ANALISIS MODEL PENGARUH GOAL ORIENTATION, GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY DAN JENIS KELAMIN TERHADAP SELF-REGULATED LEARNING DALAM PEMBELAJARAN JARAK JAUH
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since COVID-19's entry into Indonesia in early March, 2020, the government has determined all educational institutions to carry out learning activities using the Distance Education method. The method changes are so fast that students as students who use this method do not have much time to adjust and meet various obstacles. This study aims to see how self-efficacy and goal orientation influences students self-regulated learning while carrying out distance education. This study also wants to look at differences in self-regulated learning between male and female students. This research uses quantitative methods. Respondents in this study were 319 students at a university in Jakarta who were carrying out learning activities with distance education methods. The instrument used is General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), 2x2 Achievement Goal Orientation Framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), and Metacognitive Self-Regulation dalam Motivated Strategies Learning Questionaire (MSLQ). The validity of the measuring instrument was carried out using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) method and hypothesis testing using path analysis processed through Mplus software version 7.11. The results of the path analysis test found that the model tested fit with the chi-square index = 2.39, df = 1, p-value = 0.25> 0.05), and RMSEA = 0.067. The final results of the study showed that self-efficacy, goal orientation, and gender had an effect of 19.7% on student self-regulated learning.
Sejak masuknya COVID-19 ke Indonesia awal Maret tahun 2020, pemerintah menetapkan seluruh institusi pendidikan untuk melaksanakan kegiatan belajar dengan metode Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (PJJ). Perubahan metode yang begitu cepat menyebabkan mahasiswa sebagai peserta didik yang menggunakan metode ini tidak memiliki banyak waktu untuk menyesuaikan diri dan menemui berbagai kendala. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana pengaruh keyakinan diri (self-efficacy) dan penetapan tujuan belajar (goal orientation) terhadap strategi regulasi dan pengelolaan aktivitas belajar (self-regulated learning) pada mahasiswa dengan metode PJJ. Penelitian ini juga ingin melihat self-regulated learning pada mahasiswa laki-laki dan perempuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Responden dalam penelitian ini adalah 319 mahasiswa disalah satu universitas di Jakarta yang sedang melaksanakan kegiatan belajar dengan metode PJJ. Alat ukur yang digunakan yaitu General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), 2x2 Achievement Goal Orientation Framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), dan Metacognitive Self-Regulation dalam Motivated Strategies Learning Questionaire (MSLQ). Validitas alat ukur dilakukan dengan metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) dan pengujian hipotesis menggunakan Path Analysis yang diolah melalui software Mplus versi 7.11. Hasil uji Path Analysis diketehui model yang diuji fit dengan indeks chi-square=2,39, df=1, p-value=0,25 >0,05), dan RMSEA=0,067. Hasil akhir penelitian menunjukkan self-efficacy, goal orientation, dan jenis kelamin memberikan pengaruh sebesar 19,7% terhadap self-regulated learning pada mahasiswa.
Article Details
References
Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214–222.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educutional Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice – Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Butler, D., & Winne, I. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura. A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
Gaskill, P. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning: the dynamic duo in school performance. Improving academic achievement, 9, 185-207.
Graham, S. & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83,187-194.
Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(2), 5–17.
Kuo, Y., Walker, A.E., Schroder, K.E.E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.
Locke, E. A. (1991). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 288-299.
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).
Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and student motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.) Advances In Motivation And Achievement. (Vol. 7, pp. 261-285) Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientation on males’ and females’ self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 11(2), 153-171.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, Nomor 109 Tahun 2013, tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Jarak Jauh pada Pendidikan Tinggi.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, Nomor 24 Tahun 2012, tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Jarak Jauh pada Pendidikan Tinggi
Pintrich, P. R., & E. V. De Groot. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82,334O.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). The University of Michigan.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2015). Self-efficacy: Education aspects. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (2nd) 21, 515-521.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-¬?efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, &M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal andcontrol beliefs (pp. 35-¬?37).
Schwarzer, R., Babler, J., Kwiatek, P., & Schroder, K. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the general self-efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69-88.
Surat Edaran Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, Nomor 04 Tahun 2020, tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease (Covid 19).
Surat Edaran Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, tentang Pedoman Masa Darurat Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease (Covid 19).
Winne, P. H. (2015). Self-regulated learning. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (2nd) 21, 535-540.
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and student’s motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2015). Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd) 21, 541-546.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, 13–39.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51.