PENERAPAN METODE CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) PADA PENJADWALAN REPARASI KAPAL PATROLI XVI 2012
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Ship repair work at shipyard facilities at the Ship Repair Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Pattimura University has not implemented project scheduling methods to optimize performance. Determining the time and scheduling of ship repair work is still done based on experience alone. As a result, time and cost inefficiencies occur which result in low performance, making it difficult for the docking and shipping industry to develop and contribute to the development of the maritime sector. This research aims to optimize the 2012 XVI Patrol Ship repair schedule. The method used in this research is the Critical Path Method (CPM). The object of the research is Patrol Ship XVI 2012. The research results show that the repair work process in existing conditions contains 24 activities and 21 routes which require 50.25 hours of work time. Rescheduling with CPM produces a critical path with 10 activities and 9 paths that require a processing time of 22.5 hours, or there is an efficiency of 44%. These results prove that CPM has succeeded in optimizing ship repair work time. These findings are useful for the Ship Repair Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Pattimura University to optimize performance to support the development of Indonesia's maritime sector.
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
H. Manurung, “Impact of Joko “Jokowi” Widodo Leaderships on Indonesia’s World Maritime Axis,” in Proceeding Konvensi Nasional AIHII V, 2014.
M. Yani dan I. Montratama, “Indonesia Sebagai Poros Maritim Dunia: Suatu Tinjauan Geopolitik,” Jurnal Pertahanan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 25–51, 2015.
J.S.T. Hutapea, I.P. Mulyatno, dan P. Manik, “Studi Penjadwalan Ulang Pekerjaan Reparasi Kapal MV. Awu dengan Network Diagram dan Critical Path Method (CPM),” Jurnal Teknik Perkapalan, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 555–562, 2020.
S. Howick, F. Ackermann, C. Eden, dan T. Williams, “Understanding The Causes and Consequences of Disruption and Delay in Complex Projects: How System Dynamics Can Help,” 2009.
D. Lock, Manajemen Proyek, Edisi Ketiga, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1987.
P. Napitupulu, dan Y. Lubis, “Perencanaan Durasi Waktu Pembangunan Rumah Tipe
,” 2022.
Badri, Dasar-Dasar Network Planning, Jakarta: PT. Rika Cipta, 1997.
M.R.M. Istiqomah, I.P. Mulyatno, S.J. Sisworo, E.S. Hadi, Kiryanto dan O. Mursid,
“Penjadwalan Ulang Kapal Reparasi TB. Patra Tunda 3001 dengan Metode Jalur
Kritis,” Jurnal Teknologi Perikanan dan Kelautan, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2021.
A. bin M.S.A. Muhammad, “Analisa Perhitungan Pekerjaan Reparasi Kapal dengan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM),” SPECTA Journal of Technology, vol. 4, no. 1,
pp. 84–91, 2020.
A.C. Armela, W. Amiruddin, dan E.S. Hadi, “Implementasi Project Evaluation and
Review Technique (PERT) pada Penjadwalan Reparasi Kapal KMP Royal
Nusantara,” Jurnal Teknik Perkapalan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 68–76, 2022.
L. Oktaviana, dan I. Baroroh, “Comparative Analysis of CPM, PDM and PERT Methods in Ship Repair Scheduling Planning KN. RB 309 Ternate 01,” Jurnal
Berkala Sainstek, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 162–174, 2022.
M.I. Nudin, dan K. Abdullah, “Penjadwalan Reparasi Tug Boat Menggunakan Metode CPM dan PDM,” Jurnal Jalasena, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 2023.
A.S. Muhamad, dan M. Basuki, “Analisis Perbandingan Penjadwalan Proyek dengan Critical Path Method (CPM) dan Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) pada Reparasi Kapal BG. KFT 8005,” Proseding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Industri Berkelanjutan II (SENASTITAN II), 2022.
W. Firstditama, B. Ma’ruf, I.K. Suastika, “Perencanaan Penjadwalan Reparasi Kapal Ferry dengan Menggunakan Metode FLASH,” Jurnal Wave, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018.
Y. Farida dan L.P. Anenda, “Network Planning Analysis on Road Construction Projects by CV. X Using Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) – Critical Path Method (CPM) and Crashing Method,” International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 377–390, 2022.
A. Soni, C.R. Kumar, dan A. Shrivastava, “Construction Projects Risk Assessment Based on PERT, CPM, and Project Management,” Advances and Applications in Mathematical Sciences, vol. 21, issue 9, pp. 5385–5395, 2022.
M. Simion, G. Vasile, C. Dinu, R. Scutariu, “CPM and PERT Techniques For Small- Scale R&D Projects,” in Proceedings Book International Symposium The Environment And The Industry SIMI with Fuzzy Logic Technique, pp. 166–174, 2019.
I. Soeharto, Manajemen Proyek Jilid 1 (dari Konseptual sampai Operasional), Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1999.