GAMBARAN KOMUNIKASI SUPORTIF DARI TEMAN YANG MEMBANTU REGULASI EMOSI PADA MAHASISWA (STUDI PADA MAHASISWA YANG BARU MELEWATI TAHUN PERTAMA DI UNIVERSITAS X)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mahasiswa tahun pertama rentan terhadap stres yang disebabkan adanya masa transisi dan lingkungan baru. Pada saat yang bersamaan mereka dituntut untuk menampilkan performa akademik yang baik, membentuk relasi yang baru dengan teman, serta menjadi orang dewasa yang mandiri. Dukungan dari teman sebaya dalam bentuk komunikasi suportif dapat membantu mahasiswa tahun pertama dalam meregulasi emosinya agar mereka mampu menjalani perkuliahan dengan baik, sehingga pada akhirnya mampu berprestasi. Aspek dalam komunikasi suportif terdiri dari empati, menghormati, tulus, tidak menghakimi, motivasi, praktis atau dapat dipahami, dan menjaga rahasia. Dengan metode convenience sampling, sebanyak 15 mahasiswa tahun pertama dipilih sebagai responden penelitian. Gambaran komunikasi suportif yang membantu regulasi emosi dari teman sebaya diperoleh melalui wawancara kelompok terfokus dan wawancara mendalam. Hasil yang didapat menunjukkan bahwa empati, tulus, motivasi, dan saran praktis merupakan dasar komunikasi suportif dari teman yang membantu mahasiswa tahun pertama meregulasi emosinya.
Article Details
References
Beckett, C. D., & Kipnis, G. (2009). Collaborative communication: integrating SBAR to improve quality/patient safety outcomes. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 31(5), 19-28.
Bodie, G. D., Burleson, B. R., Holmstrom, A. J., McCullough, J. D., Rack, J. J., Hanasono, L. K., & Rosier, J. G. (2011). Effects of Cognitive Complexity and Emotional Upset on Processing Supportive Messages: Two Tests of a Dual?Process Theory of Supportive Communication Outcomes. Human Communication Research, 37(3), 350-376.
Buote, V. M., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., Adams, G., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J., & Wintre, M. G. (2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1st-year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 665-689.
Burleson, B. R. (1994). Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 135–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Burleson, B. R. (2008). What counts as effective emotional support? Explorations of individual and situational differences. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 207–227). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
David, L. T., & Nit?, G. L. (2014). Adjustment to first year of college–relations among self-perception, trust, mastery and alienation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 139-143.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(2), 348.
Jones, S. M., & Bodie, G. D. (2014). Supportive communication. In C. R. Berger (Ed.) Interpersonal communication. Vol. 6th. pp. 371–394. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Jones, S. M., & Wirtz, J. (2007). “Sad monkey see, monkey do”: Nonverbal matching in emotional support encounters. Communication Studies, 58, 71–86.
Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication. SAGE Publications.
Liu, J. E., Mok, E., & Wong, T. (2005). Perceptions of supportive communication in Chinese patients with cancer: experiences and expectations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(3), 262-270
MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Thompson, E. R. (2008). “Good” and “bad” advice: How to advise more effectively. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 145–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Macgeorge, E. L., Samter, W., & Gillihan, S. J. (2005). Academic Stress, Supportive Communication, and Health A version of this paper was presented at the 2005 International Communication Association convention in New York City. Communication Education, 54(4), 365-372.
Myers, D. G. (2004). Theories of Emotion. Psychology: Seventh Edition. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Singh, S., & Mishra, R. C. (2011). Emotion regulation strategies and their implications for well-being. Social Science International, 27(2), 179.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications
Poerwandari. (2007). Pendekatan kualitatif untuk penelitian perilaku manusia. Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi (LPSP3). Jakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia
Shanti, T. I. (2017). The influence of psychosocial factors on academic performance: A study carried out at Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Sl: sn).
Veale, D., Gilbert, P., Wheatley, J., & Naismith, I. (2015). A New Therapeutic Community: Development of a Compassion?Focussed and Contextual Behavioural Environment. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 22(4), 285-303.
Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 193-202.
Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie?Gauld, M. (2005). ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: the role of social support in the first?year experience of higher education. Studies in higher education, 30(6), 707-722.