PENGARUH FRAUD TRIANGLE DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING DENGAN GCG SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 377
Download : 657
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fraudulent financial reporting is the deliberate neglect of amounts and disclosures with the intention of deceiving users of financial statements. This fraud usually occurs when a company reports higher than it actually (overstates) its assets or revenues, or when a company understates its liabilities and expenses. This research was conducted to determine the effect of pressure, opportunity, rationalization and rofitability on Fraudulent Financial Reporting with good corporate governance as a moderating variable. The method used in this research is quantitative research methods using panel data regression processing techniques with the help of the EVIEWS 9.0 program. The results showed that Pressure and opportunity had a positive and significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, GCG moderates the effect of pressure and opportunity on fraudulent financial reporting.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Albrecht, W. Steve. 2012. Fraud Examination. Mason: South-Western.
Andreas, 2018. uji statistik non parametik Kolmogrov-Smirnov. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Ansar, M. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan
Pada Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia, 1–25.
Baltagi, Badi H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
Beneish, M. (1997). Detecting GAAP violation: Implications for assessing earnings management
among firms with extreme financial performance. Journal of Accounting and Public
Policy, 16(3), 271–309.
Cressey, D.R (1953) Other people’s money, dalam: “Detecting and Predicting Financial Dwiyanti, R. (2010). A nalisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan
Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.
Universitas Diponegoro.
Gagola, Antonius S.C. (2011) “Analisis Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan
Kecurangan Pelaporan keuangan Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia”.Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan, Program Studi Magister Akuntansi program Pasca sarjana, Universitas Diponegoro
Hidayat, Muhammad dan Galib, Mukhtar. (2019). Analisis ROA Operasi dan ROA Keuangan Terhadap Earning Per Share (EPS) di Perusahaan Industri Pabrik Kertas yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology (JEMATech) Vol. 2, No. 1, Februari 2019
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2019) Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Cetakan pertama: Nopember 2014. Penerbit IAI: Jakarta
Indarti, Inova Fitri Siregar & Nurhayani Lubis, 2016. Fraud Detection Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Ndonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol. 13, No. 1, Maret 2016: 22-32
Iqbal, Muhammad, dan Murtanto. 2016. “Analisa Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Proferty Dan Real Estate Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.” Seminar Nasional Cendikiawan 2016.
Jensen, M. C., dan W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
Krishnan, J. and Ye, Z. (2005) “Why some companies seek shareholder ratification on auditor selection. Accounting Horizons. 19(4), 237–255
Laila Tiffani, Marfuah, 2015. Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 18 Medan.
Leo Handoko, Bambang. Dan Kinanti Ashari Ramadhani. 2017. Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit, Keahlian Keuangan Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kemungkinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. DeReMa Jurnal Manajemen Vol. 12 No. 1, Mei 2017
Lister, L.M. (2007) “A Practical Approach to Fraud Risk”: Internal Auditors.
Lou, Y. dan Wang, M-L. (2009). Fraud Risk Factor of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics
Research.
Martantya. 2013 “Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan melalui Faktor Risiko Tekanan dan Peluang”. Diponogoro Journal of Accounting Vol. 2 No. 2 Tahun 2013. ISSN: 2337-3806.
Sekaran, Uma dan Bougie, Roger, 2017) Metode penelitian untuk bisnis : pendekatan pengembangan Keahlian edisi 6 salemba 4 jakarta.
Sihombing, Kennedy Samuel dan Shiddiq Nur Rahardjo. 2014. Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud : Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012. Journal of Accounting, 3 (2), hal. 1-12.
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R. dan Wright, C. J. (2008). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statemenr Fraud: The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Triangle And SAS No 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13.
Skousen, C.J., Smith, K.R. dan Wright, C.J. (2009). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS no. 99. Journal of Corporate Governance and Firm Performances, 13, 53-81.
Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99”, Skousen et al. 2009. Journal of Corporate Governance and Firm Performance, 13: 53-81
Summers, S., & Sweeney, J. (1998) “Fraudulent misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis”. The Accounting Review, 73(January), 131-146.
Utama, 2016. Uji Statistik Deskriptif metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Grasindo