Housing Behaviour of Urban Migrants Occupying Ngindung Lands in Yogyakarta

Wahyu Kusuma Astuti

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 209 times
PDF - 135 times

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the housing behavior of urban migrant and re-theorize Turner’s model on housing priority by linking it with the housing career of urban migrants in a particular locality and condition of land occupancy. The study is aimed at investigating housing priority and career of urban migrants occupying ngindung land in Yogyakarta through comprehensive quantitative analysis with crosstab technique. Five ngindung communities in Kelurahan Pringgokusuman were examined in this study. The research finding demonstrates that Turner’s model is irrelevant to explain the middle-income migrants’ behavior in choosing moderate standard housing but not maintaining proximity to jobs in the city as their income increases. This is argued to have several rationalities including their circular-mobility behavior and willingness to pay more transportation cost to workplace. Besides, homeownership is found to have no correlation with increase of income. It is therefore suggested that security for urban poor migrants is more about opportunity of livelihood rather than accumulation of assets. In conclusion, this research reflects on the limitation and uncertainty of housing options for urban poor migrants and suggests a radical shift from perceiving ‘housing as a product’ to ‘housing as a process’ –  of becoming along with the livelihood betterment of a community.

Keywords: Housing priority, housing behaviour, urban migrants, ngindung occupancy

Keywords

Housing priority, housing behaviour, urban migrants, ngindung occupancy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bell, M. & Ward, G. (2000). “Comparing Temporary Mobility with Permanent Migration”. Tourism Geographies, II(1), 97-107.

Bounds, M. (2004). Urban Social Theory: City Self, and Society. 1st ed. Victoria: Oxford University Press.

Clark, W. & Onaka, J. (1983). “Life Cycle and Housing Adjustment as Explanations of Residential Mobility”. Urban Studies, (20), 47-57.

Clark, W., Deurloo, M., & Dieleman, F. (1984). “Housing Consumption and Residential Mobility”. Annals of the Association of American Geograpers, 74(1), 29-43.

Clark, W., Dieleman. F. (1996). Household and Housing, Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market. New Brunswick: CUPR Press.

Clark, W., Deurloo, M., & Dieleman, F. (2003). “Housing Careers in the United States, 1968-93: Modelling the Sequencing of Housing States”. Urban Studies, 40(1), 143-160.

Curtis, C. & Montgomery, M. (2006). “Housing Mobility and Location Choice: A Review of the Literature. Working Paper”. Curtin: Urbanet Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin University.

De Smith, M. (2012). Statistical Analysis Handbook. [Online] tersedia di: http://www.statsref.com/HTML/index.html?statistical_data.html [Accessed on April 8, 2013, 15.05].

Garson, G.D. (2012). Sampling. North Carolina: Statistical Publishing Associates.

Huinink, J., Vidal, S. & Kley, S. (2011). “Effects of Residential Mobility On Job Mobility over the Life

Course”. Working Paper. New Haven, CT: Center for Research on Inequalities and the Life Course

Yale University.

Huang, Y. & Yi, C. (2011). “Second Home Ownership in Transitional Urban China”. Housing Studies,

(3), 1-31.

Li, B., Duda, M. & An, X. (2009). “Drivers of Housing Choice Among Rural-To-Urban Migrants:

Evidence from Taiyuan”. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2(2), 142-56.

Mahadevia, D. & Shah, P. (2009). Tenure Security and Urban Poverty. [Online] Social Protection Asia

tersedia di: http://www.socialprotectionasia.org/newsletter_4/tenure-security-and-urban-

poverty.html [Accessed on April, 8 2013, 19.01].

Morris, E., Crul, S. & Winter, M. (1976). “Housing Norms, Housing Satisfaction and the Prospensity to

Move”. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(2), 309-320.

Myers, D. (1982). “A Cohort-Based Indocators of Housing Progress”. Population Research and Policy

Review Vol. 1, No.2, 109-36.

Peisker, V. & Johnson, G. (2010). “Security and Anxiety of Homeownership: Perceptions of Midde-Class

Australians at Different Stages of Their Housing Careers”. Housing, Theory, and Society, 27(4),

-71.

Robinson, D., Reeve, K. & Casey, R. (2007). “The Housing Pathways of New Immigrants”. Research

Report. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation Sheffield Hallam University.

Setiawan, B. (2010). “Kampung Kota dan Kota Kampung; Tantangan Perencanaan Kota di Indonesia”.

Speech presented in Universitas Gadjah Mada as professorship speech in the field of urban

planning.

Teixera, C. (2010). Housing Immigrants and Newcomers in Central Okanagan, BC. Working Paper

Series. British Columbia: Metropolis British Columbia Metropolis British Columbia.

Turner, J. (1972). Freedom to Build: Dweller Control of the Housing Process. New York: The Macmillan

Company.

Turner, J. (1976). Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. London: Moris

Boyars Publisher Ltd.

Wu, W. (2004). “Sources of Migrant Housing Disadvantage in Urban China”. Environment and Planning,

, 1285-1304.

Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.