ANALISIS YURIDIS PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN JAKSA SEBAGAI PENUNTUT UMUM DAN PENYIDIK DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA

Marselly Sealtiel, Hery Firmansyah

Abstract


The handling of corruption crimes committed by the prosecutor's office as investigators and public prosecutors has caused many problems, both internally and externally, the prosecutor's office. The Attorney General's Office carries out its duties and powers based on Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Public Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia. The problem to be discussed in this research is how the process of carrying out investigations and prosecutions in the handling of corruption crimes committed by the prosecutor's office based on laws and whether it creates a conflict of interest when it is carried out by the same prosecutor in different work functions. This study uses a normative research method which is sourced from secondary data from a literature study with a statutory approach. The results of the study indicate that in the process of implementing the authority of investigation and prosecution by the prosecutor, it still causes problems because there is no renewal or adjustment (harmonization) between regulations. In practice, the prosecutor's office in carrying out investigations and prosecutions using the one-stop system is an efficiency in the case handling process and even the ease of coordinating under one roof. Limited human resources within the prosecutor's office mean that there are personnel who carry out the work of investigating and prosecuting at the same time, even though structurally there is separation. So that in practice it creates a conflict of interest that impacts objectivity and personnel independence.



Keywords


the authority of the prosecutor ; investigation ; prosecution ; corruption.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Effendy, Marwan. Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Referensi, 2012.

Fajar, Mukti dan Yulianto Ahmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Hamzah, Andi. Korupsi di Indonesia: Masalah Dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta:

Sinar Grafika, 1991.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Sinar

Grafika, 2001.

Kristiana, Yudi. Independensi kejaksaan Dalam Penyidikan Korupsi. Bandung:PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

Sadjijono, Hukum antara Sollen dan Sein. Surabaya: UBHARA Press &

LaksBang Pressindo, 2017.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Indonesia, Undang Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun

Nomor 76, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia

Nomor 3209).

______. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan

Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun

Nomor: 140, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia

Nomor: 3874).

______. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik

Indonesia. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor

Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4401).

Artikel Jurnal Online

Hutahaean, Armunanto dan Erlyn Indarti, “Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem

Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.

Volume 16 Nomor 1 – Maret 2019. Diakses tanggal 10 November 2020.

Website

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. “Korupsi”, https://kbbi.web.id/korupsi. Diakses

tanggal 21 Desember 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10570

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Hukum Adigama is indexed by:

   

 

-----

Alamat:

Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Tarumanagara

Ruang Jurnal, Gedung M, Lantai 2, Kampus 1

Jl. S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat - 11440

[T] (+6221) 5671748, 5604477

[E] era.hukum.mahasiswa@fh.untar.ac.id

----- 

E-ISSN 2655-7347

P-ISSN 2747-0873

-----

Web Analytics Jurnal Hukum Adigama Stats

Flag Counter