DUALISME PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DI SEKTOR JASA KEUANGAN

Article Sidebar

Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni
PDF
Published: Feb 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i2.1469
Keywords:
Keywords consumer dispute financial service sector.

Main Article Content

Andryawan Andryawan

Abstract

The estabilishment of alternative dispute settlement institutions in the financial service sector by financial services authorithy as if it wants to compete with the existence of consumer dispute settlement agency. The estabilishment institutions of alternative dispute settlement in the financial service sector on the basic of financial service authority regulatory law number 1 year 2014 on the financial service authority, while consumer dispute settlement agency formed by the law number 8 year 1999. Verdict generated by these two institutions are final and binding, however against the verdict institutions of alternative dispute settlement in the financial service sector cannot be impelemnted if the consumer does not accept the verdict, giving rise to the possibility for financial service businesses to submit district court (of justice). Another case with verdict of the consumer dispute settlement agency it can be objected in district court (of justice) by one of the parties does not accept the verdict. The prosecuting authority (competence) of the institutions of alternative dispute resolution financial service sector and consumer dispute resolution has not been regulation, so that dualism in handling consumer disputes settlement agency. This is evidenced by the many disputes between the consumer banking or non-banking and non-financial services businesses were marked by consumer dispute settlement agency. Therefore need for strict regulation regarding the authority or competence of an absolute judge of these two institutions and needs for improvement of the legislation to get around this legal weaknes shortcomings.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Black, Henry Campbell. (1990). Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing Co., St. Paul-

Minnessota.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian (Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak

Komersial). Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.

________. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

________. Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor

Tahun 2001 tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang Badan Penyelesaian

Sengketa Konsumen.

________. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Lembaga

Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan.

ND, Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualisme Metode Penelitian Hukum

Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.

Nugroho, Susanti Adi. (2011). Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Ditinjau dari

Hukum Acara Serta Kendala Implementasinya. Kencana Prenada Media Group,

Jakarta.

Shidarta. (2006). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Grasindo, Jakarta.

Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning. (2011). Penyelesaian Masalah Diskriminasi Terhadap Etnis

Cina (Studi Tentang Perkembangan Politik Hukum di Bidang Kewarganegaraan

Republik Indonesia). UNDIP, Semarang.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. (2012). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang

Pasti dan Berkeadilan). UII Press, Yogyakarta.