GAMBARAN WORK CENTRALITY (STUDI PADA KARYAWAN SWASTA DI JAKARTA)

Main Article Content

Rizki Dwi Prasetya
Yenike Margaret Isak
P. Tommy Y. S Suyasa

Abstract

Work centrality is defined as the extent to which individuals believe that their work plays an important role in their life. This study aims to describe the work centrality of the private employment in Jakarta. Descriptive quantitative was used in this study. The data collection techniques in this study were using snowball sampling and convenience sampling. The participants were 107 private employees in Jakarta. Work centrality was measured using Work Involvement Questionnaire. The results showed that work centrality of the private employees in Jakarta were low. Based on demographic factors, it also shows that the mean value of male gender is lower, but based on other factors, there is a significant relationship to work centrality and the level of education.

 

Work centrality diartikan sebagai sejauh mana individu percaya bahwa pekerjaan mereka memainkan peran penting dalam kehidupan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran work centrality pada karyawan swasta di Jakarta. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Teknik pengambilan data dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan snowball sampling dan convenience sampling. Subjek pada penelitian ini melibatkan 107 karyawan swasta di Jakarta. Alat ukur yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner work centrality yang telah diadaptasi dari Work Involvement Questionnaire. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa gambaran work centrality secara umum pada karyawan swasta di Jakarta cenderung rendah. Berdasarkan faktor demografis juga menunjukkan bahwa nilai rerata pada jenis kelamin laki-laki lebih rendah, namun berdasarkan faktor lainnya terdapat hubungan yang signifikan terhadap work centrality dengan tingkat pendidikan.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rizki Dwi Prasetya, Universitas Tarumanagara

Department Psychology

Yenike Margaret Isak, Universitas Tarumanagara

Department Psychology

P. Tommy Y. S Suyasa, Universitas Tarumanagara

Department Psychology

References

Abadini, D., & Wuryaningsih, C. E. (2019). Determinan aktivitas fisik orang dewasa pekerja kantoran di Jakarta tahun 2018. Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, 14(1), 15-28.

Arvey, R. D., Harpaz, I., & Liao, H. (2004). Work centrality and post-award work behavior of lottery winners. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP. 138.5.404-420.

Bal, P. M., & Kooij, D. (2011). The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: The influence of age. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(4), 497-523.

Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 93 – 108.

Hu, S., Jiang, L., Probst, T. M., & Liu, M. (2018). The relationship between qualitative job insecurity and subjective well-being in Chinese employees: The role of work–family conflict and work centrality. Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://journals. sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0143831X18759793

Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341

Kostek, J. A. (2012). Work centrality: A meta-analysis of the nomological network (Master’s thesis). Bowling Green State University, OH.

Kumparan. (2018, 10 April). Alasan mengapa anda harus bekerja keras. https://kumparan.com/tog-indonesia/mengapa-anda-harus-bekerja-keras

Morelli, N. A., & Cunningham, C. J. (2012). Not all resources are created equal: COR theory, values, and stress. The Journal of Psychology, 146(4), 393-415.

Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 224

Schmidt, J. A., & Lee, K. (2008). Voluntary retirement and organizational turnover intentions: The differential associations with work and non-work commitment constructs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(4), 297-309.

Snir, R., & Harpaz, I. (2002). Work-leisure relations: Leisure orientation and the meaning of work. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 178-203.

Ugwu, F. O., & Igbende, D. A. (2017). Going beyond borders: Work centrality, emotional intelligence and employee optimism as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Cogent Psychology, 4(1). https://www.cogentoa.com/article/10.1080/23311908. 2017.1362805

Ulty. (2020, Maret 25). Lancang kuning.com media masa kini: Macam-macam personil administrasi. Diakses pada 4 Januari 2021, https://lancangkuning.com/post/17343/macam-macam-personil-administrasi