STUDI KASUS PENINGKATAN KUALITAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIX SIGMA DAN FMEA PADA PERUSAHAAN CARBON ROD BATERAI

Isi Artikel Utama

Yesaya Hansel Setiawan
Mohammad Agung Saryatmo
I Wayan Sukania

Abstrak

This research was conducted at PT. XYZ, a company that manufactures carbon rods, by 
applying the Six Sigma method using the DMAIC and FMEA approaches. The data is taken 
from production results during the period April 2024 to March 2025, which shows an average 
defect rate of 4.9%. The initial stage of the research begins with identifying critical to quality 
(CTQ), which is the need for high-quality carbon rod products that are able to meet customer 
demand consistently. Process mapping and quality performance calculation were carried out 
using the Six Sigma method, which resulted in a DPMO value of 6,997 and a sigma level of 
3.96. These results show that the production process needs to be improved. The main causes of 
defects are analyzed using a cause-and-effect diagram based on five types of defects, namely 
fracture, chipping, cracking, perforation, and tilted position, which are influenced by human 
factors, machines, methods, and working environments. through FMEA analysis, it was found 
that the causes of failure with the highest FRPN values were found, such as engine speed that 
was too high, cleanliness of machinery and other production equipment that is not observed or 
neglected, and errors in engine adjustment. Proposed improvements are carried out with a 
Kaizen approach through 5S and five M-checklists, and are implemented in the form of SOPs 
and checksheets. As a result, the defect rate was successfully reduced from 4.9% to 3.5%. 

Rincian Artikel

Bagian

Articles

Referensi

[1] Y.D.R. Montororing, M. Widyantoro, and A. Muhazir, “Production process

improvements to minimize product defects using DMAIC six sigma statistical tool

and FMEA at PT KAEF,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2157, no. 1, p.

012032, 2022.

[2] M. Bachtiar, S.S. Dahdah, and E. Ismiyah, “Analisis Pengendalian Kuaitas Produk

Pap Hanger Menggunakan Metode Six Sigma dan FMEA di PT. Ravana Jaya

Manyar Gresik,” JUSTI, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 609–618, Jul. 2020.

[3] A. Watt, Project Management, 2nd ed. Victoria, B.C.: BCcampus, 2014.

[4] A.T. Soemohadiwidjojo, Six sigma Metode Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan

Berbasis Statistik, Raih Asa Sukses, 2017.

[5] S. Aditya, A.J.M. Rambe, and K. Siregar, “Pengendalian Kualitas dengan

Menggunakan Diagram Kontrol MEWMA dan Pendekatan Lean Six Sigma di PT.

XYZ,” e-Jurnal Teknik Industri FT USU, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 35-46, 2013.

[6] D.B. Laney, “Improved Control Charts for Attributes,” Quality Engineering, vol. 14,

no. 4, pp. 531–537, 2002.

[7] S.H. Sakdiyah, N. Eltivia, and A. Afandi, “Root Cause Analysis Using Fishbone

Diagram: Company Management Decision Making,” Journal of Applied Business,

Taxation and Economics Research, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 566–576, 2022.

[8] M. Rinoza, J. Junaidi and F.A. Kurniawan, “Analisa RPN (risk priority number)

terhadap keandalan komponen mesin kompresor double screw menggunakan metode

FMEA di pabrik semen PT. XYZ,” Buletin Utama Teknik, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34-40,

2021.

[9] B. Sadeghi, M. Sodagari, H. Nematollahi, and H. Alikhani, “FMEA and AHP

Methods in Managing Environmental Risks in Landfills: A Case Study of Kahrizak,

Iran,” Environmental Energy and Economic Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2021.

[10] J. Puente, R. Pino, P. Priore, and D. de la Fuente, “A decision support system for

applying failure mode and effects analysis,” International Journal of Quality &

Reliability Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 137–150, 2002.