PENGARUH PEMERIKSAAN, SANKSI DAN KESADARAN WAJIB PAJAK TERHADAP KEPATUHAN WAJIB PAJAK DENGAN PEMODERASI PREFERENSI RISIKO
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 1
Download : 1
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of independent variables, namely tax audits, tax sanctions and taxpayer awareness on individual taxpayer compliance with risk preferences as a moderating variable. This study is a quantitative research with research data sourced from distributing questionnaires with a sample size of 100 respondents using the slovin method. The study indicates that only two hypotheses can be accepted, taxpayer awareness influences taxpayer compliance and risk preferences are able to moderate the relationship between tax audits and taxpayer compliance
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Ardyanto, Arif Angga dan Nanik Sri Utaminingsih. 2014. Pengaruh Sanksi Pajak Dan Pelayanan Aparat Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dengan Preferensi Risiko Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Accounting Analysis Journal. Vol. 3 No. 02 (2014).
Elsani, Karina dan Aries Tanno. (2023). Preferensi risiko dalam memoderasi pengaruh pemahaman peraturan perpajakan, sanksi pajak dan kesadaran wajib pajak terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Owner : Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi. Vol.7 No 2 (2023).
Ghozali, Imam. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21 Update PLS Regresi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. London, UK: Pearson New International Edition.
Ilhamsyah, Randi, Maria G Wi Endang dan Rizky Yudhi Dewantara. 2016. Pengaruh Pemahaman dan Pengetahuan WP tentang Peraturan Perpajakan, Kesadaran WP, Kualitas Pelayanan dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan WP Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Samsat Kota Malang). Jurnal Perpajakan Vol.8 No.1.
Kementerian Keuangan. Laporan Tahunan 2021 Kementerian Keuangan.
Kusuma, Kartika Candra. (2016). “Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Pajak, Pemahaman Peraturan Perpajakan Serta Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Dalam Membayar Pajak Tahun 2014 (Studi Kasus Pada Wajib Pajak Yang Terdaftar Di Kantor Pelayanan Penyuluhan Dan Konsultasi Perpajakan Wonosobo)”. Skripsi Yogyakarta.
Majdid, Suhirman. 2015. “The effect tax audit quality and service quality on tax reporting compliance (the cases of tax audit of Indonesia)”. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol. 6, No. 12: 131-134.
Mardiasmo. 2011. “Perpajakan Edisi Revisi”. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Mardiasmo. 2016. “Perpajakan Edisi Revisi”. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Mendra, N. P. Y. 2017. “Penerapan Sistem E-Filing, Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, dan Pemahaman Internet”.Jurnal Riset Akuntansi. Vol. 7, No. 2: 222-234.
Milgram, S. 1963. "Behavioral Study of Obedience".Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. Yale University.
Nurlaela, Siti. 2013. Pengaruh Pengetahuan dan Pemahaman, Kesadaran, Persepsi terhadap Kemauan Membayar Pajak Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi yang Melakukan Pekerjaan Bebas. Jurnal Paradigma Vol. 11 No. 02 Agustus 2013 – Januari 2014: 89-101.
Pranata. A dan Setiawan. 2014. Pengaruh Sanksi Perpajakan, Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kewajiban moral pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Ejournal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana.
Purnaditya R. R., Rohman A. 2015. “Pengaruh Pemahaman Pajak, Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Sanksi Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak“. Jurnal Diponegoro, Vol.4.
Rahayu, Siti Kurnia 2017, Perpajakan Konsep dan Aspek Formal, Bandung: Rekayasa Sains.
Rahmayanti, Nida Putri, Sutrisno T, Yeney Widya Prihatiningtias, 2020. Effect of tax penalties, tax audit, and taxpayers awareness on corporate taxpayers’ compliance moderated by compliance intentions. Research in Business & Social Science IJRBS VOL 9 NO 2 ISSN: 2147-4478 Available online at www.ssbfnet.com Journal homepage: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs.
Rita, J.D Atarwaman. (2020). Pengaruh kesadaran wajib pajak, sanksi pajak dan kualitas pelayanan pajak terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi. Jurnal Akuntansi,Vol 6 (1), 39–51.
Safri Nurmantu. 2013. Pengantar Perpajakan. Jakarta: Granit.
Suntono dan Andi Kartika. (2015). “Pengaruh Pemahaman Peraturan Pajak Dan Pelayanan Aparat Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dengan Preferensi Risiko sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Kasus pada UMKM yang Terdaftar Di KPP Pratama Demak)”. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Perbankan Vol. 4, No. 1.
Wahyuningsih, Tri. (2019). Analisis Dampak Pemahaman Peraturan Perpajakan, Kualitas Pelayanan Fiskus dan Sanksi Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi dengan Preferensi Risiko sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Sains, Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Vol 1 No 3: Maret 2019 https://doi.org/10.1234/jsam.v1i3.63.
Yanto, Alif Faruqi Febri, Rida Perwita Sari. 2021. Moderasi preferensi risiko pengaruh pemeriksaan pajak dan pelayanan fiskus terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Jurnal Proaksi. Vol. 8 No. 2 : 451-459.
Yanto, Alif Faruqi Febri, Soeparlan Pranoto, Dwi Suhartini. 2021.Taxpayer Compliance at KPP Pratama Surabaya Mulyorejo with risk preferencenas moderated variables. EAJ (Economic and Accounting Journal). Vol. 4 No. 1 : 48-58.