PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PENERIMA MANFAAT ASURANSI PERTANGGUNGAN JIWA ATAS POLIS YANG DINYATAKAN LAPSE SECARA SEPIHAK PASCA DIAJUKAN KLAIM (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 628 PDT.G/2019/PN.JKT.BRT)

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 12, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10579
Keywords:
Consumer Protection Insurance Beneficiaries Lapse Policy.

Main Article Content

Ruth Yaniasni Leonita
Mariske Myeke Tampi

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the form of legal protection for consumers who receive life insurance benefits for policies declared unilaterally lapse after the claim is submitted and from the perspective of the insurance company PT. Panin Dai-Ichi Life for providing information on policy status that was declared lapse. The results of the study showed that the form of legal protection for insurance consumers in this case was preventive and repressive protection. Preventive through mediation to BMAI, and repressive through court lawsuits. In his lawsuit, the judge has won the consumer, but there is an appeal so that consumers have not received legal protection for compensation. In addition, external protection through the Consumer Protection Act and internal protection through insurance policies. However, the Consumer Law was unable to ensnare PT. Panin Dai-Ichi  Life for violating Article 4 letter c and Article 7 letter b has no legal sanction. Likewise, internal protection can be seen from the insurance policy if the lawsuit for violating Article 18 Paragraph (1) letter f regarding standard clauses is proven proven, then the business actor based on Article 62 Paragraph (1) may be subject to imprisonment and fines. Thus it can be concluded that through external protection the Consumer Protection Act, in this case it has not been able to protect consumers.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Section
Articles

This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Buku

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pembangunan Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Lustrum XI Fakultas Hukum UGM, 2006).

El-Muhtaj, Majda. Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2007).

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, (Jakarta: Peradaban, 2007).

Isnaeni, Moch. Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. (Surabaya: PT. Revka Petra Media, 2016).

Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2002).

Kelsen, Hans. Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara. (Bandung: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006).

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000).

Rokhmad, Abu. Hukum Progresif Pemikiran Satjipto Rahardjo dalam Perspektif Teori Maslahah. Cetakan ke-1. (Semarang: Program Pascasarjana IAIN Walisongo dan Pustaka Rizky Putra, 2014).

Rosmawati. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Cetakan ke-1. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2018).

Tim Penulis Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya. Spirit Hukum (A Brilliant Idea of ??The Champ). Cetakan Pertama. (Malang: UP Press, 2010).

Peraturan.Perundang-Undang

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

________. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1999 Nomor 42, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3821).

________. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1992 tentang Perasuransian, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1992 Nomor 13; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3467).

________. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 337, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5618).

________. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor: 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan.

________. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 23/POJK.05/2015 Tahun 2015 tentang Produk Asuransi dan Pemasaran Produk Asuransi.

________. Keputusan RAT AAJI No. 03/AAJI/2012 tentang Standar Praktik dan Kode Etik Tenaga Pemasar Asuransi Jiwa.