DAMPAK PSIKOLOGIS MAHASISWA PADA IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOLABORATIF DAN PARTISIPATIF DI KABUPATEN BELITUNG

Main Article Content

Rita Markus Idulfilastri
Sri Tiatri
Keni Keni
Nafiah Solikhah
Fransisca I. R. Dewi
Jap Tji Beng

Abstract

Pembelajaran kolaboratif dan partisipatif merupakan salah satu indikator keberhasilan utama (IKU) yang dipersyaratkan untuk menilai ketercapaian pelaksanaan MBKM. Kegiatan penelitian ini berbasis projek (team-based project) yaitu kegiatan proyek lapangan yang dilakukan sesuai setting sebenarnya, bukan kegiatan di dalam kelas. Tujuan penelitian untuk melihat dampak psikologis pembelajaran kolaboratif dan partisipatif berpengaruh sebelum dan setelah melaksanakan proyek. Konsep teori yaitu kesiapan berubah (readiess to change) dan passion. Dimensi kesiapan berubah terdiri change of efficacy, ketepatan berubah, dukungan manajemen, manfaat pribadi dan dimensi passion terdiri dari harmony passion dan obsessive passion. Metode penelitian menggunakan kuasi eksperimen dengan jumlah sampel 6 mahasiswa UNTAR dan diambil data pre-test, post-test dan wawancara. Pengolahan data menggunakan korelasi dan compare mean t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terjadi hubungan kuat dan signifikan antara pre-test, post-test pada kesiapan berubah dan passion. khususnya pada dimensi-dimensi ketepatan melakukan perubahan, change of efficacy dan harmony passion. Namun hasil perbedaan rata-rata menunjukkan signifikan hanya pada change of efficacy. Kesimpulan penelitian memperlihatkan dampak psikologis change of efficacy terjadi pada mahasiswa yang melakukan implementasi pembelajaran kolaboratif dan partisipatif di kabupaten Belitung. Mahasiswa meyakini proyek yang dilakukannya memberikan dampak perubahan pada masyarakat. Keyakinan diri mahasiswa yang relatif kuat sebelum dilaksanakan proyek dan menjadi semakin bertambah kuat setelah selesai proyek dilaksanakan. Saran penelitian selanjutnya dilakukan beberapa kali proyek kegiatan untuk mempertahankan konsistensi data.

Collaborative and participatory learning is one of the main success indicators (IKU) required to assess the achievement of MBKM implementation. This research activity is project-based (team-based project), namely field project activities carried out according to the actual setting, not activities in the classroom. The aim of the research is to see the psychological impact of collaborative and participatory learning before and after implementing the project. The theoretical concepts used are readiness to change and passion. The changing dimension consists of changes in efficacy, changes in accuracy, management support, personal benefits and the passion dimension consists of harmony passion and obsessive passion. The research method used a quasi-experimental with a sample of 6 UNTAR students and pre-test, post-test and interview data were taken. Processing of data using correlation and comparing the mean t-test. The results showed that there was a strong and significant relationship between pre-test, post-test on readiness to change and passion. especially on the dimensions of accuracy in making changes, changes in efficacy and passion for harmony. However, the results of the mean difference showed significant only in the change in success. The conclusion of this research is the impact of psychological impact on efficacy changes that occur in students who implement collaborative and participatory learning in Belitung district. Students believe in projects that have a changing impact on society. Students' self-confidence is relatively strong before the project is implemented and becomes stronger after the project is completed. Subsequent research suggests several project activities to maintain data.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Keni Keni, Universitas Tarumanagara

Fakultas Ekonomi

 

 

SINTA ID : 5987760


References

Agostini, A., Di Biase, E., & DISCo, M. L. (2010). Stimulating cooperative and participative learning to match digital natives’ needs (pp. 274–279). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/percomw.2010.5470657

Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Mind of Fire. University pf Southern California (USC). Retrieved from http://www.johnseelybrown.com

Dirjen Dikti. (2021). Buku Panduan Indikator Kinerja Utama Perguruan Tinggi Negeri.

Haqq, Z. N., & Natsir, M. (2019). Three Components of Readiness to Change: Communication of Change and Change-Efficacy as Antecendents. Perisai : Islamic Banking and Finance Journal, 3(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.21070/perisai.v3i1.2011

Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295

Kunat, B. (2018). Passion and Creativity - Together or separately? Creativity, 5(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0004

Laal, M., & Ghodisi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of Collaborative Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490.

Mandusic, D., & Blaskovic, L. (2015). The Impact of Collaborative Learning to Critically Thinking. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 13(Supp1.1.), 426–428.

Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 645–656. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8

Saragih, E. H. (2015). Individual Attributes of Change Readiness: A Case Study at Indonesia State-owned Railway Company. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 34–41.

Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315

Undang-undang RI, U. Undang-undang Sistem Pendidikan RI (2003). Indonesia.

Vakola, M. (2014). What’s in there for me? Individual readiness to change and the perceived impact of organizational change. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2012-0064

Vallerand, R. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.1