Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, berasal dari sebuah gagasan “filsafat pendidikan”, berbunyi “Non scholae sed vitae discimus” (kita belajar, bukan demi sertifikat/sekolah melainkan demi hidup, pro vitae).

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, adalah peer-reviewed journal, bertujuan untuk diseminasi atau menyebarluaskan temuan-temuan ilmiah di bidang Psikologi Pendidikan.

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, memuat artikel hasil penelitian yang terkait dengan bidang ilmu Psikologi Pendidikan. 

 

Section Policies

Front Page

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan menerapkan proses peer review. Semua artikel yang dikirimkan ke Provitae akan direview secara tertutup (blind review) oleh para mitra bebestari. Pada umumnya, setiap artikel akan direview oleh satu sampai dua orang reviewer. Tanggapan dari para reviewer ini akan dijadikan landasan bagi Editor untuk menentukan apakah suatu artikel dapat diterima (accepted), diterima dengan direvisi (accepted with major/minor revision), atau ditolak (rejected). Suatu artikel ditolak untuk dimuat disebabkan oleh berbagai pertimbangan, diantara artikel tidak sesuai dengan ruang lingkup ilmu Psikologi Pendidikan, sisi ilmiah tulisan tersebut kurang memadai untuk digolongkan dalam suatu tulisan ilmiah, kesalahan metodologi yang mendasar, atau dikarenakan penulis menolak untuk melakukan saran perbaikan yang diberikan oleh reviewer tanpa dasar yang logis. Semua artikel yang dikirim akan diperiksa unsur plagiasinya menggunakan perangkat lunak (software) anti plagiarisme (Turnitin).

 

Publication Frequency

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, terbit dua kali dalam setahun pada bulan April dan Oktober.

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, terbit perdana pada tahun 2004. ISSN print 0216-4485 dan ISSN online 2716-019X.

 

Open Access Policy

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke konten dengan memegang prinsip untuk membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum dalam rangka mendukung pertukaran global yang lebih besar dari ilmu pengetahuan.


Creative Commons License

Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, by UNTAR is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/provitae

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Universitas Tarumanagara, UNTAR). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed UNTAR Journals is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.


Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Tarumanagara (UNTAR) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the UNTAR and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.


Publication decisions

The editors of the Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


Confidentiality


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.


Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.


Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.


Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.




Duties of Authors


Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.


Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication


Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.


Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.


Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.


Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.


Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript


Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed




Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Plagiarism Check

Semua artikel yang dikirim akan diperiksa unsur plagiasinya menggunakan perangkat lunak (software) anti plagiarisme (Turnitin).

 

Article Processing Charge

Penyerahan artikel mulai dari awal sampai diterbitkan tidak dikenakan biaya, demi keterbukaan dan pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, khususnya dalam bidang Psikologi.

 

References Management

Jurnal ini menggunakan aplikasi MENDELEY dalam manajemen referensi dan style sitasi berdasarkan APA Style.