ANALISIS PENERAPAN PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL MEREK TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL DI INDONESIA

Main Article Content

Sabrina Aurellia
Christine S.T. Kansil

Abstract

There are several viewpoints in determine a mark is a well-known trademark. Viewpoints gives confusion for the authorities in determining a well-known trademark. Well-known trademark as one of intellectual property rights has the right to be protected. Protection needs legal certainty. In order to provide legal certainty, the World Intellectual Property Organization initiates to establish international agreement, such as Paris Convention for the Protection of IndustriaI Property, The Agreement on Trade-ReIated Aspects of InteIIectual Property Rights 1995, and the Trademark Law Treaty. Indonesia as a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization ratifies the international agreements. The international agreement also became the basis of Indonesia’s intellectual property law, including well-known trademarks. The legal certainty in Indonesia for well-known marks can only be achieved with regulations and verdicts. Well-known mark is regulated in Act Number 20 Year 2016 and the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 67 Year 2016. In fact, Indonesia’s regulations and verdict are not enough to hold off well-known mark cases. One of the cases is Sentence Number 04/Pdt. Sus.-Merek/2019/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst. AUTUMNPAPER LIMITED as the owner of the brand “ALEXANDER MCQUEEN” filed a lawsuit in 2019 to determine that “ALEXANDER MCQUEEN” is a well-known trademark in Indonesia. AUTUMNPAPER LIMITED also filed a lawsuit to cancel the registration of “MC QUEEN” in Indonesia based on Indonesia’s Act and Regulations.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Buku

Atsar, AbduI. MengenaI Lebih Dekat Hukum Hak Kekayaan IntelektuaI.

Yogyakarta:DeepubIish, 2018.

Diatha, I Made. MetodoIogi PeneIitian Hukum. Jakarta:Kencana, 2017.

Djumhana, Muhammad dan R DjubaediIIah. Hak MiIik InteIektual

Sejarah, Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Bandung:Citra

Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Gunawati, Anne. PerIindungan Merek TerkenaI Barang dan Jasa Tidak

Sejenis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Jakarta:AIumni, 2015.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

Soekardono, R. Hukum Dagang Indonesia. Jakarta:Soeroengan, 1967.

Surahno, et al. Hak Kekayaan InteIektual. (Jakarta:Karunika

Universitas Terbuka, 2007.

Jurnal

AIfons, Maria. “ImpIementasi Hak Kekayaan InteIektual daIam

Perspektif Negara Hukum”. JurnaI Legislasi Indonesia. Vol. 14

No. 23 Tahun 2017.

NurmaIasari, Vitri. “Optimalisasi PNBP MeIaIui PeIayanan OnIine”.

BuIetin Inti PNBP. Edisi 2 September Tahun 2020.

Nurhalimah, Siti. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia”, Jurnal

Adalah. Vol. 1 No. 6C Tahun 2017.

Syafrinaldi. “Sejarah dan Teori Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan

Intelektual”. Jurnal Al-Mawarid. Edisi IX Tahun 2003.

Situs

Direktori Putusan MA RI. “Putusan Mahkamah Agung Merek”.

www.putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id. 18 Oktober 2020.