PERAN EFIKASI DIRI DAN DUKUNGAN SOSIAL TERHADAP REGULASI DIRI BELAJAR PADA WARGA BELAJAR KEJAR PAKET C

Main Article Content

Angelia Prasastha Widi Nugraheni
Sri Tiatri
Heni Mularsih

Abstract

Non-formal education is one of many complementary, substitutes, and enhancers of formal education to achieve equal education in Indonesia. One form of implementing non-formal high school equivalent education is called C Package. The implementation of the C package is centralized at  Community Learning Activity Center (PKBM), which is currently increasingly in demand by the community. Flexible lessons is one of many unique appeal to those interested in C package. Even though it is flexible in conducting lessons, the demand for mastery of the material and C package exam requirements is the same as formal education. This is a challenge for residents studying for C package, whom on average, are dropouts, are working and are married, or have limited study time. Therefore, it is necessary to possess the skill of self-regulation of studying for residents studying the C package. Self-regulation of studying is influenced by internal factors namely self-efficacy and external factors, namely social support. This study aims to determine and examine the role of self-efficacy and social support in self-regulation of studying. This research used correlational method with 83 participants participating in the C package program at X PKBM, aged 16 to 37 years. Participants were selected using purposive sampling technique. Instruments measuring the three research variables were adapted from Learning Strategies Scales, Self Efficacy Learning and Performance Scales and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Research data were analyzed using multiple regression. The results show that specifically, self-efficacy plays a role in self-regulation of studying (R2 = 0.245, p <0.05). Social support plays a role in self-regulation of studying (R2 = 0.210, p <0.05). Simultaneously, self-efficacy and social support contribute to self-regulation of studying (R2 = 0.359, p <0.05).

 

Pendidikan nonformal merupakan salah satu pelengkap, pengganti, dan penambah pendidikan formal untuk mencapai pemerataan pendidikan di Indonesia. Salah satu bentuk penyelenggaraan pendidikan nonformal setara MA/SMA disebut dengan paket C. Pelaksanaan paket C terpusat di Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKBM), yang saat ini semakin diminati oleh masyarakat. Pembelajaran yang fleksibel menjadi salah satu daya tarik tersendiri bagi peminat paket C. Meskipun fleksibel dalam pembelajaran, tuntutan penguasaan materi dan persyaratan ujian paket C sama dengan pendidikan formal. Hal ini menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi warga belajar paket C yang rata-rata merupakan warga putus sekolah, sudah bekerja dan berkeluarga, atau memiliki keterbatasan waktu belajar. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan kemampuan regulasi diri belajar pada warga belajar paket C. Regulasi diri belajar dipengaruhi oleh faktor internal yaitu efikasi diri dan faktor eksternal yaitu dukungan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menguji peran efikasi diri dan dukungan sosial terhadap regulasi diri belajar. Metode penelitian adalah korelasional dengan partisipan berjumlah 83 orang warga belajar program paket C di PKBM X, berusia 16 hingga 37 tahun. Pemilihan partisipan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen yang mengukur ketiga variabel penelitian diadaptasi dari Learning Strategies Scales, Self Efficacy Learning and Performance Scales dan Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Data penelitian dianalisis menggunakan regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara spesifik, efikasi diri berperan terhadap regulasi diri belajar (R2 = 0.245, p < 0.05). Dukungan sosial berperan terhadap regulasi diri belajar (R2 = 0.210, p < 0.05). Secara simultan, efikasi diri dan dukungan sosial berperan terhadap regulasi diri belajar (R2 = 0.359, p < 0.05).

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Asep., S.H., & Baharuddin, E. (2014) Metode penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2015). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. DOI:10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8.

Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Indrastiti., K.R. & Prihastuti (2017) Pengaruh dukungan sosial terhadap self-esteem pada remaja tunadaksa di Surabaya. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Perkembangan, 6. 72-82.

Irmawati (2017). Peran pusat kegiatan belajar masyarakat (PKBM) dalam mengurangi buta aksara di kabupaten karimun. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2(1), 286-294.

Joo, Y.-J., Bong, M., & Choi, H.-J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17. DOI:10.1007/bf02313398.

Murray, D. W., Rosanbalm, K., & Christopoulos, C. (2016). Self-regulation and toxic stress report 3: A comprehensive review of self-regulation interventions from birth through young adulthood (Report #2016-34). Washington DC: O?ce of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration of Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2002). Students’ self-efficacy in their self-regulated learning strategies: a developmental perspective. Psychologia-an international journal of psychology in the orient, 45(4), pp.211–221, DOI:10.2117/psysoc.2002.211.

Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83–98. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 (2008). Standar proses pendidikan kesetaraan program paket a, program paket b, dan program paket c.

Perry, J. C., Fisher, A. L., Caemmerer, J. M., Keith, T. Z., & Poklar, A. E. (2015). The role of social support and coping skills in promoting self-regulated learning among urban youth. Youth & Society, 50(4), 551–570. DOI:10.1177/0044118x15618313.

Pintrich (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. DOI:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.

Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2547.6968.

Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.

Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (63),pp. 3–12.DOI:10.1002/tl.37219956304

Price, J., Hertzog, C., & Dunlosky, J. (2010). Self-regulated learning in younger and older adults: does aging affect metacognitive control? Journal of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(3).329–359. DOI:10.1080/13825580903287941.

Purantiningrum, Liesna, Rukmana, Edi, Ekadharma, Arie, Hermana, Apip (2017) Model penyelenggaraan pendidikan kesetaraan program paket c dalam jaringan. PP-Paud dan Dikmas Jawa Barat, Lembang. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/7093.

Rahmah & Gazi (2017). The influence of self-efficacy and social support toward self-regulation traditional dancers. Jurnal Perempuan 31, 6(1).

Santoso, Singgih (2018) Panduan lengkap IBM SPSS versi 25. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Santoso, Agung (2010) Studi deskriptif effect size penelitian-penelitian di Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma. Jurnal Penelitian, 14 (1).1-17.

Santrock, J.W. (2007) Child development. 11th Edition, McGraw-Hill, Boston.

Schunk (2005) Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich, Educational Psychologist, 40:2, 85-94, DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3.

Sudjana (2000). Ilmu dan aplikasi pendidikan bagian II: Ilmu praktis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Suryabrata (2011), Metodologi penelitian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tamba, Alvin (2017). PKBM terkendala pendidik. harian nasional. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Oktober 2017 dari http://harnas.co/2017/10/15/pkbm-terkendala-pendidik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun (2003) Sistem pendidikan nasional.

United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2008). “Community learning centres: country reports from Asia,” Bangkok, pp. 84. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images /0016/001604/160492e.pdf.

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70. DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284–290. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284