUTUSAN

Kelly Kelly

Abstract


A difference in the imposition of punishment on a decision is something that has happened for a long time, this cannot be eliminated completely. The difference in the imposition of penalties for cases of similar or equal seriousness and then without clear reasons is called disparity. Therefore, the disparity in the judges' decisions can give the convict and the outside community a sense of being unfair. Various kinds of theories about justice from several experts spread in society. Although regarding justice it cannot be answered with the provisions of the measure to determine fair or not, because true justice belongs to God. So that the disparity decision results in an unsatisfactory decision and becomes a relative formula. Until justice is submitted to the judge who is considered to be able to give a decision in accordance with the sense of justice that lives in society. The formulation of the problem is how to reduce the disparity in criminal decisions. The research method used is normative. By using data collection techniques, namely literature study and also conducting interviews. Then the results of this study indicate that the disparity in verdicts cannot be eliminated altogether, but efforts can be made to minimize the disparity in criminal decisions.

Keywords


Criminal imposition ; Judge’s decision ; Disparity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Asrun, A. Muhammad. Krisis Peradilan: Mahkamah Agung di Bawah Suharto. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2004.

Fachmi. Kepastian Hukum Mengenai Putusan Batal Demi Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Ghalia Indonesia Publishing, 2011.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogjakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2015.

Kartanegara, Satochid. Hukum Pidana Bagian Satu. Jakarta: Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, 1998.

Muladi, dan Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1984.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Prakoso, Djoko dan Nurwachid. Studi Tentang Pendapat-Pendapat Mengenai Efektivitas Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dewasa Ini. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia,1984.

Ujan, Andre Atta. Filsafat Hukum, Membangun Hukum, Membela Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Filsafat, Kanisius, 2009.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Indonesia. Undang-Undang No 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Artikel Jurnal Online

Ardiansyah, Irfan. “Pengaruh Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Respublica, Vol 17 No. 1 Tahun 2017.

Nimerodi, Gulo dan Ade Kurniawan Muharram. “Disparitas Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 47 No. 3 Juli Tahun 2018.

Wijayanta Tata dan Hery Firmansyah. “Perbedaan Pendapat Dalam Putusan-Putusan Di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Dan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman”, Mimbar Hukum, Vol 23 No. 1 Tahun 2011.

HM. Siregar. “Analisis Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perjudian”, Pranata Hukum, Vol 9 No. 1 Tahun 2014

Kutipan Makalah/Paper/Orasi Ilmiah

Fitri, Insani. “Tinjauan Yuridis Disparitas Putusan Narkoba (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo)”. Skripsi, Surakarta: FH UMS, 2018.

Hamka, Wahyuni. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa)”, Skripsi, Makassar: FH UIN Alauddin, 2018.

Rahman, Ardillah. “Implementasi Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Kasus Tahun 2010-2012 di Kabupaten Wajo)”, Skripsi, Makasar: FH Unhas, 2013.

Rohmatin, Erni Ebi. “Ratio Decidendi hakim Pengadilan Agama Malang Dalam Putusan No. 2303/Pdt.G/2015/PA Mlg Tentang Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan”, Skripsi, Malang: FH UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2018




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10607

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Hukum Adigama is indexed by:

   

 

-----

Alamat:

Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Tarumanagara

Ruang Jurnal, Gedung M, Lantai 2, Kampus 1

Jl. S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat - 11440

[T] (+6221) 5671748, 5604477

[E] era.hukum.mahasiswa@fh.untar.ac.id

----- 

E-ISSN 2655-7347

P-ISSN 2747-0873

-----

Web Analytics Jurnal Hukum Adigama Stats

Flag Counter