SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL DAN KOMPLEKSITAS TUGAS TERHADAP AUDIT JUDGEMENT DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT

Main Article Content

Fitri Yuliani
Sukrisno Agoes
MF Djeni Indrajati

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of professional skepticism and task complexity on audit judgment and its impact on audit quality. This research was conducted at KAP members of FAPM in Jakarta. The sample in this study was selected using a purposive sample method in order to obtain a total sample of 100 external auditors using a questionnaire. The research method used is descriptive and statistical analysis using the SmartPLS 3.0 test tool. This study shows that professional skepticism and task complexity have a positive effect on audit judgment and audit judgment has a positive effect on audit quality.


 

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Agoes, Sukrisno. 2012. Etika Bisnis dan Profesi: Tantangan membangun manusia seutuhnya, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

_____________. 2017. Auditing (Pemeriksaan Akuntan): Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik. Jilid 1, Edisi Kelima. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Albitar, Khaldon, Gerged Ali Meftah, Kikhia Hassan, Hussainey Khaled. 2020. Auditing in Times of Social Distancing: The Effect of COVID-19 on Auditing Quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.

Arens A.A., Beasley M.S, Elder R.J., 2017. Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Sixteenth Edition, Pearson.

Bowrin and King II. 2009. Time Pressure, Task Complexity and Audit Effectiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 25 No. 2, 2010 pp. 160-181

Chiang, Christina. 2016. Conceptualising the Linkage between Professional Skepticism and Auditor Independence. Pacific Accountant Review Vol. 28 No. 2.

Dang, Lil., Brown Kevin. F., McCullough, B.D, 2004, Apparent Audit Failures and Value Relevance of Earnings and Book Value. Review of Accounting and Finance Vol. 10 No. 2, 2011.

Ekawati. 2013. Pengaruh Profesionalisme, Pengalaman Kerja dan Tingkat Pendidikan Auditor terhadap Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika, Vol. 3 No.1, Desember 2013

Eutsler J, Norris Anne E, Trompeter M Gregory. 2018. A Live Simulation-Based Investigation: Interactions with Clients and Their Effect on Audit Judgement and Professional Skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory Vo. 37, No. 3.

Ghozali, Imam. 2014. Structural Equation Modeling, Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Edisi 4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Godfrey, J., et al. (2010). Accounting Theory (Seventh Edition). New York: McGraw Hill

Hery, 2017. Auditing dan Asurans: Integrated and Comprehensive Edition (Pemeriksaan Akuntansi Berbasis Standar Audit Internasional). Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia

Hurtt, R. K. 2010. Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (1): 149–71.

Husein Umar. 2014. Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Edisi Kedua. Cetakan ke-13. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hussin et al. 2017. Professional Skepticism and Auditor’s Assessment of Misstatement Risks: The Moderating Effect of Experience and Time Budget Pressure. Journal Economic and Sociology ISSN 2071-789X

I Made, Nyoman. 2014. Pengaruh Keahlian Audit, Konflik Peran, dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Kasus pada Inspektorat Pemerintah Kabupaten Gianyar dan Kabupaten Bangli) Bali.

Iffet, Kesimli. 2019. External Auditing and Quality. Series Edition. Springer. Turkey. ISBN 978-981-13-0526-9

Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia. 2013. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP). Salemba Emapat, Jakarta

Irwanti, 2011. “Pengaruh Gender dan Tekanan Ketaatan Terhadap Audit Judgment, Kompleksitas Tugas Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Jamilah, dkk. 2007. Pengaruh Gender, Tekanan Ketaatan, dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judgment. Proceeding SNA X Universitas Hasanudin Makasar. AUEP-06.

Kang, Yoon Ju, Trotman, Andrew, Trotman, Ken T. 2015. The Effect of An Audit Judgement Rule on Audit Committee Members’ Professional Skepticism: The Case of Accounting Estimates. Accounting, Organizations and Society 46 (2015) 59-76.

Kang, Yoon Ju dan Piercey, David. 2020. Would an Audit Judgement Rule Improve Audit Committee Oversight and Audit Quality? American Accounting Association. Current Issues in Auditing, Vol. 14, No.1 pp. P16-P25.

Kusuma dan Syamsudin. 2017. The effect of auditor quality to professional skepticsm and its relationship to audit quality. International Journal of Law and Management ISSN: 1754-243X

Maryani, Wiwien. 2017. Pengaruh Skeptisme, Pengalaman Auditor dan Self Efficiency terhadap Audit Judgement. Jurnal Akuntansi ISSN 2303-0356.

Nazir, Mohammad. 2011. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia Ladjamudin, Bin, Al-Bahra. 2005. Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta. Graha Ilmu

Nuarsih dan Merta, 2017. Pengaruh kompleksitas tugas, tekanan ketaatan dan senioritas auditor pada audit judgement. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana Vol.20.1. Juli (2017): 144-172. ISSN: 2302-8556

Peytcheva, Marietta. 2014. Professional Skepticism and Auditor Cognitive Performance in A Hypothesis-Testing Task. Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 29 No. 1.

Popova, Velina. 2013. Exploration of skepticism, client-specific experiences, and audit judgements. Managerial Audit Journal Vol. 28 No. 2

Putri dan Laksito. 2013. Pengaruh Lingkungan Etika, Pengalaman Auditor, dan tekanan Ketaatan terhadap Kualitas Audit Judgement. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013, Halaman 1-11. ISSN: 2337-3806

Quackdackers. 2012. Auditors’ Professional Skepticism: Neutrality versus Presumptive Doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 31 No. 3 (Fall 2014) pp. 639–657.

Ruiz, Barbadillo Emiliano, Nives Gomes Aguilar, Christina De Fuentes Barbera dan Maria Antonia Garcia Bernau. 2004. Audit Quality and The Going Concern Decision Making Process. European Accounting Review. Vol 13.

Simanjuntak, Piter. (2008). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure dan Resiko Kesalahan terhadap Penurunan Kualitas Audit. Tesis. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Suraida, Ida. 2005. Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman Audit dan Risiko Audit terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor dan Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Sosiohumaniora, vol. 7 No. 3, November 2005:186-202.

Tuanakotta, Theodorus. M. 2011. Berpikir Kritis dalam Auditing. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.

_______________________. 2014. Audit Berbasis ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Whittington, O. Ray dan Kurt Pann 2016. Principle of Auditing and Other Assurance Service, Twentieth Edition, Mc-Graw- Hill, New York, NY

Wolk, et al., 2013, Signaling, Agency Theory, Accounting Policy Choice. Accounting and Business Research. 18 (69): 47-56.

Yendrawati dan Mukti, 2015. Pengaruh Gender, Pengalaman Auditor, Kompleksitas Tugas, Tekanan Ketaatan, Kemampuan Kerja dan Pengetahuan Auditor terhadap Audit Judgement. Jurnal Inovasi dan Kewirausahaan UII.

Yuliyanti, Yeli Sita. 2018. Pengaruh Kompetensi Auditor, Tekanan Anggaran Waktu dan Kompleksitas Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Pemahaman Sistem Informasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Tirtayasa. Vol 03 No.02 Oktober.

Zuraidah dan Sanusi, 2007. Audit Judgement Performance: Assessing the Effect of Performance incentives, Effort and Tax Complexity. Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 22 No. 1